How to calculate the right interval for a timelapse on a boatWhat flash unit should I choose for taking photos on a night boat cruise?What lenses should I choose for a night boat cruise?How to figure out the optimal interval for a time lapse movie?How to setup a long running timelapse?Timelapse for sticky notesHow can I keep my camera warm while photographing time lapses over a few hours of 25F / - 4C temperatures?How to do 1 or more photos per second without jitter using a Canon 7D?Indoor timelapse photoWhy is Nikon D7000 unable to do two RAW shoots per second for a long time?How do I stabilize a shaky timelapse?
Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?
Why do I get "Binary file matches" with grep -I?
Do parry bonuses stack?
Why can't we say "I have been having a dog"?
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?
What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?
Spam email "via" my domain, but SPF record exists
How to aggregate categorical data in R?
Error when overriding validators pipeline to create custom error text
Connect points with lines QGIS
Different meanings of こわい
In Bayesian inference, why are some terms dropped from the posterior predictive?
How obscure is the use of 令 in 令和?
Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?
Do creatures with a speed 0ft., fly 30ft. (hover) ever touch the ground?
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
How dangerous is XSS
Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
How to delete logs automatically after a certain time and restart the process that fills up the log file?
Notepad++ delete until colon for every line with replace all
Any reason why UK visa biometrics suspended at USCIS ASC?
Concerning the definitions of the enthalpy, the Helmholtz free energy and the Gibbs free energy of a system
How to calculate the right interval for a timelapse on a boat
What flash unit should I choose for taking photos on a night boat cruise?What lenses should I choose for a night boat cruise?How to figure out the optimal interval for a time lapse movie?How to setup a long running timelapse?Timelapse for sticky notesHow can I keep my camera warm while photographing time lapses over a few hours of 25F / - 4C temperatures?How to do 1 or more photos per second without jitter using a Canon 7D?Indoor timelapse photoWhy is Nikon D7000 unable to do two RAW shoots per second for a long time?How do I stabilize a shaky timelapse?
I'm soon going on a canal boat trip and I wanted to create a timelapse of the boats travel.
I've obviously only got one shot at this, so I wanted to know what is the best method for calculating the right interval to take each frame at. I know the speed limit of the canal and want to create a video that is comfortable to watch (I've seen examples on youtube that are either too fast or too slow).
timelapse framerate boat-cruise
add a comment |
I'm soon going on a canal boat trip and I wanted to create a timelapse of the boats travel.
I've obviously only got one shot at this, so I wanted to know what is the best method for calculating the right interval to take each frame at. I know the speed limit of the canal and want to create a video that is comfortable to watch (I've seen examples on youtube that are either too fast or too slow).
timelapse framerate boat-cruise
For my own future reference, this guy seems to have it figured out - natureinfocus.co.uk/how-i-shoot-my-time-lapse-movies
– Neil P
7 hours ago
Right for what? How do do you determine "too fast" or "too slow"?
– mattdm
3 hours ago
@mattdm I suppose that is subjective, like a lot of photography, although it would be fair to say that some time lapses move at an uncomfortably quick rate (like trying to watch a video being fast forwarded at x64). Too slow and you end up with a real time video, which is also not the desired effect.
– Neil P
3 hours ago
1
Sooooo, I think in order to figure out your answer, you need to have clear in your mind what the desired effect is.
– mattdm
2 hours ago
Are you taking a series of stills at intervals, or are you using a built-in timelapse feature of your camera? I ask because it may impact answers -- for example, taking stills gives you the option of stitching them together differently (or at different rates) afterward, whereas the built-in timelapse mode is more of a one shot deal.
– A C
7 mins ago
add a comment |
I'm soon going on a canal boat trip and I wanted to create a timelapse of the boats travel.
I've obviously only got one shot at this, so I wanted to know what is the best method for calculating the right interval to take each frame at. I know the speed limit of the canal and want to create a video that is comfortable to watch (I've seen examples on youtube that are either too fast or too slow).
timelapse framerate boat-cruise
I'm soon going on a canal boat trip and I wanted to create a timelapse of the boats travel.
I've obviously only got one shot at this, so I wanted to know what is the best method for calculating the right interval to take each frame at. I know the speed limit of the canal and want to create a video that is comfortable to watch (I've seen examples on youtube that are either too fast or too slow).
timelapse framerate boat-cruise
timelapse framerate boat-cruise
asked 7 hours ago
Neil PNeil P
1414
1414
For my own future reference, this guy seems to have it figured out - natureinfocus.co.uk/how-i-shoot-my-time-lapse-movies
– Neil P
7 hours ago
Right for what? How do do you determine "too fast" or "too slow"?
– mattdm
3 hours ago
@mattdm I suppose that is subjective, like a lot of photography, although it would be fair to say that some time lapses move at an uncomfortably quick rate (like trying to watch a video being fast forwarded at x64). Too slow and you end up with a real time video, which is also not the desired effect.
– Neil P
3 hours ago
1
Sooooo, I think in order to figure out your answer, you need to have clear in your mind what the desired effect is.
– mattdm
2 hours ago
Are you taking a series of stills at intervals, or are you using a built-in timelapse feature of your camera? I ask because it may impact answers -- for example, taking stills gives you the option of stitching them together differently (or at different rates) afterward, whereas the built-in timelapse mode is more of a one shot deal.
– A C
7 mins ago
add a comment |
For my own future reference, this guy seems to have it figured out - natureinfocus.co.uk/how-i-shoot-my-time-lapse-movies
– Neil P
7 hours ago
Right for what? How do do you determine "too fast" or "too slow"?
– mattdm
3 hours ago
@mattdm I suppose that is subjective, like a lot of photography, although it would be fair to say that some time lapses move at an uncomfortably quick rate (like trying to watch a video being fast forwarded at x64). Too slow and you end up with a real time video, which is also not the desired effect.
– Neil P
3 hours ago
1
Sooooo, I think in order to figure out your answer, you need to have clear in your mind what the desired effect is.
– mattdm
2 hours ago
Are you taking a series of stills at intervals, or are you using a built-in timelapse feature of your camera? I ask because it may impact answers -- for example, taking stills gives you the option of stitching them together differently (or at different rates) afterward, whereas the built-in timelapse mode is more of a one shot deal.
– A C
7 mins ago
For my own future reference, this guy seems to have it figured out - natureinfocus.co.uk/how-i-shoot-my-time-lapse-movies
– Neil P
7 hours ago
For my own future reference, this guy seems to have it figured out - natureinfocus.co.uk/how-i-shoot-my-time-lapse-movies
– Neil P
7 hours ago
Right for what? How do do you determine "too fast" or "too slow"?
– mattdm
3 hours ago
Right for what? How do do you determine "too fast" or "too slow"?
– mattdm
3 hours ago
@mattdm I suppose that is subjective, like a lot of photography, although it would be fair to say that some time lapses move at an uncomfortably quick rate (like trying to watch a video being fast forwarded at x64). Too slow and you end up with a real time video, which is also not the desired effect.
– Neil P
3 hours ago
@mattdm I suppose that is subjective, like a lot of photography, although it would be fair to say that some time lapses move at an uncomfortably quick rate (like trying to watch a video being fast forwarded at x64). Too slow and you end up with a real time video, which is also not the desired effect.
– Neil P
3 hours ago
1
1
Sooooo, I think in order to figure out your answer, you need to have clear in your mind what the desired effect is.
– mattdm
2 hours ago
Sooooo, I think in order to figure out your answer, you need to have clear in your mind what the desired effect is.
– mattdm
2 hours ago
Are you taking a series of stills at intervals, or are you using a built-in timelapse feature of your camera? I ask because it may impact answers -- for example, taking stills gives you the option of stitching them together differently (or at different rates) afterward, whereas the built-in timelapse mode is more of a one shot deal.
– A C
7 mins ago
Are you taking a series of stills at intervals, or are you using a built-in timelapse feature of your camera? I ask because it may impact answers -- for example, taking stills gives you the option of stitching them together differently (or at different rates) afterward, whereas the built-in timelapse mode is more of a one shot deal.
– A C
7 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If you play the video at 30 frames/s, taking one picture/second is a 30x speedup. If your boat sails at 3mph, the time lapse at one picture/second will be a simulated 90mph. How much of a road can you see driving a car at that speed?
Taking the problem by the other end, figure out your "cruise" speed when in a car, divide by the boat speed. This is your "acceptable speedup". This speedup is your timelapse image interval multiplied by the framerate of the playback (20-30fps).
Of course if you want to shoot the whole cruise (say 3 hours=10000s) and make that a 10mn video (600 seconds) then you have to take 12000 pictures, roughly one picture/second but it can be a bit fast.
Keep in mind that the fjord cruise is taken from high above water in a wide fjord, so the feel of the speed is much less and you can use greater speedup factors. This would also be true if you drive your car in a desert (vs. in a forest or downtown). But picturesque waterways are seldom in a very open landscape.
Last, shooting too fast may induce more wear in the camera, and require more storage(*) and/or battery capacity but you can drop frames to slow down the final video. If you are too slow when taking the pictures, you can't fix it later.
(*) Of course for a time lapse, you may set your camera to a lower resolution or lesser JPEG quality.
Often the bigger downsides of going too fast are battery life and storage capacity. Not knowing the hardware we don't know whether it will charge on the go at all, or whether the OP has the means to do so.
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Of course... if these were not a problem, we would shoot at 30fps and cull the frames in post-production.
– xenoid
2 hours ago
30fps would be video mode on any hardware I've got, but 1fps is often unsustainable
– Chris H
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106336%2fhow-to-calculate-the-right-interval-for-a-timelapse-on-a-boat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you play the video at 30 frames/s, taking one picture/second is a 30x speedup. If your boat sails at 3mph, the time lapse at one picture/second will be a simulated 90mph. How much of a road can you see driving a car at that speed?
Taking the problem by the other end, figure out your "cruise" speed when in a car, divide by the boat speed. This is your "acceptable speedup". This speedup is your timelapse image interval multiplied by the framerate of the playback (20-30fps).
Of course if you want to shoot the whole cruise (say 3 hours=10000s) and make that a 10mn video (600 seconds) then you have to take 12000 pictures, roughly one picture/second but it can be a bit fast.
Keep in mind that the fjord cruise is taken from high above water in a wide fjord, so the feel of the speed is much less and you can use greater speedup factors. This would also be true if you drive your car in a desert (vs. in a forest or downtown). But picturesque waterways are seldom in a very open landscape.
Last, shooting too fast may induce more wear in the camera, and require more storage(*) and/or battery capacity but you can drop frames to slow down the final video. If you are too slow when taking the pictures, you can't fix it later.
(*) Of course for a time lapse, you may set your camera to a lower resolution or lesser JPEG quality.
Often the bigger downsides of going too fast are battery life and storage capacity. Not knowing the hardware we don't know whether it will charge on the go at all, or whether the OP has the means to do so.
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Of course... if these were not a problem, we would shoot at 30fps and cull the frames in post-production.
– xenoid
2 hours ago
30fps would be video mode on any hardware I've got, but 1fps is often unsustainable
– Chris H
2 hours ago
add a comment |
If you play the video at 30 frames/s, taking one picture/second is a 30x speedup. If your boat sails at 3mph, the time lapse at one picture/second will be a simulated 90mph. How much of a road can you see driving a car at that speed?
Taking the problem by the other end, figure out your "cruise" speed when in a car, divide by the boat speed. This is your "acceptable speedup". This speedup is your timelapse image interval multiplied by the framerate of the playback (20-30fps).
Of course if you want to shoot the whole cruise (say 3 hours=10000s) and make that a 10mn video (600 seconds) then you have to take 12000 pictures, roughly one picture/second but it can be a bit fast.
Keep in mind that the fjord cruise is taken from high above water in a wide fjord, so the feel of the speed is much less and you can use greater speedup factors. This would also be true if you drive your car in a desert (vs. in a forest or downtown). But picturesque waterways are seldom in a very open landscape.
Last, shooting too fast may induce more wear in the camera, and require more storage(*) and/or battery capacity but you can drop frames to slow down the final video. If you are too slow when taking the pictures, you can't fix it later.
(*) Of course for a time lapse, you may set your camera to a lower resolution or lesser JPEG quality.
Often the bigger downsides of going too fast are battery life and storage capacity. Not knowing the hardware we don't know whether it will charge on the go at all, or whether the OP has the means to do so.
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Of course... if these were not a problem, we would shoot at 30fps and cull the frames in post-production.
– xenoid
2 hours ago
30fps would be video mode on any hardware I've got, but 1fps is often unsustainable
– Chris H
2 hours ago
add a comment |
If you play the video at 30 frames/s, taking one picture/second is a 30x speedup. If your boat sails at 3mph, the time lapse at one picture/second will be a simulated 90mph. How much of a road can you see driving a car at that speed?
Taking the problem by the other end, figure out your "cruise" speed when in a car, divide by the boat speed. This is your "acceptable speedup". This speedup is your timelapse image interval multiplied by the framerate of the playback (20-30fps).
Of course if you want to shoot the whole cruise (say 3 hours=10000s) and make that a 10mn video (600 seconds) then you have to take 12000 pictures, roughly one picture/second but it can be a bit fast.
Keep in mind that the fjord cruise is taken from high above water in a wide fjord, so the feel of the speed is much less and you can use greater speedup factors. This would also be true if you drive your car in a desert (vs. in a forest or downtown). But picturesque waterways are seldom in a very open landscape.
Last, shooting too fast may induce more wear in the camera, and require more storage(*) and/or battery capacity but you can drop frames to slow down the final video. If you are too slow when taking the pictures, you can't fix it later.
(*) Of course for a time lapse, you may set your camera to a lower resolution or lesser JPEG quality.
If you play the video at 30 frames/s, taking one picture/second is a 30x speedup. If your boat sails at 3mph, the time lapse at one picture/second will be a simulated 90mph. How much of a road can you see driving a car at that speed?
Taking the problem by the other end, figure out your "cruise" speed when in a car, divide by the boat speed. This is your "acceptable speedup". This speedup is your timelapse image interval multiplied by the framerate of the playback (20-30fps).
Of course if you want to shoot the whole cruise (say 3 hours=10000s) and make that a 10mn video (600 seconds) then you have to take 12000 pictures, roughly one picture/second but it can be a bit fast.
Keep in mind that the fjord cruise is taken from high above water in a wide fjord, so the feel of the speed is much less and you can use greater speedup factors. This would also be true if you drive your car in a desert (vs. in a forest or downtown). But picturesque waterways are seldom in a very open landscape.
Last, shooting too fast may induce more wear in the camera, and require more storage(*) and/or battery capacity but you can drop frames to slow down the final video. If you are too slow when taking the pictures, you can't fix it later.
(*) Of course for a time lapse, you may set your camera to a lower resolution or lesser JPEG quality.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 5 hours ago
xenoidxenoid
4,3341520
4,3341520
Often the bigger downsides of going too fast are battery life and storage capacity. Not knowing the hardware we don't know whether it will charge on the go at all, or whether the OP has the means to do so.
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Of course... if these were not a problem, we would shoot at 30fps and cull the frames in post-production.
– xenoid
2 hours ago
30fps would be video mode on any hardware I've got, but 1fps is often unsustainable
– Chris H
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Often the bigger downsides of going too fast are battery life and storage capacity. Not knowing the hardware we don't know whether it will charge on the go at all, or whether the OP has the means to do so.
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Of course... if these were not a problem, we would shoot at 30fps and cull the frames in post-production.
– xenoid
2 hours ago
30fps would be video mode on any hardware I've got, but 1fps is often unsustainable
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Often the bigger downsides of going too fast are battery life and storage capacity. Not knowing the hardware we don't know whether it will charge on the go at all, or whether the OP has the means to do so.
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Often the bigger downsides of going too fast are battery life and storage capacity. Not knowing the hardware we don't know whether it will charge on the go at all, or whether the OP has the means to do so.
– Chris H
2 hours ago
Of course... if these were not a problem, we would shoot at 30fps and cull the frames in post-production.
– xenoid
2 hours ago
Of course... if these were not a problem, we would shoot at 30fps and cull the frames in post-production.
– xenoid
2 hours ago
30fps would be video mode on any hardware I've got, but 1fps is often unsustainable
– Chris H
2 hours ago
30fps would be video mode on any hardware I've got, but 1fps is often unsustainable
– Chris H
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106336%2fhow-to-calculate-the-right-interval-for-a-timelapse-on-a-boat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
For my own future reference, this guy seems to have it figured out - natureinfocus.co.uk/how-i-shoot-my-time-lapse-movies
– Neil P
7 hours ago
Right for what? How do do you determine "too fast" or "too slow"?
– mattdm
3 hours ago
@mattdm I suppose that is subjective, like a lot of photography, although it would be fair to say that some time lapses move at an uncomfortably quick rate (like trying to watch a video being fast forwarded at x64). Too slow and you end up with a real time video, which is also not the desired effect.
– Neil P
3 hours ago
1
Sooooo, I think in order to figure out your answer, you need to have clear in your mind what the desired effect is.
– mattdm
2 hours ago
Are you taking a series of stills at intervals, or are you using a built-in timelapse feature of your camera? I ask because it may impact answers -- for example, taking stills gives you the option of stitching them together differently (or at different rates) afterward, whereas the built-in timelapse mode is more of a one shot deal.
– A C
7 mins ago