Salesman text me from his personal phoneAm I obliged to obtain quotes for my builder's insurance company?Can Amazon ask for my credit card statement?Do I require a UK casino operating licence to run a promotional tournament on my website?Does vehicle information count as personal data?Do aggregated personal data fall under GDPR personal data rules?Can background screening companies be forced to remove stored personal data under GDPR?Are Phone Number lists with no other personal data allowed under GDPR?Hypothetical code leak frame up - how to defend?How does GDPR apply for normal email communication?GDPR Requirements for restricted use corporate webapp
Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd
What does the same-ish mean?
Is it possible to map the firing of neurons in the human brain so as to stimulate artificial memories in someone else?
Is it possible to create a QR code using text?
How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?
How obscure is the use of 令 in 令和?
When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?
What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?
Why were 5.25" floppy drives cheaper than 8"?
Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?
How to keep a dark protagonist who wants to keep his humanity dark?
What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?
Obtaining database information and values in extended properties
Knowledge-based authentication using Domain-driven Design in C#
How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?
Why do I get negative height?
My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?
In Bayesian inference, why are some terms dropped from the posterior predictive?
Why do I get "Binary file matches" with grep -I?
In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?
Why can't we say "I have been having a dog"?
How to show a landlord what we have in savings?
How does a dynamic QR code work?
Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?
Salesman text me from his personal phone
Am I obliged to obtain quotes for my builder's insurance company?Can Amazon ask for my credit card statement?Do I require a UK casino operating licence to run a promotional tournament on my website?Does vehicle information count as personal data?Do aggregated personal data fall under GDPR personal data rules?Can background screening companies be forced to remove stored personal data under GDPR?Are Phone Number lists with no other personal data allowed under GDPR?Hypothetical code leak frame up - how to defend?How does GDPR apply for normal email communication?GDPR Requirements for restricted use corporate webapp
I recently went to a garage to ask about different cars and offers, the salesman took some details; phone and email, when leaving I said to him I would be in touch if I wanted to proceed. He called me off the garage's phone and emailed me off their work email but I have been busy with work so missed the call and forgot to email back. I received a text from an unknown number asking if I still wanted the car, I replied asking who it was to which he replied: "it's X from Windsor's lol".
To say I'm furious he got my personal details from their system to text me off his personal phone is an understatement, I just want to know if this is a breach in GDPR or anything like that. Receiving calls and emails from the garage are fine because that is their work environment but when someone goes onto that system to get my information and use it this way is unacceptable to me.
I am looking to take this further and would just like to know my options here because who knows how many other people he has done this to, I have been in touch with his manager but got the feeling he thought X was doing an outstanding job by hounding me in his personal time.
united-kingdom gdpr european-union
New contributor
add a comment |
I recently went to a garage to ask about different cars and offers, the salesman took some details; phone and email, when leaving I said to him I would be in touch if I wanted to proceed. He called me off the garage's phone and emailed me off their work email but I have been busy with work so missed the call and forgot to email back. I received a text from an unknown number asking if I still wanted the car, I replied asking who it was to which he replied: "it's X from Windsor's lol".
To say I'm furious he got my personal details from their system to text me off his personal phone is an understatement, I just want to know if this is a breach in GDPR or anything like that. Receiving calls and emails from the garage are fine because that is their work environment but when someone goes onto that system to get my information and use it this way is unacceptable to me.
I am looking to take this further and would just like to know my options here because who knows how many other people he has done this to, I have been in touch with his manager but got the feeling he thought X was doing an outstanding job by hounding me in his personal time.
united-kingdom gdpr european-union
New contributor
4
This must be the most modern-day-British thing I've read today.
– Tobias Weiß
4 hours ago
2
So you are 100% certain that this salesman's cell phone is not provided to them and paid for by the dealership?
– MonkeyZeus
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I recently went to a garage to ask about different cars and offers, the salesman took some details; phone and email, when leaving I said to him I would be in touch if I wanted to proceed. He called me off the garage's phone and emailed me off their work email but I have been busy with work so missed the call and forgot to email back. I received a text from an unknown number asking if I still wanted the car, I replied asking who it was to which he replied: "it's X from Windsor's lol".
To say I'm furious he got my personal details from their system to text me off his personal phone is an understatement, I just want to know if this is a breach in GDPR or anything like that. Receiving calls and emails from the garage are fine because that is their work environment but when someone goes onto that system to get my information and use it this way is unacceptable to me.
I am looking to take this further and would just like to know my options here because who knows how many other people he has done this to, I have been in touch with his manager but got the feeling he thought X was doing an outstanding job by hounding me in his personal time.
united-kingdom gdpr european-union
New contributor
I recently went to a garage to ask about different cars and offers, the salesman took some details; phone and email, when leaving I said to him I would be in touch if I wanted to proceed. He called me off the garage's phone and emailed me off their work email but I have been busy with work so missed the call and forgot to email back. I received a text from an unknown number asking if I still wanted the car, I replied asking who it was to which he replied: "it's X from Windsor's lol".
To say I'm furious he got my personal details from their system to text me off his personal phone is an understatement, I just want to know if this is a breach in GDPR or anything like that. Receiving calls and emails from the garage are fine because that is their work environment but when someone goes onto that system to get my information and use it this way is unacceptable to me.
I am looking to take this further and would just like to know my options here because who knows how many other people he has done this to, I have been in touch with his manager but got the feeling he thought X was doing an outstanding job by hounding me in his personal time.
united-kingdom gdpr european-union
united-kingdom gdpr european-union
New contributor
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
StephanS
42320
42320
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
RyanKRyanK
284
284
New contributor
New contributor
4
This must be the most modern-day-British thing I've read today.
– Tobias Weiß
4 hours ago
2
So you are 100% certain that this salesman's cell phone is not provided to them and paid for by the dealership?
– MonkeyZeus
2 hours ago
add a comment |
4
This must be the most modern-day-British thing I've read today.
– Tobias Weiß
4 hours ago
2
So you are 100% certain that this salesman's cell phone is not provided to them and paid for by the dealership?
– MonkeyZeus
2 hours ago
4
4
This must be the most modern-day-British thing I've read today.
– Tobias Weiß
4 hours ago
This must be the most modern-day-British thing I've read today.
– Tobias Weiß
4 hours ago
2
2
So you are 100% certain that this salesman's cell phone is not provided to them and paid for by the dealership?
– MonkeyZeus
2 hours ago
So you are 100% certain that this salesman's cell phone is not provided to them and paid for by the dealership?
– MonkeyZeus
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is possibly but not necessarily fine.
The data controller (the garage) is responsible for safeguarding your personal data. They must take appropriate safety measures, but this depends a lot on their own risk assessment. For example, to protect the data from being used by employees for their personal purposes, the controller might use organizational measures like a policy “you're not allowed to do that.”
Many companies allow employees to use their personal devices for work purposes (BYOD). When the data controller allows this and takes appropriate safety measures, everything is perfectly fine. The company still has to make sure that the data is only processed for legal purses and deleted afterwards.
Implementing a BYOD policy in a GDPR compliant manner is difficult but not impossible.
A data breach has occurred when the security measures were insufficient and your data was deleted or disclosed without authorization. Your scenario would only be a breach if the company did not have a BYOD policy and the salesman used their personal phone, and arguably then only if that device is also breached. However, do not discount the alternatives:
- they do have a BYOD policy and the salesman is acting within their instructions
- the salesman was using a company-controlled device, not their personal phone
If you have good reason to believe that your data was mishandled (and these alternatives do not apply), then the GDPR offers you the following remedies:
- You can of course complain to the data controller, especially if they have a dedicated data protection officer.
- You can lodge a complaint with a supervision authority, which is the ICO in the UK. They expect you to attempt to resolve your issue with the controller first. The ICO can then decide if they want to investigate the issue.
- You can sue them for compliance and for actual damages suffered (you have none, though).
Note that all of these alternatives are more effort than they are likely worth. In particular, the garage can always correct the problem, e.g. by getting your contact info deleted from the personal device or by creating a retroactive BYOD policy.
Thanks for the detailed response, I think it will be a case of just taking it higher up the chain, I'm not looking for damages or anything just an acknowledgement from them that I never gave permission for him to contact me in this way.
– RyanK
6 hours ago
7
Make sure you read all the small print of any data authorization you agreed to, before you say "you never gave permission"! In fact you don't know that is WAS his personal phone - it might have been a company-issued phone for work use only.
– alephzero
4 hours ago
2
@RyanK Your permission/consent may not have been required for them to contact you via texts (might be allowed as their legitimate interest). This answer only discusses whether the sales person would have been allowed to communicate with you over a personal device.
– amon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
RyanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38695%2fsalesman-text-me-from-his-personal-phone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is possibly but not necessarily fine.
The data controller (the garage) is responsible for safeguarding your personal data. They must take appropriate safety measures, but this depends a lot on their own risk assessment. For example, to protect the data from being used by employees for their personal purposes, the controller might use organizational measures like a policy “you're not allowed to do that.”
Many companies allow employees to use their personal devices for work purposes (BYOD). When the data controller allows this and takes appropriate safety measures, everything is perfectly fine. The company still has to make sure that the data is only processed for legal purses and deleted afterwards.
Implementing a BYOD policy in a GDPR compliant manner is difficult but not impossible.
A data breach has occurred when the security measures were insufficient and your data was deleted or disclosed without authorization. Your scenario would only be a breach if the company did not have a BYOD policy and the salesman used their personal phone, and arguably then only if that device is also breached. However, do not discount the alternatives:
- they do have a BYOD policy and the salesman is acting within their instructions
- the salesman was using a company-controlled device, not their personal phone
If you have good reason to believe that your data was mishandled (and these alternatives do not apply), then the GDPR offers you the following remedies:
- You can of course complain to the data controller, especially if they have a dedicated data protection officer.
- You can lodge a complaint with a supervision authority, which is the ICO in the UK. They expect you to attempt to resolve your issue with the controller first. The ICO can then decide if they want to investigate the issue.
- You can sue them for compliance and for actual damages suffered (you have none, though).
Note that all of these alternatives are more effort than they are likely worth. In particular, the garage can always correct the problem, e.g. by getting your contact info deleted from the personal device or by creating a retroactive BYOD policy.
Thanks for the detailed response, I think it will be a case of just taking it higher up the chain, I'm not looking for damages or anything just an acknowledgement from them that I never gave permission for him to contact me in this way.
– RyanK
6 hours ago
7
Make sure you read all the small print of any data authorization you agreed to, before you say "you never gave permission"! In fact you don't know that is WAS his personal phone - it might have been a company-issued phone for work use only.
– alephzero
4 hours ago
2
@RyanK Your permission/consent may not have been required for them to contact you via texts (might be allowed as their legitimate interest). This answer only discusses whether the sales person would have been allowed to communicate with you over a personal device.
– amon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
This is possibly but not necessarily fine.
The data controller (the garage) is responsible for safeguarding your personal data. They must take appropriate safety measures, but this depends a lot on their own risk assessment. For example, to protect the data from being used by employees for their personal purposes, the controller might use organizational measures like a policy “you're not allowed to do that.”
Many companies allow employees to use their personal devices for work purposes (BYOD). When the data controller allows this and takes appropriate safety measures, everything is perfectly fine. The company still has to make sure that the data is only processed for legal purses and deleted afterwards.
Implementing a BYOD policy in a GDPR compliant manner is difficult but not impossible.
A data breach has occurred when the security measures were insufficient and your data was deleted or disclosed without authorization. Your scenario would only be a breach if the company did not have a BYOD policy and the salesman used their personal phone, and arguably then only if that device is also breached. However, do not discount the alternatives:
- they do have a BYOD policy and the salesman is acting within their instructions
- the salesman was using a company-controlled device, not their personal phone
If you have good reason to believe that your data was mishandled (and these alternatives do not apply), then the GDPR offers you the following remedies:
- You can of course complain to the data controller, especially if they have a dedicated data protection officer.
- You can lodge a complaint with a supervision authority, which is the ICO in the UK. They expect you to attempt to resolve your issue with the controller first. The ICO can then decide if they want to investigate the issue.
- You can sue them for compliance and for actual damages suffered (you have none, though).
Note that all of these alternatives are more effort than they are likely worth. In particular, the garage can always correct the problem, e.g. by getting your contact info deleted from the personal device or by creating a retroactive BYOD policy.
Thanks for the detailed response, I think it will be a case of just taking it higher up the chain, I'm not looking for damages or anything just an acknowledgement from them that I never gave permission for him to contact me in this way.
– RyanK
6 hours ago
7
Make sure you read all the small print of any data authorization you agreed to, before you say "you never gave permission"! In fact you don't know that is WAS his personal phone - it might have been a company-issued phone for work use only.
– alephzero
4 hours ago
2
@RyanK Your permission/consent may not have been required for them to contact you via texts (might be allowed as their legitimate interest). This answer only discusses whether the sales person would have been allowed to communicate with you over a personal device.
– amon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
This is possibly but not necessarily fine.
The data controller (the garage) is responsible for safeguarding your personal data. They must take appropriate safety measures, but this depends a lot on their own risk assessment. For example, to protect the data from being used by employees for their personal purposes, the controller might use organizational measures like a policy “you're not allowed to do that.”
Many companies allow employees to use their personal devices for work purposes (BYOD). When the data controller allows this and takes appropriate safety measures, everything is perfectly fine. The company still has to make sure that the data is only processed for legal purses and deleted afterwards.
Implementing a BYOD policy in a GDPR compliant manner is difficult but not impossible.
A data breach has occurred when the security measures were insufficient and your data was deleted or disclosed without authorization. Your scenario would only be a breach if the company did not have a BYOD policy and the salesman used their personal phone, and arguably then only if that device is also breached. However, do not discount the alternatives:
- they do have a BYOD policy and the salesman is acting within their instructions
- the salesman was using a company-controlled device, not their personal phone
If you have good reason to believe that your data was mishandled (and these alternatives do not apply), then the GDPR offers you the following remedies:
- You can of course complain to the data controller, especially if they have a dedicated data protection officer.
- You can lodge a complaint with a supervision authority, which is the ICO in the UK. They expect you to attempt to resolve your issue with the controller first. The ICO can then decide if they want to investigate the issue.
- You can sue them for compliance and for actual damages suffered (you have none, though).
Note that all of these alternatives are more effort than they are likely worth. In particular, the garage can always correct the problem, e.g. by getting your contact info deleted from the personal device or by creating a retroactive BYOD policy.
This is possibly but not necessarily fine.
The data controller (the garage) is responsible for safeguarding your personal data. They must take appropriate safety measures, but this depends a lot on their own risk assessment. For example, to protect the data from being used by employees for their personal purposes, the controller might use organizational measures like a policy “you're not allowed to do that.”
Many companies allow employees to use their personal devices for work purposes (BYOD). When the data controller allows this and takes appropriate safety measures, everything is perfectly fine. The company still has to make sure that the data is only processed for legal purses and deleted afterwards.
Implementing a BYOD policy in a GDPR compliant manner is difficult but not impossible.
A data breach has occurred when the security measures were insufficient and your data was deleted or disclosed without authorization. Your scenario would only be a breach if the company did not have a BYOD policy and the salesman used their personal phone, and arguably then only if that device is also breached. However, do not discount the alternatives:
- they do have a BYOD policy and the salesman is acting within their instructions
- the salesman was using a company-controlled device, not their personal phone
If you have good reason to believe that your data was mishandled (and these alternatives do not apply), then the GDPR offers you the following remedies:
- You can of course complain to the data controller, especially if they have a dedicated data protection officer.
- You can lodge a complaint with a supervision authority, which is the ICO in the UK. They expect you to attempt to resolve your issue with the controller first. The ICO can then decide if they want to investigate the issue.
- You can sue them for compliance and for actual damages suffered (you have none, though).
Note that all of these alternatives are more effort than they are likely worth. In particular, the garage can always correct the problem, e.g. by getting your contact info deleted from the personal device or by creating a retroactive BYOD policy.
answered 6 hours ago
amonamon
70915
70915
Thanks for the detailed response, I think it will be a case of just taking it higher up the chain, I'm not looking for damages or anything just an acknowledgement from them that I never gave permission for him to contact me in this way.
– RyanK
6 hours ago
7
Make sure you read all the small print of any data authorization you agreed to, before you say "you never gave permission"! In fact you don't know that is WAS his personal phone - it might have been a company-issued phone for work use only.
– alephzero
4 hours ago
2
@RyanK Your permission/consent may not have been required for them to contact you via texts (might be allowed as their legitimate interest). This answer only discusses whether the sales person would have been allowed to communicate with you over a personal device.
– amon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for the detailed response, I think it will be a case of just taking it higher up the chain, I'm not looking for damages or anything just an acknowledgement from them that I never gave permission for him to contact me in this way.
– RyanK
6 hours ago
7
Make sure you read all the small print of any data authorization you agreed to, before you say "you never gave permission"! In fact you don't know that is WAS his personal phone - it might have been a company-issued phone for work use only.
– alephzero
4 hours ago
2
@RyanK Your permission/consent may not have been required for them to contact you via texts (might be allowed as their legitimate interest). This answer only discusses whether the sales person would have been allowed to communicate with you over a personal device.
– amon
4 hours ago
Thanks for the detailed response, I think it will be a case of just taking it higher up the chain, I'm not looking for damages or anything just an acknowledgement from them that I never gave permission for him to contact me in this way.
– RyanK
6 hours ago
Thanks for the detailed response, I think it will be a case of just taking it higher up the chain, I'm not looking for damages or anything just an acknowledgement from them that I never gave permission for him to contact me in this way.
– RyanK
6 hours ago
7
7
Make sure you read all the small print of any data authorization you agreed to, before you say "you never gave permission"! In fact you don't know that is WAS his personal phone - it might have been a company-issued phone for work use only.
– alephzero
4 hours ago
Make sure you read all the small print of any data authorization you agreed to, before you say "you never gave permission"! In fact you don't know that is WAS his personal phone - it might have been a company-issued phone for work use only.
– alephzero
4 hours ago
2
2
@RyanK Your permission/consent may not have been required for them to contact you via texts (might be allowed as their legitimate interest). This answer only discusses whether the sales person would have been allowed to communicate with you over a personal device.
– amon
4 hours ago
@RyanK Your permission/consent may not have been required for them to contact you via texts (might be allowed as their legitimate interest). This answer only discusses whether the sales person would have been allowed to communicate with you over a personal device.
– amon
4 hours ago
add a comment |
RyanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RyanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RyanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RyanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38695%2fsalesman-text-me-from-his-personal-phone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
This must be the most modern-day-British thing I've read today.
– Tobias Weiß
4 hours ago
2
So you are 100% certain that this salesman's cell phone is not provided to them and paid for by the dealership?
– MonkeyZeus
2 hours ago