How do conventional missiles fly?How do conventional and T-tails differ?How are anti-aircraft missiles tested?Can jet fighter missiles descend or ascend?How are cruise missiles different from ballistic missiles?How do combat jets know when to launch flares to counter IR missiles?Can Hellfire missiles be used effectively as air-to-air weapons?Drone swarm technology on missilesWhat is the difference between “x” and “+” configuration in missiles?Why are some Tomahawk missiles' nose duck-nose shaped?How do cruise missiles stay aloft?
Obtaining database information and values in extended properties
how do we prove that a sum of two periods is still a period?
Create test of text direction (luatex)
Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd
Car headlights in a world without electricity
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?
How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?
How does allowing Sneak Attack with improvised weapons imbalance gameplay at the table?
Did 'Cinema Songs' exist during Hiranyakshipu's time?
Collected fruit by Seine's banks
How to calculate the right interval for a timelapse on a boat
What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?
Why was the shrink from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)
Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for flight for one more flight?
Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?
How to keep a dark protagonist who wants to keep his humanity dark?
In Bayesian inference, why are some terms dropped from the posterior predictive?
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Pattern for multiple renderings calling same service
Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?
How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?
How dangerous is XSS
How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?
How do conventional missiles fly?
How do conventional and T-tails differ?How are anti-aircraft missiles tested?Can jet fighter missiles descend or ascend?How are cruise missiles different from ballistic missiles?How do combat jets know when to launch flares to counter IR missiles?Can Hellfire missiles be used effectively as air-to-air weapons?Drone swarm technology on missilesWhat is the difference between “x” and “+” configuration in missiles?Why are some Tomahawk missiles' nose duck-nose shaped?How do cruise missiles stay aloft?
$begingroup$
With the exception of cruise missiles, most missiles don't have any obvious lifting device.
If you watch a missile being fired, prior to its rocket firing it does exactly what you'd expect: momentarily plummet toward the earth. And yet the moment it ignites, it stops falling completely, but without any pitch that you'd expect to counteract gravity; even big missiles like the Phoenix or HARM seem to have gravity-defying characteristics.
Missiles that fire on the rail seems to experience no drop at all.
AIM-9M launch from an FA-18F source
There's a good slow-motion video of the firing of an AMRAAM here.
Now this isn't magic, so I presume either a) the little fins make adjustments so that the rocket is, despite appearances, pointing a little downwards or b) the fins are smart enough to configure themselves to provide the lift needed to keep the missile in the air. But it might be neither.
The question is - generally, how do conventional missiles fly?
aerodynamics lift missiles
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With the exception of cruise missiles, most missiles don't have any obvious lifting device.
If you watch a missile being fired, prior to its rocket firing it does exactly what you'd expect: momentarily plummet toward the earth. And yet the moment it ignites, it stops falling completely, but without any pitch that you'd expect to counteract gravity; even big missiles like the Phoenix or HARM seem to have gravity-defying characteristics.
Missiles that fire on the rail seems to experience no drop at all.
AIM-9M launch from an FA-18F source
There's a good slow-motion video of the firing of an AMRAAM here.
Now this isn't magic, so I presume either a) the little fins make adjustments so that the rocket is, despite appearances, pointing a little downwards or b) the fins are smart enough to configure themselves to provide the lift needed to keep the missile in the air. But it might be neither.
The question is - generally, how do conventional missiles fly?
aerodynamics lift missiles
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
In that video I can see a clear pitch up motion of the missile and no horizon is in sight to judge the attitude of the airplane it's launched from.
$endgroup$
– ratchet freak
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
In the video if you look closely you can actually see that the missile is still dropping while accelerating away from the aircraft. And thats what they do, they keep dropping to gain as much distance to the aircraft as fast as possible for a bit, then resume on their course. This is done by actually pitching up.
$endgroup$
– Maverick283
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With the exception of cruise missiles, most missiles don't have any obvious lifting device.
If you watch a missile being fired, prior to its rocket firing it does exactly what you'd expect: momentarily plummet toward the earth. And yet the moment it ignites, it stops falling completely, but without any pitch that you'd expect to counteract gravity; even big missiles like the Phoenix or HARM seem to have gravity-defying characteristics.
Missiles that fire on the rail seems to experience no drop at all.
AIM-9M launch from an FA-18F source
There's a good slow-motion video of the firing of an AMRAAM here.
Now this isn't magic, so I presume either a) the little fins make adjustments so that the rocket is, despite appearances, pointing a little downwards or b) the fins are smart enough to configure themselves to provide the lift needed to keep the missile in the air. But it might be neither.
The question is - generally, how do conventional missiles fly?
aerodynamics lift missiles
$endgroup$
With the exception of cruise missiles, most missiles don't have any obvious lifting device.
If you watch a missile being fired, prior to its rocket firing it does exactly what you'd expect: momentarily plummet toward the earth. And yet the moment it ignites, it stops falling completely, but without any pitch that you'd expect to counteract gravity; even big missiles like the Phoenix or HARM seem to have gravity-defying characteristics.
Missiles that fire on the rail seems to experience no drop at all.
AIM-9M launch from an FA-18F source
There's a good slow-motion video of the firing of an AMRAAM here.
Now this isn't magic, so I presume either a) the little fins make adjustments so that the rocket is, despite appearances, pointing a little downwards or b) the fins are smart enough to configure themselves to provide the lift needed to keep the missile in the air. But it might be neither.
The question is - generally, how do conventional missiles fly?
aerodynamics lift missiles
aerodynamics lift missiles
asked 8 hours ago
Party ArkParty Ark
2,65511636
2,65511636
1
$begingroup$
In that video I can see a clear pitch up motion of the missile and no horizon is in sight to judge the attitude of the airplane it's launched from.
$endgroup$
– ratchet freak
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
In the video if you look closely you can actually see that the missile is still dropping while accelerating away from the aircraft. And thats what they do, they keep dropping to gain as much distance to the aircraft as fast as possible for a bit, then resume on their course. This is done by actually pitching up.
$endgroup$
– Maverick283
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
In that video I can see a clear pitch up motion of the missile and no horizon is in sight to judge the attitude of the airplane it's launched from.
$endgroup$
– ratchet freak
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
In the video if you look closely you can actually see that the missile is still dropping while accelerating away from the aircraft. And thats what they do, they keep dropping to gain as much distance to the aircraft as fast as possible for a bit, then resume on their course. This is done by actually pitching up.
$endgroup$
– Maverick283
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
In that video I can see a clear pitch up motion of the missile and no horizon is in sight to judge the attitude of the airplane it's launched from.
$endgroup$
– ratchet freak
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In that video I can see a clear pitch up motion of the missile and no horizon is in sight to judge the attitude of the airplane it's launched from.
$endgroup$
– ratchet freak
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
In the video if you look closely you can actually see that the missile is still dropping while accelerating away from the aircraft. And thats what they do, they keep dropping to gain as much distance to the aircraft as fast as possible for a bit, then resume on their course. This is done by actually pitching up.
$endgroup$
– Maverick283
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the video if you look closely you can actually see that the missile is still dropping while accelerating away from the aircraft. And thats what they do, they keep dropping to gain as much distance to the aircraft as fast as possible for a bit, then resume on their course. This is done by actually pitching up.
$endgroup$
– Maverick283
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Guided missiles are little airplanes. If there are only fins at the tail, it's a ballistic rocket, basically a fin stabilized artillery shell accelerated by a rocket motor instead of an explosion in a pipe.
On missile like AMRAAM, Sidewinder, or Sparrow, the vanes are wings and the missile is a rocket powered aircraft that can climb, descend and turn as required. The vanes/wings don't have to be very big because the thing is going superdupersonic. The X plan form means the wings can support and control the missile equally well in any axial position.
The front vanes are movable and do the controlling. It's effectively a rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission, really.
Since the missile accelerates to >Mach pretty quickly and operates supersonically, the wings/vanes use a supersonic airfoil profile, either biconvex (like the F-104's airfoil) or a diamond profile. The vanes on the AIM-9M look like biconvex airfoils.
The missile descends when it is first launched because it's going too slowly for its teeny tiny supersonic wings to do enough lifting, and has to accelerate first.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 for "rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission"
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The missile's wings are very large for it's mass, and produce a great deal more lift than the wings of the aircraft firing the missile.
One thing to note from the OP's linked video is that the F-35 and the chase plane are traveling at the same speed, so the F-35 appears stationary. However, that aircraft is likely traveling in excess of 0.8 Mach. Therefore, upon release, the missile is also traveling at 0.8 Mach. The large wings provide plenty of lift. Some missiles may thrust vector as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61905%2fhow-do-conventional-missiles-fly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Guided missiles are little airplanes. If there are only fins at the tail, it's a ballistic rocket, basically a fin stabilized artillery shell accelerated by a rocket motor instead of an explosion in a pipe.
On missile like AMRAAM, Sidewinder, or Sparrow, the vanes are wings and the missile is a rocket powered aircraft that can climb, descend and turn as required. The vanes/wings don't have to be very big because the thing is going superdupersonic. The X plan form means the wings can support and control the missile equally well in any axial position.
The front vanes are movable and do the controlling. It's effectively a rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission, really.
Since the missile accelerates to >Mach pretty quickly and operates supersonically, the wings/vanes use a supersonic airfoil profile, either biconvex (like the F-104's airfoil) or a diamond profile. The vanes on the AIM-9M look like biconvex airfoils.
The missile descends when it is first launched because it's going too slowly for its teeny tiny supersonic wings to do enough lifting, and has to accelerate first.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 for "rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission"
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Guided missiles are little airplanes. If there are only fins at the tail, it's a ballistic rocket, basically a fin stabilized artillery shell accelerated by a rocket motor instead of an explosion in a pipe.
On missile like AMRAAM, Sidewinder, or Sparrow, the vanes are wings and the missile is a rocket powered aircraft that can climb, descend and turn as required. The vanes/wings don't have to be very big because the thing is going superdupersonic. The X plan form means the wings can support and control the missile equally well in any axial position.
The front vanes are movable and do the controlling. It's effectively a rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission, really.
Since the missile accelerates to >Mach pretty quickly and operates supersonically, the wings/vanes use a supersonic airfoil profile, either biconvex (like the F-104's airfoil) or a diamond profile. The vanes on the AIM-9M look like biconvex airfoils.
The missile descends when it is first launched because it's going too slowly for its teeny tiny supersonic wings to do enough lifting, and has to accelerate first.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
+1 for "rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission"
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Guided missiles are little airplanes. If there are only fins at the tail, it's a ballistic rocket, basically a fin stabilized artillery shell accelerated by a rocket motor instead of an explosion in a pipe.
On missile like AMRAAM, Sidewinder, or Sparrow, the vanes are wings and the missile is a rocket powered aircraft that can climb, descend and turn as required. The vanes/wings don't have to be very big because the thing is going superdupersonic. The X plan form means the wings can support and control the missile equally well in any axial position.
The front vanes are movable and do the controlling. It's effectively a rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission, really.
Since the missile accelerates to >Mach pretty quickly and operates supersonically, the wings/vanes use a supersonic airfoil profile, either biconvex (like the F-104's airfoil) or a diamond profile. The vanes on the AIM-9M look like biconvex airfoils.
The missile descends when it is first launched because it's going too slowly for its teeny tiny supersonic wings to do enough lifting, and has to accelerate first.
$endgroup$
Guided missiles are little airplanes. If there are only fins at the tail, it's a ballistic rocket, basically a fin stabilized artillery shell accelerated by a rocket motor instead of an explosion in a pipe.
On missile like AMRAAM, Sidewinder, or Sparrow, the vanes are wings and the missile is a rocket powered aircraft that can climb, descend and turn as required. The vanes/wings don't have to be very big because the thing is going superdupersonic. The X plan form means the wings can support and control the missile equally well in any axial position.
The front vanes are movable and do the controlling. It's effectively a rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission, really.
Since the missile accelerates to >Mach pretty quickly and operates supersonically, the wings/vanes use a supersonic airfoil profile, either biconvex (like the F-104's airfoil) or a diamond profile. The vanes on the AIM-9M look like biconvex airfoils.
The missile descends when it is first launched because it's going too slowly for its teeny tiny supersonic wings to do enough lifting, and has to accelerate first.
answered 5 hours ago
John KJohn K
23.9k13373
23.9k13373
1
$begingroup$
+1 for "rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission"
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
+1 for "rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission"
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
+1 for "rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission"
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
+1 for "rocket powered robot canard aircraft on a suicide mission"
$endgroup$
– T.J.L.
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The missile's wings are very large for it's mass, and produce a great deal more lift than the wings of the aircraft firing the missile.
One thing to note from the OP's linked video is that the F-35 and the chase plane are traveling at the same speed, so the F-35 appears stationary. However, that aircraft is likely traveling in excess of 0.8 Mach. Therefore, upon release, the missile is also traveling at 0.8 Mach. The large wings provide plenty of lift. Some missiles may thrust vector as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The missile's wings are very large for it's mass, and produce a great deal more lift than the wings of the aircraft firing the missile.
One thing to note from the OP's linked video is that the F-35 and the chase plane are traveling at the same speed, so the F-35 appears stationary. However, that aircraft is likely traveling in excess of 0.8 Mach. Therefore, upon release, the missile is also traveling at 0.8 Mach. The large wings provide plenty of lift. Some missiles may thrust vector as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The missile's wings are very large for it's mass, and produce a great deal more lift than the wings of the aircraft firing the missile.
One thing to note from the OP's linked video is that the F-35 and the chase plane are traveling at the same speed, so the F-35 appears stationary. However, that aircraft is likely traveling in excess of 0.8 Mach. Therefore, upon release, the missile is also traveling at 0.8 Mach. The large wings provide plenty of lift. Some missiles may thrust vector as well.
$endgroup$
The missile's wings are very large for it's mass, and produce a great deal more lift than the wings of the aircraft firing the missile.
One thing to note from the OP's linked video is that the F-35 and the chase plane are traveling at the same speed, so the F-35 appears stationary. However, that aircraft is likely traveling in excess of 0.8 Mach. Therefore, upon release, the missile is also traveling at 0.8 Mach. The large wings provide plenty of lift. Some missiles may thrust vector as well.
answered 1 hour ago
dotancohendotancohen
3,61522147
3,61522147
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61905%2fhow-do-conventional-missiles-fly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
In that video I can see a clear pitch up motion of the missile and no horizon is in sight to judge the attitude of the airplane it's launched from.
$endgroup$
– ratchet freak
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
In the video if you look closely you can actually see that the missile is still dropping while accelerating away from the aircraft. And thats what they do, they keep dropping to gain as much distance to the aircraft as fast as possible for a bit, then resume on their course. This is done by actually pitching up.
$endgroup$
– Maverick283
5 hours ago