When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?Reading handwritingWriting sheets generatorDoes a similar system to a pangram exist for handwriting practiceHow to learn to read Chinese calligraphic paintings (and Chinese handwriting)?Bottom component of 青 and 䏍Stroke order of 㠭Handwriting Certain RadicalsDo characters like 司, 习, and 可 have different first strokes?Is it incorrect to write 少 with a hooked first stroke, like 小?Does cursive script have any order logic?
Do parry bonuses stack?
How to calculate the right interval for a timelapse on a boat
Pattern for multiple renderings calling same service
What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?
Why was the shrink from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)
Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for flight for one more flight?
How dangerous is XSS
Concerning the definitions of the enthalpy, the Helmholtz free energy and the Gibbs free energy of a system
Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions
how do we prove that a sum of two periods is still a period?
That's an odd coin - I wonder why
How does allowing Sneak Attack with improvised weapons imbalance gameplay at the table?
Connect points with lines QGIS
In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?
How to keep a dark protagonist who wants to keep his humanity dark?
Why do I get "Binary file matches" with grep -I?
Is it possible to create a QR code using text?
Car headlights in a world without electricity
Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?
How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?
Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?
Processor speed limited at 0.4 Ghz
magento 2 Incompatible argument type: Required type: MagentoFrameworkRegistry
When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?
Reading handwritingWriting sheets generatorDoes a similar system to a pangram exist for handwriting practiceHow to learn to read Chinese calligraphic paintings (and Chinese handwriting)?Bottom component of 青 and 䏍Stroke order of 㠭Handwriting Certain RadicalsDo characters like 司, 习, and 可 have different first strokes?Is it incorrect to write 少 with a hooked first stroke, like 小?Does cursive script have any order logic?
Question: When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?
Specifically, this is what I have in mind:
Is the one on the left in the above image incorrect?
handwriting
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
add a comment |
Question: When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?
Specifically, this is what I have in mind:
Is the one on the left in the above image incorrect?
handwriting
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
add a comment |
Question: When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?
Specifically, this is what I have in mind:
Is the one on the left in the above image incorrect?
handwriting
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
Question: When handwriting 黄 (huáng; yellow) is it incorrect to have a disconnected 草 (cǎo; grass) radical on top?
Specifically, this is what I have in mind:
Is the one on the left in the above image incorrect?
handwriting
handwriting
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
asked 5 hours ago
Becky 李蓓Becky 李蓓
2,38411046
2,38411046
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Neither the PRC form「黄」nor the ROC/HK form「黃」contains「艸・艹」. The top of the PRC form「黄」is written as「龷」.
商
甲
甲806
合集32509商
甲
京津636
西周
金
耳尊
集成6007
「黃」originally depicted a person「大」with a swollen chest/abdomen as a kind of deformity/sickness, indicating the meaning weak, feeble; a mouth「口」was added to the top later, emphasising the person sighing in distress. The word that「黃」originally represented is now written as「尪」.
The modern descendant shapes from the above are:
ROC/HK form:
東周・秦
石鼓
汧殹
今
楷・臺標
今
楷・港標
PRC form:
秦
簡
睡・秦34
東漢
隸
張遷碑
今
楷・陸標
As can be seen, there was never a「艸・艹」component in the character.
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
add a comment |
The character 草 was written as 艸 (combined with two 屮-s) at first, the component 早 below was added later, while the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form.
The character 黄 is a simplified Chinese character, the traditional form is 黃, which is combined with 廿, 一, 田 (or 由 sometimes) and 八, there is no relationship with 艹.
The handwriting in your picture may be incorrect, I searched in Google and I didn't find any version like yours. You could changed it to 廿 (traditional form) or 龷 (simplified form).
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
I had to downvote this for the rather ludicrous statement that “the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form”. There is absolutely nothing wrong about the three-stroke radical variant of 艸 in simplified characters (nor indeed in traditional characters when it is used there).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
8 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "371"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33475%2fwhen-handwriting-%25e9%25bb%2584-hu%25c3%25a1ng-yellow-is-it-incorrect-to-have-a-disconnected-%25e8%258d%2589-c%25c7%258eo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Neither the PRC form「黄」nor the ROC/HK form「黃」contains「艸・艹」. The top of the PRC form「黄」is written as「龷」.
商
甲
甲806
合集32509商
甲
京津636
西周
金
耳尊
集成6007
「黃」originally depicted a person「大」with a swollen chest/abdomen as a kind of deformity/sickness, indicating the meaning weak, feeble; a mouth「口」was added to the top later, emphasising the person sighing in distress. The word that「黃」originally represented is now written as「尪」.
The modern descendant shapes from the above are:
ROC/HK form:
東周・秦
石鼓
汧殹
今
楷・臺標
今
楷・港標
PRC form:
秦
簡
睡・秦34
東漢
隸
張遷碑
今
楷・陸標
As can be seen, there was never a「艸・艹」component in the character.
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
add a comment |
Neither the PRC form「黄」nor the ROC/HK form「黃」contains「艸・艹」. The top of the PRC form「黄」is written as「龷」.
商
甲
甲806
合集32509商
甲
京津636
西周
金
耳尊
集成6007
「黃」originally depicted a person「大」with a swollen chest/abdomen as a kind of deformity/sickness, indicating the meaning weak, feeble; a mouth「口」was added to the top later, emphasising the person sighing in distress. The word that「黃」originally represented is now written as「尪」.
The modern descendant shapes from the above are:
ROC/HK form:
東周・秦
石鼓
汧殹
今
楷・臺標
今
楷・港標
PRC form:
秦
簡
睡・秦34
東漢
隸
張遷碑
今
楷・陸標
As can be seen, there was never a「艸・艹」component in the character.
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
add a comment |
Neither the PRC form「黄」nor the ROC/HK form「黃」contains「艸・艹」. The top of the PRC form「黄」is written as「龷」.
商
甲
甲806
合集32509商
甲
京津636
西周
金
耳尊
集成6007
「黃」originally depicted a person「大」with a swollen chest/abdomen as a kind of deformity/sickness, indicating the meaning weak, feeble; a mouth「口」was added to the top later, emphasising the person sighing in distress. The word that「黃」originally represented is now written as「尪」.
The modern descendant shapes from the above are:
ROC/HK form:
東周・秦
石鼓
汧殹
今
楷・臺標
今
楷・港標
PRC form:
秦
簡
睡・秦34
東漢
隸
張遷碑
今
楷・陸標
As can be seen, there was never a「艸・艹」component in the character.
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
Neither the PRC form「黄」nor the ROC/HK form「黃」contains「艸・艹」. The top of the PRC form「黄」is written as「龷」.
商
甲
甲806
合集32509商
甲
京津636
西周
金
耳尊
集成6007
「黃」originally depicted a person「大」with a swollen chest/abdomen as a kind of deformity/sickness, indicating the meaning weak, feeble; a mouth「口」was added to the top later, emphasising the person sighing in distress. The word that「黃」originally represented is now written as「尪」.
The modern descendant shapes from the above are:
ROC/HK form:
東周・秦
石鼓
汧殹
今
楷・臺標
今
楷・港標
PRC form:
秦
簡
睡・秦34
東漢
隸
張遷碑
今
楷・陸標
As can be seen, there was never a「艸・艹」component in the character.
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
answered 3 hours ago
drooozedroooze
8,5551922
8,5551922
add a comment |
add a comment |
The character 草 was written as 艸 (combined with two 屮-s) at first, the component 早 below was added later, while the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form.
The character 黄 is a simplified Chinese character, the traditional form is 黃, which is combined with 廿, 一, 田 (or 由 sometimes) and 八, there is no relationship with 艹.
The handwriting in your picture may be incorrect, I searched in Google and I didn't find any version like yours. You could changed it to 廿 (traditional form) or 龷 (simplified form).
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
I had to downvote this for the rather ludicrous statement that “the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form”. There is absolutely nothing wrong about the three-stroke radical variant of 艸 in simplified characters (nor indeed in traditional characters when it is used there).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
8 mins ago
add a comment |
The character 草 was written as 艸 (combined with two 屮-s) at first, the component 早 below was added later, while the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form.
The character 黄 is a simplified Chinese character, the traditional form is 黃, which is combined with 廿, 一, 田 (or 由 sometimes) and 八, there is no relationship with 艹.
The handwriting in your picture may be incorrect, I searched in Google and I didn't find any version like yours. You could changed it to 廿 (traditional form) or 龷 (simplified form).
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
I had to downvote this for the rather ludicrous statement that “the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form”. There is absolutely nothing wrong about the three-stroke radical variant of 艸 in simplified characters (nor indeed in traditional characters when it is used there).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
8 mins ago
add a comment |
The character 草 was written as 艸 (combined with two 屮-s) at first, the component 早 below was added later, while the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form.
The character 黄 is a simplified Chinese character, the traditional form is 黃, which is combined with 廿, 一, 田 (or 由 sometimes) and 八, there is no relationship with 艹.
The handwriting in your picture may be incorrect, I searched in Google and I didn't find any version like yours. You could changed it to 廿 (traditional form) or 龷 (simplified form).
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
The character 草 was written as 艸 (combined with two 屮-s) at first, the component 早 below was added later, while the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form.
The character 黄 is a simplified Chinese character, the traditional form is 黃, which is combined with 廿, 一, 田 (or 由 sometimes) and 八, there is no relationship with 艹.
The handwriting in your picture may be incorrect, I searched in Google and I didn't find any version like yours. You could changed it to 廿 (traditional form) or 龷 (simplified form).
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
answered 4 hours ago
賈可 Jacky賈可 Jacky
88416
88416
I had to downvote this for the rather ludicrous statement that “the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form”. There is absolutely nothing wrong about the three-stroke radical variant of 艸 in simplified characters (nor indeed in traditional characters when it is used there).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
8 mins ago
add a comment |
I had to downvote this for the rather ludicrous statement that “the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form”. There is absolutely nothing wrong about the three-stroke radical variant of 艸 in simplified characters (nor indeed in traditional characters when it is used there).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
8 mins ago
I had to downvote this for the rather ludicrous statement that “the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form”. There is absolutely nothing wrong about the three-stroke radical variant of 艸 in simplified characters (nor indeed in traditional characters when it is used there).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
8 mins ago
I had to downvote this for the rather ludicrous statement that “the component 艹 in modern simplified Chinese is absolutely a wrong form”. There is absolutely nothing wrong about the three-stroke radical variant of 艸 in simplified characters (nor indeed in traditional characters when it is used there).
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
8 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chinese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33475%2fwhen-handwriting-%25e9%25bb%2584-hu%25c3%25a1ng-yellow-is-it-incorrect-to-have-a-disconnected-%25e8%258d%2589-c%25c7%258eo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
