Does Dispel Magic work on Tiny Hut?Antimagic field vs 9th-level globe of invulnerability: who wins?Leomund's Tiny Hut — only the caster can't exit and enter at will?Can a Large creature enter Leomund's Tiny Hut from below?Are water and gasses 'objects', for the purposes of Leomund's Tiny Hut?Is Leomund's Tiny Turret of Sneak Attacks feasible?What Happens When The Ground Drops from Under a Tiny Hut?What happens if I cast Leomund's Tiny Hut in a space too small to contain the dome?Can a character actually stand on the floor of Leomund's Tiny Hut, or would they fall through?Can Dimension Door be cast into Leomund's Tiny Hut?Should Leomund's Tiny Hut keep enemies out?Realistically, does Leomund’s Tiny Hut allow for indefinite long rests in a dungeon?
Could neural networks be considered metaheuristics?
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
Notepad++ delete until colon for every line with replace all
Different meanings of こわい
Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions
How to show a landlord what we have in savings?
Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?
My singleton can be called multiple times
Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd
Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
How to install cross-compiler on Ubuntu 18.04?
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?
How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?
Processor speed limited at 0.4 Ghz
Why do I get negative height?
How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?
How do conventional missiles fly?
What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?
Can someone clarify Hamming's notion of important problems in relation to modern academia?
How do I exit BASH while loop using modulus operator?
How can a day be of 24 hours?
Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Does Dispel Magic work on Tiny Hut?
Antimagic field vs 9th-level globe of invulnerability: who wins?Leomund's Tiny Hut — only the caster can't exit and enter at will?Can a Large creature enter Leomund's Tiny Hut from below?Are water and gasses 'objects', for the purposes of Leomund's Tiny Hut?Is Leomund's Tiny Turret of Sneak Attacks feasible?What Happens When The Ground Drops from Under a Tiny Hut?What happens if I cast Leomund's Tiny Hut in a space too small to contain the dome?Can a character actually stand on the floor of Leomund's Tiny Hut, or would they fall through?Can Dimension Door be cast into Leomund's Tiny Hut?Should Leomund's Tiny Hut keep enemies out?Realistically, does Leomund’s Tiny Hut allow for indefinite long rests in a dungeon?
$begingroup$
Over the weekened one of my players stumped me when she made the claim that Dispel Magic wouldn't work on Tiny Hut due to these lines:
Creatures and objects within the dome when you cast this spell can
move through it freely. All other creatures and objects are barred
from passing through it. Spells and other magical effects can't extend
through the dome or be cast through it.
I folded and just went along with the players, but my interpretation was that Tiny Hut has the ability to block magical spells but is limited to those which are trying to go through it -- not spells cast at the barrier itself, right?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Over the weekened one of my players stumped me when she made the claim that Dispel Magic wouldn't work on Tiny Hut due to these lines:
Creatures and objects within the dome when you cast this spell can
move through it freely. All other creatures and objects are barred
from passing through it. Spells and other magical effects can't extend
through the dome or be cast through it.
I folded and just went along with the players, but my interpretation was that Tiny Hut has the ability to block magical spells but is limited to those which are trying to go through it -- not spells cast at the barrier itself, right?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
We sure could use a tiny-hut tag right about now....
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Over the weekened one of my players stumped me when she made the claim that Dispel Magic wouldn't work on Tiny Hut due to these lines:
Creatures and objects within the dome when you cast this spell can
move through it freely. All other creatures and objects are barred
from passing through it. Spells and other magical effects can't extend
through the dome or be cast through it.
I folded and just went along with the players, but my interpretation was that Tiny Hut has the ability to block magical spells but is limited to those which are trying to go through it -- not spells cast at the barrier itself, right?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
Over the weekened one of my players stumped me when she made the claim that Dispel Magic wouldn't work on Tiny Hut due to these lines:
Creatures and objects within the dome when you cast this spell can
move through it freely. All other creatures and objects are barred
from passing through it. Spells and other magical effects can't extend
through the dome or be cast through it.
I folded and just went along with the players, but my interpretation was that Tiny Hut has the ability to block magical spells but is limited to those which are trying to go through it -- not spells cast at the barrier itself, right?
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
asked 4 hours ago
AshRandomAshRandom
2,44711541
2,44711541
$begingroup$
We sure could use a tiny-hut tag right about now....
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We sure could use a tiny-hut tag right about now....
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
We sure could use a tiny-hut tag right about now....
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
We sure could use a tiny-hut tag right about now....
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are correct, dispel magic will work on the hut.
Spells and other magical effects can't extend through the dome or be cast through it.
Casting dispel magic would be casting a spell at the hut, not through it (eg to a target inside or on the other side of it). A caster standing on the outside of the barrier casting a dispel magic at it, would be targeting the barrier and would not require the spell being cast to travel through the barrier itself.
Thus, there is no reason why dispel magic would not work on it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tiny Hut blocks spells on creatures or objects inside the hut; but does not block spells on itself
To give a concrete example: If a spellcaster were to cast Dispel Magic on a creature that they knew was inside the dome, the spell would fail, regardless of whether they were physically capable of seeing their target or not (a circumstance that is contingent on, among other things, whether the inside were darkened or not, per the spell description).
But if that same spellcaster were to target the hut itself, the hut would be eliminated. There aren't rules in 5th edition that adjudicate the idea that Dispel Magic—or any other kind of abjuration magic—is required to "pass through" its target as part of the mechanism of affecting it; there's only the implied requirement that a spell must reach a target, passing through any obstacles between the caster and its target. As a result, a spellcaster casting such a spell would only have to make the spell "pass through" the hut if the spell specifically says that's what it does, which Dispel Magic does not.
Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends. For each spell of 4th level or higher on the target, make an ability check using your spellcasting ability. The DC equals 10 + the spell's level. On a successful check, the spell ends.
—Dispel Magic, Player's Handbook, pg. 234
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, this is the same logic for why Antimagic Field beats Globe of Invulnerability: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/128354/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends." If you target the Tiny Hut, there is no spell on it. And you can't target anything inside. Probably just unfortunate wording, still.
$endgroup$
– András
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144407%2fdoes-dispel-magic-work-on-tiny-hut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are correct, dispel magic will work on the hut.
Spells and other magical effects can't extend through the dome or be cast through it.
Casting dispel magic would be casting a spell at the hut, not through it (eg to a target inside or on the other side of it). A caster standing on the outside of the barrier casting a dispel magic at it, would be targeting the barrier and would not require the spell being cast to travel through the barrier itself.
Thus, there is no reason why dispel magic would not work on it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct, dispel magic will work on the hut.
Spells and other magical effects can't extend through the dome or be cast through it.
Casting dispel magic would be casting a spell at the hut, not through it (eg to a target inside or on the other side of it). A caster standing on the outside of the barrier casting a dispel magic at it, would be targeting the barrier and would not require the spell being cast to travel through the barrier itself.
Thus, there is no reason why dispel magic would not work on it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are correct, dispel magic will work on the hut.
Spells and other magical effects can't extend through the dome or be cast through it.
Casting dispel magic would be casting a spell at the hut, not through it (eg to a target inside or on the other side of it). A caster standing on the outside of the barrier casting a dispel magic at it, would be targeting the barrier and would not require the spell being cast to travel through the barrier itself.
Thus, there is no reason why dispel magic would not work on it.
$endgroup$
You are correct, dispel magic will work on the hut.
Spells and other magical effects can't extend through the dome or be cast through it.
Casting dispel magic would be casting a spell at the hut, not through it (eg to a target inside or on the other side of it). A caster standing on the outside of the barrier casting a dispel magic at it, would be targeting the barrier and would not require the spell being cast to travel through the barrier itself.
Thus, there is no reason why dispel magic would not work on it.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
RubiksmooseRubiksmoose
60.1k10287443
60.1k10287443
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tiny Hut blocks spells on creatures or objects inside the hut; but does not block spells on itself
To give a concrete example: If a spellcaster were to cast Dispel Magic on a creature that they knew was inside the dome, the spell would fail, regardless of whether they were physically capable of seeing their target or not (a circumstance that is contingent on, among other things, whether the inside were darkened or not, per the spell description).
But if that same spellcaster were to target the hut itself, the hut would be eliminated. There aren't rules in 5th edition that adjudicate the idea that Dispel Magic—or any other kind of abjuration magic—is required to "pass through" its target as part of the mechanism of affecting it; there's only the implied requirement that a spell must reach a target, passing through any obstacles between the caster and its target. As a result, a spellcaster casting such a spell would only have to make the spell "pass through" the hut if the spell specifically says that's what it does, which Dispel Magic does not.
Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends. For each spell of 4th level or higher on the target, make an ability check using your spellcasting ability. The DC equals 10 + the spell's level. On a successful check, the spell ends.
—Dispel Magic, Player's Handbook, pg. 234
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, this is the same logic for why Antimagic Field beats Globe of Invulnerability: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/128354/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends." If you target the Tiny Hut, there is no spell on it. And you can't target anything inside. Probably just unfortunate wording, still.
$endgroup$
– András
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tiny Hut blocks spells on creatures or objects inside the hut; but does not block spells on itself
To give a concrete example: If a spellcaster were to cast Dispel Magic on a creature that they knew was inside the dome, the spell would fail, regardless of whether they were physically capable of seeing their target or not (a circumstance that is contingent on, among other things, whether the inside were darkened or not, per the spell description).
But if that same spellcaster were to target the hut itself, the hut would be eliminated. There aren't rules in 5th edition that adjudicate the idea that Dispel Magic—or any other kind of abjuration magic—is required to "pass through" its target as part of the mechanism of affecting it; there's only the implied requirement that a spell must reach a target, passing through any obstacles between the caster and its target. As a result, a spellcaster casting such a spell would only have to make the spell "pass through" the hut if the spell specifically says that's what it does, which Dispel Magic does not.
Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends. For each spell of 4th level or higher on the target, make an ability check using your spellcasting ability. The DC equals 10 + the spell's level. On a successful check, the spell ends.
—Dispel Magic, Player's Handbook, pg. 234
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, this is the same logic for why Antimagic Field beats Globe of Invulnerability: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/128354/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends." If you target the Tiny Hut, there is no spell on it. And you can't target anything inside. Probably just unfortunate wording, still.
$endgroup$
– András
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Tiny Hut blocks spells on creatures or objects inside the hut; but does not block spells on itself
To give a concrete example: If a spellcaster were to cast Dispel Magic on a creature that they knew was inside the dome, the spell would fail, regardless of whether they were physically capable of seeing their target or not (a circumstance that is contingent on, among other things, whether the inside were darkened or not, per the spell description).
But if that same spellcaster were to target the hut itself, the hut would be eliminated. There aren't rules in 5th edition that adjudicate the idea that Dispel Magic—or any other kind of abjuration magic—is required to "pass through" its target as part of the mechanism of affecting it; there's only the implied requirement that a spell must reach a target, passing through any obstacles between the caster and its target. As a result, a spellcaster casting such a spell would only have to make the spell "pass through" the hut if the spell specifically says that's what it does, which Dispel Magic does not.
Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends. For each spell of 4th level or higher on the target, make an ability check using your spellcasting ability. The DC equals 10 + the spell's level. On a successful check, the spell ends.
—Dispel Magic, Player's Handbook, pg. 234
$endgroup$
Tiny Hut blocks spells on creatures or objects inside the hut; but does not block spells on itself
To give a concrete example: If a spellcaster were to cast Dispel Magic on a creature that they knew was inside the dome, the spell would fail, regardless of whether they were physically capable of seeing their target or not (a circumstance that is contingent on, among other things, whether the inside were darkened or not, per the spell description).
But if that same spellcaster were to target the hut itself, the hut would be eliminated. There aren't rules in 5th edition that adjudicate the idea that Dispel Magic—or any other kind of abjuration magic—is required to "pass through" its target as part of the mechanism of affecting it; there's only the implied requirement that a spell must reach a target, passing through any obstacles between the caster and its target. As a result, a spellcaster casting such a spell would only have to make the spell "pass through" the hut if the spell specifically says that's what it does, which Dispel Magic does not.
Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends. For each spell of 4th level or higher on the target, make an ability check using your spellcasting ability. The DC equals 10 + the spell's level. On a successful check, the spell ends.
—Dispel Magic, Player's Handbook, pg. 234
answered 3 hours ago
XiremaXirema
23.1k268134
23.1k268134
$begingroup$
Yes, this is the same logic for why Antimagic Field beats Globe of Invulnerability: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/128354/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends." If you target the Tiny Hut, there is no spell on it. And you can't target anything inside. Probably just unfortunate wording, still.
$endgroup$
– András
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, this is the same logic for why Antimagic Field beats Globe of Invulnerability: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/128354/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends." If you target the Tiny Hut, there is no spell on it. And you can't target anything inside. Probably just unfortunate wording, still.
$endgroup$
– András
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, this is the same logic for why Antimagic Field beats Globe of Invulnerability: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/128354/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, this is the same logic for why Antimagic Field beats Globe of Invulnerability: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/128354/…
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends." If you target the Tiny Hut, there is no spell on it. And you can't target anything inside. Probably just unfortunate wording, still.
$endgroup$
– András
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Choose one creature, object, or magical effect within range. Any spell of 3rd level or lower on the target ends." If you target the Tiny Hut, there is no spell on it. And you can't target anything inside. Probably just unfortunate wording, still.
$endgroup$
– András
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144407%2fdoes-dispel-magic-work-on-tiny-hut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
We sure could use a tiny-hut tag right about now....
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
3 hours ago