Coordinate position not preciseWith TikZ, How do I use a labeled coordinate that's inside a node?Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ: text along path as nodeHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ/ERD: node (=Entity) label on the insideTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of them
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?
Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?
How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"
Minimal reference content
Finding all intervals that match predicate in vector
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be
Greatest common substring
What defines a dissertation?
How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?
Coordinate position not precise
Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing
Is a roofing delivery truck likely to crack my driveway slab?
What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?
How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?
Best way to store options for panels
What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?
Valid Badminton Score?
How to prove that the query oracle is unitary?
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?
Are there any comparative studies done between Ashtavakra Gita and Buddhim?
Coordinate position not precise
With TikZ, How do I use a labeled coordinate that's inside a node?Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ: text along path as nodeHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ/ERD: node (=Entity) label on the insideTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of them
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:

Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
add a comment |
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:

Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply saydraw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);which will work fine whenA1is a coordinate.
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:

Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:

Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
tikz-pgf coordinates
asked 3 hours ago
Thevesh ThevaThevesh Theva
519114
519114
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply saydraw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);which will work fine whenA1is a coordinate.
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply saydraw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);which will work fine whenA1is a coordinate.
– marmot
2 hours ago
1
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply say
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.– marmot
2 hours ago
Node's have finite size and you can simply say
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument

1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
2 hours ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennodeandcoordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
1 hour ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
50 mins ago
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:

documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481586%2fcoordinate-position-not-precise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument

1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
2 hours ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennodeandcoordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
1 hour ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument

1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
2 hours ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennodeandcoordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
1 hour ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument

Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument

answered 2 hours ago
marmotmarmot
112k5141267
112k5141267
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
2 hours ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennodeandcoordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
1 hour ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
50 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
2 hours ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennodeandcoordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
1 hour ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
50 mins ago
1
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
2 hours ago
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
2 hours ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between
node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.– Kpym
1 hour ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between
node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.– Kpym
1 hour ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
50 mins ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
50 mins ago
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:

documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:

documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:

documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:

documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
ZarkoZarko
128k868167
128k868167
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481586%2fcoordinate-position-not-precise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply say
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);which will work fine whenA1is a coordinate.– marmot
2 hours ago