How is the partial sum of a geometric sequence calculated?general formula for partial sum of seriesFinite sum k*x^kgeneral formula for partial sum of seriesFind the sum of the convergent seriesHow do I find the value of a partial sum without calculator?How to Recognize a Geometric SeriesFind the sum of the sequence?How to represent this partial sum?Can the infinite sum of $frac2^2k-15^k+3$ be calculated with the formula of geometric series?Partial sum of general harmonic seriesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationlimit with sum and geometric progression
Are dual Irish/British citizens bound by the 90/180 day rule when travelling in the EU after Brexit?
Writing in a Christian voice
Unfrosted light bulb
Help rendering a complicated sum/product formula
Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5 feet of movement?
When did antialiasing start being available?
Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables
Does .bashrc contain syntax errors?
How could an airship be repaired midflight?
Probably overheated black color SMD pads
Turning a hard to access nut?
Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?
Comment Box for Substitution Method of Integrals
What is the English word for a graduation award?
Can a medieval gyroplane be built?
Describing a chess game in a novel
Do US professors/group leaders only get a salary, but no group budget?
Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?
In what cases must I use 了 and in what cases not?
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
Calculate the frequency of characters in a string
Why is there so much iron?
Maths symbols and unicode-math input inside siunitx commands
Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space?
How is the partial sum of a geometric sequence calculated?
general formula for partial sum of seriesFinite sum k*x^kgeneral formula for partial sum of seriesFind the sum of the convergent seriesHow do I find the value of a partial sum without calculator?How to Recognize a Geometric SeriesFind the sum of the sequence?How to represent this partial sum?Can the infinite sum of $frac2^2k-15^k+3$ be calculated with the formula of geometric series?Partial sum of general harmonic seriesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationlimit with sum and geometric progression
$begingroup$
I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$
I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as
$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$
(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)
When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:
$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$
On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:
$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$
But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.
Two questions:
- Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?
- How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?
calculus
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$
I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as
$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$
(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)
When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:
$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$
On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:
$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$
But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.
Two questions:
- Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?
- How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?
calculus
New contributor
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$
I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as
$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$
(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)
When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:
$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$
On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:
$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$
But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.
Two questions:
- Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?
- How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?
calculus
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$
I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as
$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$
(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)
When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:
$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$
On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:
$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$
But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.
Two questions:
- Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?
- How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?
calculus
calculus
New contributor
New contributor
edited 15 hours ago
Max
881318
881318
New contributor
asked 16 hours ago
JoonJoon
1185
1185
New contributor
New contributor
4
$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
16 hours ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
16 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
16 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
16 hours ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:
It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.
Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:
Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.
Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
Thus,
beginalign
sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
endalign
So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:
$$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$
Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
$$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
$$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$
Do that again
$$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
$$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$
Finally simplify
$$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$
As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the understandable explanation!
$endgroup$
– Joon
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151564%2fhow-is-the-partial-sum-of-a-geometric-sequence-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:
It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:
It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:
It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.
$endgroup$
Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:
It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.
edited 16 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
KKZiomekKKZiomek
2,2561640
2,2561640
$begingroup$
Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
$endgroup$
– KKZiomek
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
$endgroup$
– Joon
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.
$endgroup$
The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
J.G.J.G.
30.5k23149
30.5k23149
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.
Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:
Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.
Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
Thus,
beginalign
sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
endalign
So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.
Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:
Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.
Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
Thus,
beginalign
sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
endalign
So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.
Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:
Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.
Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
Thus,
beginalign
sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
endalign
So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.
Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:
Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.
Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
Thus,
beginalign
sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
&=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
endalign
So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.
New contributor
edited 12 hours ago
New contributor
answered 16 hours ago
Gkhan CebsGkhan Cebs
813
813
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:
$$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:
$$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:
$$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$
$endgroup$
Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:
$$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$
edited 5 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
BernardBernard
123k741116
123k741116
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$
Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
$$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
$$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$
Do that again
$$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
$$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$
Finally simplify
$$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$
As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the understandable explanation!
$endgroup$
– Joon
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$
Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
$$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
$$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$
Do that again
$$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
$$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$
Finally simplify
$$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$
As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the understandable explanation!
$endgroup$
– Joon
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$
Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
$$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
$$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$
Do that again
$$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
$$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$
Finally simplify
$$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$
As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$
$endgroup$
Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$
Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
$$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
$$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$
Do that again
$$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
$$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$
Finally simplify
$$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$
As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$
answered 12 hours ago
HenryHenry
101k482168
101k482168
$begingroup$
Thank you for the understandable explanation!
$endgroup$
– Joon
11 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for the understandable explanation!
$endgroup$
– Joon
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the understandable explanation!
$endgroup$
– Joon
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the understandable explanation!
$endgroup$
– Joon
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151564%2fhow-is-the-partial-sum-of-a-geometric-sequence-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
16 hours ago