Error: “inconsistent hash”. Workers crash and node is unable to connect to othersGeneric baking error on mainRegarding Baker-Node interactionHow do I remove the private mode setting from my node? My node is not connecting to peerError: Tezos_stdlib__Lwt_pipe.Closed for “ideal front node configuration”Node synchronizationRun Alphanet and Mainnet on the same VPSMake compilation errorWhat are the recommended requirements for running a nodeNode stops with 'Cannot open /dev/urandom' errorCannot import secret key ledger

Variable completely messes up echoed string

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

In what cases must I use 了 and in what cases not?

Help rendering a complicated sum/product formula

Print last inputted byte

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

Turning a hard to access nut?

I seem to dance, I am not a dancer. Who am I?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?

A Ri-diddley-iley Riddle

Fewest number of steps to reach 200 using special calculator

PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?

Do US professors/group leaders only get a salary, but no group budget?

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?

Maths symbols and unicode-math input inside siunitx commands

Loading the leaflet Map in Lightning Web Component

Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

What exactly term 'companion plants' means?

Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables

Can a medieval gyroplane be built?



Error: “inconsistent hash”. Workers crash and node is unable to connect to others


Generic baking error on mainRegarding Baker-Node interactionHow do I remove the private mode setting from my node? My node is not connecting to peerError: Tezos_stdlib__Lwt_pipe.Closed for “ideal front node configuration”Node synchronizationRun Alphanet and Mainnet on the same VPSMake compilation errorWhat are the recommended requirements for running a nodeNode stops with 'Cannot open /dev/urandom' errorCannot import secret key ledger













2















I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq









share|improve this question




























    2















    I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq









    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2


      1






      I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq









      share|improve this question
















      I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq






      node tezos-client error






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 13 hours ago







      MarcB

















      asked 14 hours ago









      MarcBMarcB

      14719




      14719




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            12 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "698"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f800%2ferror-inconsistent-hash-workers-crash-and-node-is-unable-to-connect-to-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            12 hours ago
















          3














          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            12 hours ago














          3












          3








          3







          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer













          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 14 hours ago









          MarcBMarcB

          14719




          14719







          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            12 hours ago













          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            12 hours ago








          1




          1





          Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

          – Ezy
          12 hours ago






          Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

          – Ezy
          12 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Tezos Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f800%2ferror-inconsistent-hash-workers-crash-and-node-is-unable-to-connect-to-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How does Billy Russo acquire his 'Jigsaw' mask? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why does Bane wear the mask?Why does Kylo Ren wear a mask?Why did Captain America remove his mask while fighting Batroc the Leaper?How did the OA acquire her wisdom?Is Billy Breckenridge gay?How does Adrian Toomes hide his earnings from the IRS?What is the state of affairs on Nootka Sound by the end of season 1?How did Tia Dalma acquire Captain Barbossa's body?How is one “Deemed Worthy”, to acquire the Greatsword “Dawn”?How did Karen acquire the handgun?

          Личност Атрибути на личността | Литература и източници | НавигацияРаждането на личносттаредактиратередактирате

          A sequel to Domino's tragic life Why Christmas is for Friends Cold comfort at Charles' padSad farewell for Lady JanePS Most watched News videos