How can Newt cast Accio on a Niffler when it is only supposed to work on inanimate objects? [duplicate]Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?How can they see Harry's invisibility cloak when they are not wearing it?How can electricity not work at Hogwarts?Can Harry Potter's Invisibility Cloak hide inanimate objects/Non-sentient beings?What would happen when you cast spells meant for objects on humans?If no spell can reawaken the dead, how did the resurrection stone work?How does the Accio spell work?If Magical Curses in Harry Potter only work on humans and other tangible objects, how did Voldemort curse the DADA position, if it was intangible?Can you transfigure animate objects into inanimate objects?Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?How quickly do objects summoned by Accio fly?
What is the difference between something being completely legal and being completely decriminalized?
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Is there any common country to visit for uk and schengen visa?
Recursively updating the MLE as new observations stream in
Single word to change groups
What will the Frenchman say?
How to balance a monster modification (zombie)?
How to test the sharpness of a knife?
Norwegian Refugee travel document
How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?
How do researchers send unsolicited emails asking for feedback on their works?
Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?
Print last inputted byte
pipe commands inside find -exec?
Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?
Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?
Would this string work as string?
Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to
"Marked down as someone wanting to sell shares." What does that mean?
Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?
TDE Master Key Rotation
Symbolism of 18 Journeyers
Is this Pascal's Matrix?
Emojional cryptic crossword
How can Newt cast Accio on a Niffler when it is only supposed to work on inanimate objects? [duplicate]
Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?How can they see Harry's invisibility cloak when they are not wearing it?How can electricity not work at Hogwarts?Can Harry Potter's Invisibility Cloak hide inanimate objects/Non-sentient beings?What would happen when you cast spells meant for objects on humans?If no spell can reawaken the dead, how did the resurrection stone work?How does the Accio spell work?If Magical Curses in Harry Potter only work on humans and other tangible objects, how did Voldemort curse the DADA position, if it was intangible?Can you transfigure animate objects into inanimate objects?Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?How quickly do objects summoned by Accio fly?
This question already has an answer here:
Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?
1 answer
Accio is not supposed to work on people or creatures as per this source:
Why couldn’t Newt use ‘Accio’ to retrieve all his beasts?
‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
JK Rowling’s New Website
Yet in the new film Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Newt casts 'Accio' on a Niffler to get it back to him. He specifically says 'Accio Niffler'.
Doesn’t this break the rules set by JK?
harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
marked as duplicate by Alex harry-potter
Users with the harry-potter badge can single-handedly close harry-potter questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
4 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
|
show 2 more comments
This question already has an answer here:
Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?
1 answer
Accio is not supposed to work on people or creatures as per this source:
Why couldn’t Newt use ‘Accio’ to retrieve all his beasts?
‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
JK Rowling’s New Website
Yet in the new film Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Newt casts 'Accio' on a Niffler to get it back to him. He specifically says 'Accio Niffler'.
Doesn’t this break the rules set by JK?
harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
marked as duplicate by Alex harry-potter
Users with the harry-potter badge can single-handedly close harry-potter questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
4 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
9
JKR breaks the rules set by JKR...
– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago
3
@TheLethalCarrot While this is true, it still a glaring mistake.
– GamerGypps
10 hours ago
5
Glaring mistakes and broken ret-cons seemed to be par for the course with JKR. So I believe the answer to your question is yes, it breaks her own rules.
– Virusbomb
10 hours ago
1
This seems like a duplicate of scifi.stackexchange.com/q/207433/100430 but I can’t close it since it has no answer.
– Alex
10 hours ago
Notably this is not her new (new) website but her old (new) website. It has since been superceded
– Valorum
10 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
This question already has an answer here:
Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?
1 answer
Accio is not supposed to work on people or creatures as per this source:
Why couldn’t Newt use ‘Accio’ to retrieve all his beasts?
‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
JK Rowling’s New Website
Yet in the new film Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Newt casts 'Accio' on a Niffler to get it back to him. He specifically says 'Accio Niffler'.
Doesn’t this break the rules set by JK?
harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
This question already has an answer here:
Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?
1 answer
Accio is not supposed to work on people or creatures as per this source:
Why couldn’t Newt use ‘Accio’ to retrieve all his beasts?
‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
JK Rowling’s New Website
Yet in the new film Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Newt casts 'Accio' on a Niffler to get it back to him. He specifically says 'Accio Niffler'.
Doesn’t this break the rules set by JK?
This question already has an answer here:
Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?
1 answer
harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald
harry-potter fantastic-beasts the-crimes-of-grindelwald
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
edited 6 hours ago
Bellatrix
76.9k15331385
76.9k15331385
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
asked 10 hours ago
GamerGyppsGamerGypps
2588
2588
marked as duplicate by Alex harry-potter
Users with the harry-potter badge can single-handedly close harry-potter questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
4 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Alex harry-potter
Users with the harry-potter badge can single-handedly close harry-potter questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
4 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
9
JKR breaks the rules set by JKR...
– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago
3
@TheLethalCarrot While this is true, it still a glaring mistake.
– GamerGypps
10 hours ago
5
Glaring mistakes and broken ret-cons seemed to be par for the course with JKR. So I believe the answer to your question is yes, it breaks her own rules.
– Virusbomb
10 hours ago
1
This seems like a duplicate of scifi.stackexchange.com/q/207433/100430 but I can’t close it since it has no answer.
– Alex
10 hours ago
Notably this is not her new (new) website but her old (new) website. It has since been superceded
– Valorum
10 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
9
JKR breaks the rules set by JKR...
– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago
3
@TheLethalCarrot While this is true, it still a glaring mistake.
– GamerGypps
10 hours ago
5
Glaring mistakes and broken ret-cons seemed to be par for the course with JKR. So I believe the answer to your question is yes, it breaks her own rules.
– Virusbomb
10 hours ago
1
This seems like a duplicate of scifi.stackexchange.com/q/207433/100430 but I can’t close it since it has no answer.
– Alex
10 hours ago
Notably this is not her new (new) website but her old (new) website. It has since been superceded
– Valorum
10 hours ago
9
9
JKR breaks the rules set by JKR...
– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago
JKR breaks the rules set by JKR...
– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago
3
3
@TheLethalCarrot While this is true, it still a glaring mistake.
– GamerGypps
10 hours ago
@TheLethalCarrot While this is true, it still a glaring mistake.
– GamerGypps
10 hours ago
5
5
Glaring mistakes and broken ret-cons seemed to be par for the course with JKR. So I believe the answer to your question is yes, it breaks her own rules.
– Virusbomb
10 hours ago
Glaring mistakes and broken ret-cons seemed to be par for the course with JKR. So I believe the answer to your question is yes, it breaks her own rules.
– Virusbomb
10 hours ago
1
1
This seems like a duplicate of scifi.stackexchange.com/q/207433/100430 but I can’t close it since it has no answer.
– Alex
10 hours ago
This seems like a duplicate of scifi.stackexchange.com/q/207433/100430 but I can’t close it since it has no answer.
– Alex
10 hours ago
Notably this is not her new (new) website but her old (new) website. It has since been superceded
– Valorum
10 hours ago
Notably this is not her new (new) website but her old (new) website. It has since been superceded
– Valorum
10 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Accio has been used on creatures before.
In the Harry Potter series, creatures have been successfully summoned by using Accio before, and aren’t harmed by it. Harry successfully Summoned Neville’s toad Trevor.
“I’m almost certain of it,’ said Hermione grimly. ‘Watch your frog, it’s escaping.’
Harry pointed his wand at the bullfrog that had been hopping hopefully towards the other side of the table – ‘Accio!’ – and it zoomed gloomily back into his hand.”
- Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 18 (Dumbledore’s Army)
Also, Ted Tonks successfully Summons salmon out of a river.
“There ought to be a few salmon in here, or d’you reckon it’s too early in the season? Accio salmon!’
There were several distinct splashes and then the slapping sounds of fish against flesh.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 15 (The Goblin’s Revenge)
Therefore, the answer by JKR contradicts the book.
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
1
It's worth mentioning that book canon is separate from movie canon, and both are separate from Rowling's "word of God". Questions and answers should be more specific about which canon they're talking about.
– only_pro
5 hours ago
Also don't forget about the fly that Harry accio'ed in Divination class while practicing the spell for the challenge. We still don't whether Harry managed to do it , or the fly was stupid to fly to his hand :)
– atayenel
5 hours ago
1
I guess creatures like frogs and fish are more likely to fail their spell saves.
– Sycorax
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I'd argue that though JKR said that objects travel close to the speed of light on that website, that all of her writings in the books seem to contradict this, as she seems to describe objects as appearing to fly through the air, rather than instantaneously teleporting, which is how traveling near the speed of light a very short distance would appear to a person. Additionally, there are examples in the books of people using accio on living things, such as Harry accio'ing the toad he was practicing the silencing charm in. As late as book 7, "accio salmon" is successfully used, however, as the intent was to eat the salmon, there was no concern about killing the salmon with sudden g-forces. https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Summoning_Charm Therefore, I see that blog post as the contradiction, rather than the accio'ing of the niffler.
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Accio has been used on creatures before.
In the Harry Potter series, creatures have been successfully summoned by using Accio before, and aren’t harmed by it. Harry successfully Summoned Neville’s toad Trevor.
“I’m almost certain of it,’ said Hermione grimly. ‘Watch your frog, it’s escaping.’
Harry pointed his wand at the bullfrog that had been hopping hopefully towards the other side of the table – ‘Accio!’ – and it zoomed gloomily back into his hand.”
- Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 18 (Dumbledore’s Army)
Also, Ted Tonks successfully Summons salmon out of a river.
“There ought to be a few salmon in here, or d’you reckon it’s too early in the season? Accio salmon!’
There were several distinct splashes and then the slapping sounds of fish against flesh.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 15 (The Goblin’s Revenge)
Therefore, the answer by JKR contradicts the book.
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
1
It's worth mentioning that book canon is separate from movie canon, and both are separate from Rowling's "word of God". Questions and answers should be more specific about which canon they're talking about.
– only_pro
5 hours ago
Also don't forget about the fly that Harry accio'ed in Divination class while practicing the spell for the challenge. We still don't whether Harry managed to do it , or the fly was stupid to fly to his hand :)
– atayenel
5 hours ago
1
I guess creatures like frogs and fish are more likely to fail their spell saves.
– Sycorax
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Accio has been used on creatures before.
In the Harry Potter series, creatures have been successfully summoned by using Accio before, and aren’t harmed by it. Harry successfully Summoned Neville’s toad Trevor.
“I’m almost certain of it,’ said Hermione grimly. ‘Watch your frog, it’s escaping.’
Harry pointed his wand at the bullfrog that had been hopping hopefully towards the other side of the table – ‘Accio!’ – and it zoomed gloomily back into his hand.”
- Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 18 (Dumbledore’s Army)
Also, Ted Tonks successfully Summons salmon out of a river.
“There ought to be a few salmon in here, or d’you reckon it’s too early in the season? Accio salmon!’
There were several distinct splashes and then the slapping sounds of fish against flesh.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 15 (The Goblin’s Revenge)
Therefore, the answer by JKR contradicts the book.
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
1
It's worth mentioning that book canon is separate from movie canon, and both are separate from Rowling's "word of God". Questions and answers should be more specific about which canon they're talking about.
– only_pro
5 hours ago
Also don't forget about the fly that Harry accio'ed in Divination class while practicing the spell for the challenge. We still don't whether Harry managed to do it , or the fly was stupid to fly to his hand :)
– atayenel
5 hours ago
1
I guess creatures like frogs and fish are more likely to fail their spell saves.
– Sycorax
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Accio has been used on creatures before.
In the Harry Potter series, creatures have been successfully summoned by using Accio before, and aren’t harmed by it. Harry successfully Summoned Neville’s toad Trevor.
“I’m almost certain of it,’ said Hermione grimly. ‘Watch your frog, it’s escaping.’
Harry pointed his wand at the bullfrog that had been hopping hopefully towards the other side of the table – ‘Accio!’ – and it zoomed gloomily back into his hand.”
- Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 18 (Dumbledore’s Army)
Also, Ted Tonks successfully Summons salmon out of a river.
“There ought to be a few salmon in here, or d’you reckon it’s too early in the season? Accio salmon!’
There were several distinct splashes and then the slapping sounds of fish against flesh.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 15 (The Goblin’s Revenge)
Therefore, the answer by JKR contradicts the book.
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
Accio has been used on creatures before.
In the Harry Potter series, creatures have been successfully summoned by using Accio before, and aren’t harmed by it. Harry successfully Summoned Neville’s toad Trevor.
“I’m almost certain of it,’ said Hermione grimly. ‘Watch your frog, it’s escaping.’
Harry pointed his wand at the bullfrog that had been hopping hopefully towards the other side of the table – ‘Accio!’ – and it zoomed gloomily back into his hand.”
- Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 18 (Dumbledore’s Army)
Also, Ted Tonks successfully Summons salmon out of a river.
“There ought to be a few salmon in here, or d’you reckon it’s too early in the season? Accio salmon!’
There were several distinct splashes and then the slapping sounds of fish against flesh.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 15 (The Goblin’s Revenge)
Therefore, the answer by JKR contradicts the book.
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
edited 4 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
answered 10 hours ago
BellatrixBellatrix
76.9k15331385
76.9k15331385
1
It's worth mentioning that book canon is separate from movie canon, and both are separate from Rowling's "word of God". Questions and answers should be more specific about which canon they're talking about.
– only_pro
5 hours ago
Also don't forget about the fly that Harry accio'ed in Divination class while practicing the spell for the challenge. We still don't whether Harry managed to do it , or the fly was stupid to fly to his hand :)
– atayenel
5 hours ago
1
I guess creatures like frogs and fish are more likely to fail their spell saves.
– Sycorax
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
It's worth mentioning that book canon is separate from movie canon, and both are separate from Rowling's "word of God". Questions and answers should be more specific about which canon they're talking about.
– only_pro
5 hours ago
Also don't forget about the fly that Harry accio'ed in Divination class while practicing the spell for the challenge. We still don't whether Harry managed to do it , or the fly was stupid to fly to his hand :)
– atayenel
5 hours ago
1
I guess creatures like frogs and fish are more likely to fail their spell saves.
– Sycorax
4 hours ago
1
1
It's worth mentioning that book canon is separate from movie canon, and both are separate from Rowling's "word of God". Questions and answers should be more specific about which canon they're talking about.
– only_pro
5 hours ago
It's worth mentioning that book canon is separate from movie canon, and both are separate from Rowling's "word of God". Questions and answers should be more specific about which canon they're talking about.
– only_pro
5 hours ago
Also don't forget about the fly that Harry accio'ed in Divination class while practicing the spell for the challenge. We still don't whether Harry managed to do it , or the fly was stupid to fly to his hand :)
– atayenel
5 hours ago
Also don't forget about the fly that Harry accio'ed in Divination class while practicing the spell for the challenge. We still don't whether Harry managed to do it , or the fly was stupid to fly to his hand :)
– atayenel
5 hours ago
1
1
I guess creatures like frogs and fish are more likely to fail their spell saves.
– Sycorax
4 hours ago
I guess creatures like frogs and fish are more likely to fail their spell saves.
– Sycorax
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I'd argue that though JKR said that objects travel close to the speed of light on that website, that all of her writings in the books seem to contradict this, as she seems to describe objects as appearing to fly through the air, rather than instantaneously teleporting, which is how traveling near the speed of light a very short distance would appear to a person. Additionally, there are examples in the books of people using accio on living things, such as Harry accio'ing the toad he was practicing the silencing charm in. As late as book 7, "accio salmon" is successfully used, however, as the intent was to eat the salmon, there was no concern about killing the salmon with sudden g-forces. https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Summoning_Charm Therefore, I see that blog post as the contradiction, rather than the accio'ing of the niffler.
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
add a comment |
I'd argue that though JKR said that objects travel close to the speed of light on that website, that all of her writings in the books seem to contradict this, as she seems to describe objects as appearing to fly through the air, rather than instantaneously teleporting, which is how traveling near the speed of light a very short distance would appear to a person. Additionally, there are examples in the books of people using accio on living things, such as Harry accio'ing the toad he was practicing the silencing charm in. As late as book 7, "accio salmon" is successfully used, however, as the intent was to eat the salmon, there was no concern about killing the salmon with sudden g-forces. https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Summoning_Charm Therefore, I see that blog post as the contradiction, rather than the accio'ing of the niffler.
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
add a comment |
I'd argue that though JKR said that objects travel close to the speed of light on that website, that all of her writings in the books seem to contradict this, as she seems to describe objects as appearing to fly through the air, rather than instantaneously teleporting, which is how traveling near the speed of light a very short distance would appear to a person. Additionally, there are examples in the books of people using accio on living things, such as Harry accio'ing the toad he was practicing the silencing charm in. As late as book 7, "accio salmon" is successfully used, however, as the intent was to eat the salmon, there was no concern about killing the salmon with sudden g-forces. https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Summoning_Charm Therefore, I see that blog post as the contradiction, rather than the accio'ing of the niffler.
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
I'd argue that though JKR said that objects travel close to the speed of light on that website, that all of her writings in the books seem to contradict this, as she seems to describe objects as appearing to fly through the air, rather than instantaneously teleporting, which is how traveling near the speed of light a very short distance would appear to a person. Additionally, there are examples in the books of people using accio on living things, such as Harry accio'ing the toad he was practicing the silencing charm in. As late as book 7, "accio salmon" is successfully used, however, as the intent was to eat the salmon, there was no concern about killing the salmon with sudden g-forces. https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Summoning_Charm Therefore, I see that blog post as the contradiction, rather than the accio'ing of the niffler.
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
answered 10 hours ago
KaiKai
5,0551928
5,0551928
add a comment |
add a comment |
9
JKR breaks the rules set by JKR...
– TheLethalCarrot
10 hours ago
3
@TheLethalCarrot While this is true, it still a glaring mistake.
– GamerGypps
10 hours ago
5
Glaring mistakes and broken ret-cons seemed to be par for the course with JKR. So I believe the answer to your question is yes, it breaks her own rules.
– Virusbomb
10 hours ago
1
This seems like a duplicate of scifi.stackexchange.com/q/207433/100430 but I can’t close it since it has no answer.
– Alex
10 hours ago
Notably this is not her new (new) website but her old (new) website. It has since been superceded
– Valorum
10 hours ago