Diophantine equation $3^a+1=3^b+5^c$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Transforming a Diophantine equation to an elliptic curveNon-negative integer solutions of a single Linear Diophantine EquationDiophantine problemDoes the following Diophantine equation have nontrivial rational solutions?Help with this Diophantine equationHelp with this system of Diophantine equationsThe Theory of Transfinite Diophantine EquationsFind a distinct postive integer solution to this $xyzw=504(x^2+y^2+z^2+w^2)$ diophantine equationExponential diophantine equation systemCombination of $k$-powers and divisibility
Diophantine equation $3^a+1=3^b+5^c$
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Transforming a Diophantine equation to an elliptic curveNon-negative integer solutions of a single Linear Diophantine EquationDiophantine problemDoes the following Diophantine equation have nontrivial rational solutions?Help with this Diophantine equationHelp with this system of Diophantine equationsThe Theory of Transfinite Diophantine EquationsFind a distinct postive integer solution to this $xyzw=504(x^2+y^2+z^2+w^2)$ diophantine equationExponential diophantine equation systemCombination of $k$-powers and divisibility
$begingroup$
This is not a research problem, but challenging enough that I've decided to post it in here:
Determine all triples $(a,b,c)$ of non-negative integers, satisfying
$$
1+3^a = 3^b+5^c.
$$
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations elementary-proofs
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not a research problem, but challenging enough that I've decided to post it in here:
Determine all triples $(a,b,c)$ of non-negative integers, satisfying
$$
1+3^a = 3^b+5^c.
$$
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations elementary-proofs
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Papers are still published on such questions (Lucia gave two examples, and there are others), so it's research-level (and thus fair game for Mathoverflow) even if it did not arise in your own research.
$endgroup$
– Noam D. Elkies
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
But if it's a puzzle to which OP already knows the answer, then I'd say it's not appropriate for MO.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday
$begingroup$
NoamD.Elkies: thanks for your comment. GerryMyerson: thanks. Had I known that these type of Diophantine equations are still an active area of research, would have likely phrased the problem that way. Still trying to digest the concept --- as there is a section (tag) with elementary proofs, that are contest problems, as opposed to research problems, but challenging enough that people still post.
$endgroup$
– kawa
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not a research problem, but challenging enough that I've decided to post it in here:
Determine all triples $(a,b,c)$ of non-negative integers, satisfying
$$
1+3^a = 3^b+5^c.
$$
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations elementary-proofs
$endgroup$
This is not a research problem, but challenging enough that I've decided to post it in here:
Determine all triples $(a,b,c)$ of non-negative integers, satisfying
$$
1+3^a = 3^b+5^c.
$$
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations elementary-proofs
nt.number-theory diophantine-equations elementary-proofs
edited yesterday
TheSimpliFire
12510
12510
asked 2 days ago
kawakawa
2137
2137
3
$begingroup$
Papers are still published on such questions (Lucia gave two examples, and there are others), so it's research-level (and thus fair game for Mathoverflow) even if it did not arise in your own research.
$endgroup$
– Noam D. Elkies
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
But if it's a puzzle to which OP already knows the answer, then I'd say it's not appropriate for MO.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday
$begingroup$
NoamD.Elkies: thanks for your comment. GerryMyerson: thanks. Had I known that these type of Diophantine equations are still an active area of research, would have likely phrased the problem that way. Still trying to digest the concept --- as there is a section (tag) with elementary proofs, that are contest problems, as opposed to research problems, but challenging enough that people still post.
$endgroup$
– kawa
yesterday
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Papers are still published on such questions (Lucia gave two examples, and there are others), so it's research-level (and thus fair game for Mathoverflow) even if it did not arise in your own research.
$endgroup$
– Noam D. Elkies
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
But if it's a puzzle to which OP already knows the answer, then I'd say it's not appropriate for MO.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday
$begingroup$
NoamD.Elkies: thanks for your comment. GerryMyerson: thanks. Had I known that these type of Diophantine equations are still an active area of research, would have likely phrased the problem that way. Still trying to digest the concept --- as there is a section (tag) with elementary proofs, that are contest problems, as opposed to research problems, but challenging enough that people still post.
$endgroup$
– kawa
yesterday
3
3
$begingroup$
Papers are still published on such questions (Lucia gave two examples, and there are others), so it's research-level (and thus fair game for Mathoverflow) even if it did not arise in your own research.
$endgroup$
– Noam D. Elkies
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Papers are still published on such questions (Lucia gave two examples, and there are others), so it's research-level (and thus fair game for Mathoverflow) even if it did not arise in your own research.
$endgroup$
– Noam D. Elkies
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
But if it's a puzzle to which OP already knows the answer, then I'd say it's not appropriate for MO.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday
$begingroup$
But if it's a puzzle to which OP already knows the answer, then I'd say it's not appropriate for MO.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday
$begingroup$
NoamD.Elkies: thanks for your comment. GerryMyerson: thanks. Had I known that these type of Diophantine equations are still an active area of research, would have likely phrased the problem that way. Still trying to digest the concept --- as there is a section (tag) with elementary proofs, that are contest problems, as opposed to research problems, but challenging enough that people still post.
$endgroup$
– kawa
yesterday
$begingroup$
NoamD.Elkies: thanks for your comment. GerryMyerson: thanks. Had I known that these type of Diophantine equations are still an active area of research, would have likely phrased the problem that way. Still trying to digest the concept --- as there is a section (tag) with elementary proofs, that are contest problems, as opposed to research problems, but challenging enough that people still post.
$endgroup$
– kawa
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I can't resist this: The young Chris Skinner showed that if $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$ are fixed positive integers, and $p$ and $q$ are positive coprime integers then the equation
$$
ap^x + bq^y = c+ dp^z q^w
$$
has a bounded number of solutions in $(x,y,z,w)$ and that a bound on these could be computed (and the equation solved in practice). This solves (in principle) the more general equation $1+3^a 5^d = 3^b+ 5^c$. Anyway, there is a large literature around such exponential diophantine equations, and Skinner's paper will give some references.
Following a reference from Skinner's paper, Theorem 4.01 of Brenner and Foster gives an explicit treatment of the equation
$$
3^a + 7^b=3^c+5^d,
$$
which completely resolves the problem in this question (take $b=0$). Their proof is elementary, and the only non-trivial solution to the equation in the question is $3^3+1 = 3 + 5^2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lucia, many thanks for the paper.
$endgroup$
– kawa
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328619%2fdiophantine-equation-3a1-3b5c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I can't resist this: The young Chris Skinner showed that if $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$ are fixed positive integers, and $p$ and $q$ are positive coprime integers then the equation
$$
ap^x + bq^y = c+ dp^z q^w
$$
has a bounded number of solutions in $(x,y,z,w)$ and that a bound on these could be computed (and the equation solved in practice). This solves (in principle) the more general equation $1+3^a 5^d = 3^b+ 5^c$. Anyway, there is a large literature around such exponential diophantine equations, and Skinner's paper will give some references.
Following a reference from Skinner's paper, Theorem 4.01 of Brenner and Foster gives an explicit treatment of the equation
$$
3^a + 7^b=3^c+5^d,
$$
which completely resolves the problem in this question (take $b=0$). Their proof is elementary, and the only non-trivial solution to the equation in the question is $3^3+1 = 3 + 5^2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lucia, many thanks for the paper.
$endgroup$
– kawa
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I can't resist this: The young Chris Skinner showed that if $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$ are fixed positive integers, and $p$ and $q$ are positive coprime integers then the equation
$$
ap^x + bq^y = c+ dp^z q^w
$$
has a bounded number of solutions in $(x,y,z,w)$ and that a bound on these could be computed (and the equation solved in practice). This solves (in principle) the more general equation $1+3^a 5^d = 3^b+ 5^c$. Anyway, there is a large literature around such exponential diophantine equations, and Skinner's paper will give some references.
Following a reference from Skinner's paper, Theorem 4.01 of Brenner and Foster gives an explicit treatment of the equation
$$
3^a + 7^b=3^c+5^d,
$$
which completely resolves the problem in this question (take $b=0$). Their proof is elementary, and the only non-trivial solution to the equation in the question is $3^3+1 = 3 + 5^2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lucia, many thanks for the paper.
$endgroup$
– kawa
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I can't resist this: The young Chris Skinner showed that if $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$ are fixed positive integers, and $p$ and $q$ are positive coprime integers then the equation
$$
ap^x + bq^y = c+ dp^z q^w
$$
has a bounded number of solutions in $(x,y,z,w)$ and that a bound on these could be computed (and the equation solved in practice). This solves (in principle) the more general equation $1+3^a 5^d = 3^b+ 5^c$. Anyway, there is a large literature around such exponential diophantine equations, and Skinner's paper will give some references.
Following a reference from Skinner's paper, Theorem 4.01 of Brenner and Foster gives an explicit treatment of the equation
$$
3^a + 7^b=3^c+5^d,
$$
which completely resolves the problem in this question (take $b=0$). Their proof is elementary, and the only non-trivial solution to the equation in the question is $3^3+1 = 3 + 5^2$.
$endgroup$
I can't resist this: The young Chris Skinner showed that if $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$ are fixed positive integers, and $p$ and $q$ are positive coprime integers then the equation
$$
ap^x + bq^y = c+ dp^z q^w
$$
has a bounded number of solutions in $(x,y,z,w)$ and that a bound on these could be computed (and the equation solved in practice). This solves (in principle) the more general equation $1+3^a 5^d = 3^b+ 5^c$. Anyway, there is a large literature around such exponential diophantine equations, and Skinner's paper will give some references.
Following a reference from Skinner's paper, Theorem 4.01 of Brenner and Foster gives an explicit treatment of the equation
$$
3^a + 7^b=3^c+5^d,
$$
which completely resolves the problem in this question (take $b=0$). Their proof is elementary, and the only non-trivial solution to the equation in the question is $3^3+1 = 3 + 5^2$.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
LuciaLucia
35.2k5151179
35.2k5151179
$begingroup$
Lucia, many thanks for the paper.
$endgroup$
– kawa
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lucia, many thanks for the paper.
$endgroup$
– kawa
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Lucia, many thanks for the paper.
$endgroup$
– kawa
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Lucia, many thanks for the paper.
$endgroup$
– kawa
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328619%2fdiophantine-equation-3a1-3b5c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Papers are still published on such questions (Lucia gave two examples, and there are others), so it's research-level (and thus fair game for Mathoverflow) even if it did not arise in your own research.
$endgroup$
– Noam D. Elkies
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
But if it's a puzzle to which OP already knows the answer, then I'd say it's not appropriate for MO.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
yesterday
$begingroup$
NoamD.Elkies: thanks for your comment. GerryMyerson: thanks. Had I known that these type of Diophantine equations are still an active area of research, would have likely phrased the problem that way. Still trying to digest the concept --- as there is a section (tag) with elementary proofs, that are contest problems, as opposed to research problems, but challenging enough that people still post.
$endgroup$
– kawa
yesterday