A question about the degree of an extension field Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)two Non isomorphic root field-extension of the field.determine degree of field extensionMinimal polynomial and field extensionDegree of the field extension.Field extension of degree 3 and polynomial rootsFinding the degree of the splitting fieldDegree of an extension fieldAn irreducible polynomial of degree n over field is irreducible over extension of degree m if m and n are coprimeA question about extension fieldA question about finite field extension of a finite field
Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?
How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?
Why is arima in R one time step off?
My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer
How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?
In search of the origins of term censor, I hit a dead end stuck with the greek term, to censor, λογοκρίνω
All ASCII characters with a given bit count
How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?
Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever
Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?
Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?
Was there ever a LEGO store in Miami International Airport?
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?
Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?
What do you call an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ)?
Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers
How to begin with a paragraph in latex
How was Lagrange appointed professor of mathematics so early?
Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table
A question about the degree of an extension field
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)two Non isomorphic root field-extension of the field.determine degree of field extensionMinimal polynomial and field extensionDegree of the field extension.Field extension of degree 3 and polynomial rootsFinding the degree of the splitting fieldDegree of an extension fieldAn irreducible polynomial of degree n over field is irreducible over extension of degree m if m and n are coprimeA question about extension fieldA question about finite field extension of a finite field
$begingroup$
Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?
I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.
abstract-algebra galois-theory finite-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?
I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.
abstract-algebra galois-theory finite-fields
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?
I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.
abstract-algebra galois-theory finite-fields
$endgroup$
Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?
I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.
abstract-algebra galois-theory finite-fields
abstract-algebra galois-theory finite-fields
asked 2 days ago
manifoldedmanifolded
53219
53219
$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago
$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago
$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
$endgroup$
– manifolded
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.
If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
$$
F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
$$
and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.
On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
$$
F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
$$
which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).
Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).
Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.
Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.
Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196381%2fa-question-about-the-degree-of-an-extension-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
$endgroup$
– manifolded
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
$endgroup$
– manifolded
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.
$endgroup$
In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.
Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
EhsaanEhsaan
1,075514
1,075514
$begingroup$
I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
$endgroup$
– manifolded
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
$endgroup$
– manifolded
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
$endgroup$
– manifolded
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
$endgroup$
– manifolded
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
$endgroup$
– Ehsaan
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.
If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
$$
F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
$$
and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.
On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
$$
F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
$$
which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).
Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).
Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.
Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.
Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.
If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
$$
F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
$$
and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.
On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
$$
F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
$$
which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).
Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).
Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.
Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.
Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.
If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
$$
F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
$$
and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.
On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
$$
F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
$$
which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).
Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).
Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.
Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.
Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.
$endgroup$
Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.
If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
$$
F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
$$
and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.
On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
$$
F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
$$
which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).
Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).
Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.
Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.
Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.
answered 2 days ago
egregegreg
186k1486209
186k1486209
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196381%2fa-question-about-the-degree-of-an-extension-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago