A question about the degree of an extension field Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)two Non isomorphic root field-extension of the field.determine degree of field extensionMinimal polynomial and field extensionDegree of the field extension.Field extension of degree 3 and polynomial rootsFinding the degree of the splitting fieldDegree of an extension fieldAn irreducible polynomial of degree n over field is irreducible over extension of degree m if m and n are coprimeA question about extension fieldA question about finite field extension of a finite field

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

Why is arima in R one time step off?

My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

In search of the origins of term censor, I hit a dead end stuck with the greek term, to censor, λογοκρίνω

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever

Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?

Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?

Was there ever a LEGO store in Miami International Airport?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?

Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?

What do you call an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ)?

Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers

How to begin with a paragraph in latex

How was Lagrange appointed professor of mathematics so early?

Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table



A question about the degree of an extension field



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)two Non isomorphic root field-extension of the field.determine degree of field extensionMinimal polynomial and field extensionDegree of the field extension.Field extension of degree 3 and polynomial rootsFinding the degree of the splitting fieldDegree of an extension fieldAn irreducible polynomial of degree n over field is irreducible over extension of degree m if m and n are coprimeA question about extension fieldA question about finite field extension of a finite field










1












$begingroup$


Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?



I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    2 days ago















1












$begingroup$


Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?



I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    2 days ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?



I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Consider $f(x) := x^3+2x+2$ and the field $mathbbZ_3$. $f(x)$ is obviously irreducible over $mathbbZ_3$. Let $a$ be a root in an extension field of $mathbbZ_3$, then why is it that $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? What is the basis of $mathbbZ_3(a)$ over $mathbbZ_3$?



I know that $mathbbZ_3(a) simeq mathbbZ_3[x]/<f(x)>$ and since $f(x)$ is irreducible in $mathbbZ_3$, any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree atmost 2. But I don't understand how that ties to $[mathbbZ_3(a):mathbbZ_3] = 3$? And how does that imply $mathbbZ_3(a)simeq GF(3^3)$? Thanks.







abstract-algebra galois-theory finite-fields






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









manifoldedmanifolded

53219




53219











  • $begingroup$
    See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago




$begingroup$
See "Field and Galois Theory, Patrick Morandi, chapter 1, proposition 1.15".
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    @manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    2 days ago


















1












$begingroup$

Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.



If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
$$
F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
$$

and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.



On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
$$
F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
$$

which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).



Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).



Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.



Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.



Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196381%2fa-question-about-the-degree-of-an-extension-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
      $endgroup$
      – manifolded
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      @manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago















    2












    $begingroup$

    In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
      $endgroup$
      – manifolded
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      @manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago













    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    In general, the degree of $F(alpha)$ over $F$ is the degree of the minimal polynomial of $alpha$. In this case, the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^3+2x+2$ which has degree $3$. The basis is $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Think of it this way: $F(alpha)$ should consist of elements of the form $p(alpha)/q(alpha)$, where $p,q$ are polynomials. But using the relation $alpha^3=-2alpha-2$, you can see that every polynomial in $alpha$ can be written as a linear combinations of $1,alpha,alpha^2$. And even $alpha^-1$ can be written as such. That means every element of $F(alpha)$ is a linear combination of $1,alpha,alpha^2$.



    Let $K=mathbbF_3(alpha)$. To see why $Ksimeq mathbbF_9$, it's just a cardinality argument: since $K$ is a $3$-dimensional $mathbbF_3$-vector space, we know from linear algebra that $Ksimeq mathbbF_3^3$ as vector spaces. The right hand side has 27 elements. So $K$ is the field of 27 elements.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    EhsaanEhsaan

    1,075514




    1,075514











    • $begingroup$
      I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
      $endgroup$
      – manifolded
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      @manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago
















    • $begingroup$
      I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
      $endgroup$
      – manifolded
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      @manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      2 days ago















    $begingroup$
    I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    I see, thanks. Why is $f(x)$ the minimal polynomial for $alpha$? Why can't we have a polynomial of degree, say 2, whose zero is $alpha$?
    $endgroup$
    – manifolded
    2 days ago












    $begingroup$
    Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    2 days ago





    $begingroup$
    Thanks @egreg, my arithmetic is suspect.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    2 days ago













    $begingroup$
    @manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    @manifolded: The minimal polynomial of $alpha$ has the property that it generates the ideal of all polynomials which vanish at $alpha$. It is the unique (monic) irreducible polynomial with $alpha$ as a root.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    2 days ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.



    If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
    $$
    F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
    $$

    and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.



    On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
    $$
    F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
    $$

    which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).



    Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).



    Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.



    Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.



    Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.



      If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
      $$
      F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
      $$

      and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.



      On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
      $$
      F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
      $$

      which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).



      Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).



      Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.



      Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.



      Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.



        If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
        $$
        F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
        $$

        and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.



        On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
        $$
        F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
        $$

        which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).



        Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).



        Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.



        Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.



        Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Look at the situation from a more abstract point of view. Let $F$ be a field and $f(x)in F[x]$ an irreducible monic polynomial.



        If $a$ is a root of $f(x)$ in some extension field $K$ of $F$, then, if $F(a)$ denotes the smallest subfield of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$, we have
        $$
        F(a)cong F[x]/langle f(x)rangle
        $$

        and moreover $F[a]$, the smallest subring of $K$ containing $F$ and $a$ is the same as $F(a)$. Therefore we can see $F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x]$.



        On the other hand, as $f(a)=0$, given $g(x)in F[x]$, we can perform the division and write $g(x)=f(x)q(x)+r(x)$, where $r$ has degree less than the degree of $f$. Thus we also have
        $$
        F(a)=F[a]=g(a):g(x)in F[x],deg g<deg f tag*
        $$

        which is probably what you refer to by saying “any polynomial in $mathbbZ_3[x]$ can have degree at most $2$” (which isn't a good way to express the fact).



        Now, suppose $g(x)$ is a monic polynomial satisfying $g(a)=0$. Take $g$ of minimal degree. Since we can perform the division $f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)$, the assumptions give us that $r(a)=0$; by minimality of $deg g$, we infer that $r(x)=0$. Therefore $g$ divides $f$. Since $f$ is irreducible, we deduce that $g(x)=f(x)$ (they can differ up to a nonzero multiplicative constant, but being both monic, the constant is $1$).



        Hence $f(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of $a$.



        Now we can see that the set $1,a,a^2,dots,a^n-1$ (where $n=deg f$) is a basis of $F[a]$ as a vector space over $F$. The fact it is a spanning set follows from (*); it is linearly independent because $f$ is the minimal polynomial and a linear combination of those elements is the value of a polynomial of lesser degree than $f$, so it cannot vanish unless all the coefficients are zero.



        Finally apply this to your particular case: $mathbbZ_3[a]$ is a three-dimensional vector space over $mathbbZ_3$, so it has $3^3=27$ elements.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        egregegreg

        186k1486209




        186k1486209



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196381%2fa-question-about-the-degree-of-an-extension-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How does Billy Russo acquire his 'Jigsaw' mask? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why does Bane wear the mask?Why does Kylo Ren wear a mask?Why did Captain America remove his mask while fighting Batroc the Leaper?How did the OA acquire her wisdom?Is Billy Breckenridge gay?How does Adrian Toomes hide his earnings from the IRS?What is the state of affairs on Nootka Sound by the end of season 1?How did Tia Dalma acquire Captain Barbossa's body?How is one “Deemed Worthy”, to acquire the Greatsword “Dawn”?How did Karen acquire the handgun?

            Личност Атрибути на личността | Литература и източници | НавигацияРаждането на личносттаредактиратередактирате

            A sequel to Domino's tragic life Why Christmas is for Friends Cold comfort at Charles' padSad farewell for Lady JanePS Most watched News videos