Biological Blimps: PropulsionPlausibility of Giant Floating WhalesA Bird that Never Touches GroundHigh-Altitude Life?How would lower gravity affect motion?Mermaid Buoyancy: Oily Livers, Swim Bladders and LungsPurpose of Engineered Organic Flying WhalesIs there a reason a flying species can't use lighter than air gas to help provide lift?Alternative flightWhat kind of wing design would a quadruped with six wings need to fly well?Would this biological cooling system work?Superheated wing blast!

How does electrical safety system work on ISS?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

What is Cash Advance APR?

15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Does the reader need to like the PoV character?

Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol

Is there a nicer/politer/more positive alternative for "negates"?

The IT department bottlenecks progress, how should I handle this?

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

What do you call a word that can be spelled forward or backward forming two different words

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?

How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?

Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

In a multiple cat home, how many litter boxes should you have?

"before" and "want" for the same systemd service?

Multiplicative persistence

Which Article Helped Get Rid of Technobabble in RPGs?

Does grappling negate Mirror Image?

US tourist/student visa



Biological Blimps: Propulsion


Plausibility of Giant Floating WhalesA Bird that Never Touches GroundHigh-Altitude Life?How would lower gravity affect motion?Mermaid Buoyancy: Oily Livers, Swim Bladders and LungsPurpose of Engineered Organic Flying WhalesIs there a reason a flying species can't use lighter than air gas to help provide lift?Alternative flightWhat kind of wing design would a quadruped with six wings need to fly well?Would this biological cooling system work?Superheated wing blast!













8












$begingroup$


A while back, I asked this question about the plausibility of giant floating whales and received an excellent and high-scoring answer from Dubukay demonstrating the unfeasibility of the idea. However, more recently I discovered some flawed assumption in the answer and wrote my own answer, demonstrating that, if we assumed a more reasonable gasbag skin thickness than Dubukay had, the idea became much more plausible. In my answer, I calculated that a creature with a mass of 500 kg (not counting the mass of the hydrogen) needed just over 400 kg for its gasbag. This leaves us with 100 kg for everything else.



Now, this flying gasbag will have to do more than just float around to survive. To find food, it will probably have to have some way to move around in the air. Blimps typically use propellers to do this, but propellers are unlikely to be viable for a biological creature for a variety of reasons. Aquatic creatures typically use some kind of flipper to move through the water, but because of the low density of air, the flippers would probably have to be impractically large. So the question is, what would be the best propulsion system for this type of flying creature?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    express.co.uk/news/science/686885/…
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    1 hour ago















8












$begingroup$


A while back, I asked this question about the plausibility of giant floating whales and received an excellent and high-scoring answer from Dubukay demonstrating the unfeasibility of the idea. However, more recently I discovered some flawed assumption in the answer and wrote my own answer, demonstrating that, if we assumed a more reasonable gasbag skin thickness than Dubukay had, the idea became much more plausible. In my answer, I calculated that a creature with a mass of 500 kg (not counting the mass of the hydrogen) needed just over 400 kg for its gasbag. This leaves us with 100 kg for everything else.



Now, this flying gasbag will have to do more than just float around to survive. To find food, it will probably have to have some way to move around in the air. Blimps typically use propellers to do this, but propellers are unlikely to be viable for a biological creature for a variety of reasons. Aquatic creatures typically use some kind of flipper to move through the water, but because of the low density of air, the flippers would probably have to be impractically large. So the question is, what would be the best propulsion system for this type of flying creature?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    express.co.uk/news/science/686885/…
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    1 hour ago













8












8








8





$begingroup$


A while back, I asked this question about the plausibility of giant floating whales and received an excellent and high-scoring answer from Dubukay demonstrating the unfeasibility of the idea. However, more recently I discovered some flawed assumption in the answer and wrote my own answer, demonstrating that, if we assumed a more reasonable gasbag skin thickness than Dubukay had, the idea became much more plausible. In my answer, I calculated that a creature with a mass of 500 kg (not counting the mass of the hydrogen) needed just over 400 kg for its gasbag. This leaves us with 100 kg for everything else.



Now, this flying gasbag will have to do more than just float around to survive. To find food, it will probably have to have some way to move around in the air. Blimps typically use propellers to do this, but propellers are unlikely to be viable for a biological creature for a variety of reasons. Aquatic creatures typically use some kind of flipper to move through the water, but because of the low density of air, the flippers would probably have to be impractically large. So the question is, what would be the best propulsion system for this type of flying creature?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




A while back, I asked this question about the plausibility of giant floating whales and received an excellent and high-scoring answer from Dubukay demonstrating the unfeasibility of the idea. However, more recently I discovered some flawed assumption in the answer and wrote my own answer, demonstrating that, if we assumed a more reasonable gasbag skin thickness than Dubukay had, the idea became much more plausible. In my answer, I calculated that a creature with a mass of 500 kg (not counting the mass of the hydrogen) needed just over 400 kg for its gasbag. This leaves us with 100 kg for everything else.



Now, this flying gasbag will have to do more than just float around to survive. To find food, it will probably have to have some way to move around in the air. Blimps typically use propellers to do this, but propellers are unlikely to be viable for a biological creature for a variety of reasons. Aquatic creatures typically use some kind of flipper to move through the water, but because of the low density of air, the flippers would probably have to be impractically large. So the question is, what would be the best propulsion system for this type of flying creature?







science-based biology creature-design flight






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









GryphonGryphon

4,27823269




4,27823269











  • $begingroup$
    express.co.uk/news/science/686885/…
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    express.co.uk/news/science/686885/…
    $endgroup$
    – jean
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
express.co.uk/news/science/686885/…
$endgroup$
– jean
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
express.co.uk/news/science/686885/…
$endgroup$
– jean
1 hour ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

One alternative method of propulsion that could be considered is: Basically having none at all...



Consider a symbiotic system where your 'bio-blimps' are more 'giant floating green houses' - Main creature feeds off light algae/lichen like secondary lifeform, which the main creature effectively cultivates as a means to gather energy from the sun by funneling rain water to them.



Further input could come from birds who nest in/on the bio-blimp, depositing the left overs from meals they collect from elsewhere, which in turns feeds the secondary bio-mass.



Bio-blimp's survival is no longer tied to it being able to navigate toward food, as its food source naturally grows or comes to it, and it is free to drift on the winds while adjusting its lifting bladders to maintain a comfortable altitude.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    The same way a nautilus swims around in water: jet propulsion. Nautiluses move using a hyponome, which expands to pull in water from the sides of the nautilus, and contracts to expel a jet of water.



    The bio-blimps can majestically wheeze across the land using what is essentially an organic bellows, just like the nautilus. Whenever it wants to move, it expands a bladder to pull in air from broad vents on the side of its body, and then compresses the bladder to expel the air through a much smaller vent to propel itself.



    Presumably they already have various valves and sphincters and what not for maintaining their main gasbag, so adding one smaller gasbag for locomotion should a breeze.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I had a similar idea, but seeing as air density is very low compared to that of water, you would need huge amounts of air expulsion pressure, so much so that I doubt a biological organism would be able to generate unlike one that lives in water.
      $endgroup$
      – Kaloyan
      4 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Kaloyan: Air density being much lower than water means that the air jet produces less thrust, but also the blimp has to overcome less drag. I'd assume any potential thrust/drag ratio is the same for air as it is for water, since in both cases the same fluids are producing the thrust and drag.
      $endgroup$
      – Giter
      4 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      AKA, flatulence... +1.
      $endgroup$
      – JBH
      52 mins ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    For obvious reasons, wings are by far the best propulsion system as far as animals go.



    Since that seems to not be possible due to that whale's anatomy however, and since we've already excluded flippers, I can think of two possible means of locomotion :



    • Jet propulsion : Such as the one squids use underwater by quickly ejecting water out of a valve, allowing them to reach great speeds. However due to the low density of air, jet propulsion would likely be very weak in terms of acceleration unless unrealistic amounts of pressure are applied. If you are thinking of a slower type of animal though that would be an idea.


    • No locomotion at all ! Some animals simply travel by drifting, such as jellyfish. Of course in the air that is not really an option, since food would probably be scarce thus depriving you of the luxury to drift aimlessly just waiting for food to land into your mouth.


    In conclusion, the best option then would be a combination of both proposals, that is aerial whales that mainly navigate the wind currents by letting themselves drift along the currents, with the ability to (slightly) steer using jet propulsion. That way no enormous amounts of jet pressure would be needed, thus staying in the realm of plausibility.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      Don't Fly, Fall with Style!



      Ok, so it's going to involve flying too, but...



      Your creature is going to have some way to control its buoyancy. Presumably muscles that change the shape slightly, thus changing the amount of air displaced, thus changing the buoyancy. So use this ability to your advantage.



      The creature grows small wings or flippers. Not nearly enough to lift the creature, but enough to generate some lift. Now the creature can control it's flight by trading height for speed.



      Your creature moves by:



      1. Expanding to increase buoyancy and increase altitude

      2. Contracting significantly, triggering a "fall"

      3. Using its "wings" to control the fall

      4. Expanding again before it hits the ground

      Effectively, your creature copies the locomotion of birds of prey, only instead of using thermals to gain height, it uses buoyancy. The lift from the wings will have both horizontal and vertical components, so some of the energy will be converted into making the dive longer, and some of it will go into moving your creature towards its objective.



      So your sky whales gracefully float while gaining altitude before suddenly diving in whatever direction they want to go.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        Hydrogen Rockets



        Consider that your gasbag is full of hydrogen. It would be entirely possible for it to take some of its excess hydrogen and allow it to escape in a direction of its choosing. It could then generate a spark and move because of the explosion (the valve would have to be stronger than the surrounding skin, or course).



        I don't think this is a practical solution, but it seems negligent to not mention it.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142043%2fbiological-blimps-propulsion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          One alternative method of propulsion that could be considered is: Basically having none at all...



          Consider a symbiotic system where your 'bio-blimps' are more 'giant floating green houses' - Main creature feeds off light algae/lichen like secondary lifeform, which the main creature effectively cultivates as a means to gather energy from the sun by funneling rain water to them.



          Further input could come from birds who nest in/on the bio-blimp, depositing the left overs from meals they collect from elsewhere, which in turns feeds the secondary bio-mass.



          Bio-blimp's survival is no longer tied to it being able to navigate toward food, as its food source naturally grows or comes to it, and it is free to drift on the winds while adjusting its lifting bladders to maintain a comfortable altitude.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$

















            4












            $begingroup$

            One alternative method of propulsion that could be considered is: Basically having none at all...



            Consider a symbiotic system where your 'bio-blimps' are more 'giant floating green houses' - Main creature feeds off light algae/lichen like secondary lifeform, which the main creature effectively cultivates as a means to gather energy from the sun by funneling rain water to them.



            Further input could come from birds who nest in/on the bio-blimp, depositing the left overs from meals they collect from elsewhere, which in turns feeds the secondary bio-mass.



            Bio-blimp's survival is no longer tied to it being able to navigate toward food, as its food source naturally grows or comes to it, and it is free to drift on the winds while adjusting its lifting bladders to maintain a comfortable altitude.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$















              4












              4








              4





              $begingroup$

              One alternative method of propulsion that could be considered is: Basically having none at all...



              Consider a symbiotic system where your 'bio-blimps' are more 'giant floating green houses' - Main creature feeds off light algae/lichen like secondary lifeform, which the main creature effectively cultivates as a means to gather energy from the sun by funneling rain water to them.



              Further input could come from birds who nest in/on the bio-blimp, depositing the left overs from meals they collect from elsewhere, which in turns feeds the secondary bio-mass.



              Bio-blimp's survival is no longer tied to it being able to navigate toward food, as its food source naturally grows or comes to it, and it is free to drift on the winds while adjusting its lifting bladders to maintain a comfortable altitude.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$



              One alternative method of propulsion that could be considered is: Basically having none at all...



              Consider a symbiotic system where your 'bio-blimps' are more 'giant floating green houses' - Main creature feeds off light algae/lichen like secondary lifeform, which the main creature effectively cultivates as a means to gather energy from the sun by funneling rain water to them.



              Further input could come from birds who nest in/on the bio-blimp, depositing the left overs from meals they collect from elsewhere, which in turns feeds the secondary bio-mass.



              Bio-blimp's survival is no longer tied to it being able to navigate toward food, as its food source naturally grows or comes to it, and it is free to drift on the winds while adjusting its lifting bladders to maintain a comfortable altitude.







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 4 hours ago









              TheLucklessTheLuckless

              1411




              1411




              New contributor




              TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              TheLuckless is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  The same way a nautilus swims around in water: jet propulsion. Nautiluses move using a hyponome, which expands to pull in water from the sides of the nautilus, and contracts to expel a jet of water.



                  The bio-blimps can majestically wheeze across the land using what is essentially an organic bellows, just like the nautilus. Whenever it wants to move, it expands a bladder to pull in air from broad vents on the side of its body, and then compresses the bladder to expel the air through a much smaller vent to propel itself.



                  Presumably they already have various valves and sphincters and what not for maintaining their main gasbag, so adding one smaller gasbag for locomotion should a breeze.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    I had a similar idea, but seeing as air density is very low compared to that of water, you would need huge amounts of air expulsion pressure, so much so that I doubt a biological organism would be able to generate unlike one that lives in water.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Kaloyan
                    4 hours ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    @Kaloyan: Air density being much lower than water means that the air jet produces less thrust, but also the blimp has to overcome less drag. I'd assume any potential thrust/drag ratio is the same for air as it is for water, since in both cases the same fluids are producing the thrust and drag.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Giter
                    4 hours ago











                  • $begingroup$
                    AKA, flatulence... +1.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JBH
                    52 mins ago















                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  The same way a nautilus swims around in water: jet propulsion. Nautiluses move using a hyponome, which expands to pull in water from the sides of the nautilus, and contracts to expel a jet of water.



                  The bio-blimps can majestically wheeze across the land using what is essentially an organic bellows, just like the nautilus. Whenever it wants to move, it expands a bladder to pull in air from broad vents on the side of its body, and then compresses the bladder to expel the air through a much smaller vent to propel itself.



                  Presumably they already have various valves and sphincters and what not for maintaining their main gasbag, so adding one smaller gasbag for locomotion should a breeze.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    I had a similar idea, but seeing as air density is very low compared to that of water, you would need huge amounts of air expulsion pressure, so much so that I doubt a biological organism would be able to generate unlike one that lives in water.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Kaloyan
                    4 hours ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    @Kaloyan: Air density being much lower than water means that the air jet produces less thrust, but also the blimp has to overcome less drag. I'd assume any potential thrust/drag ratio is the same for air as it is for water, since in both cases the same fluids are producing the thrust and drag.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Giter
                    4 hours ago











                  • $begingroup$
                    AKA, flatulence... +1.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JBH
                    52 mins ago













                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  The same way a nautilus swims around in water: jet propulsion. Nautiluses move using a hyponome, which expands to pull in water from the sides of the nautilus, and contracts to expel a jet of water.



                  The bio-blimps can majestically wheeze across the land using what is essentially an organic bellows, just like the nautilus. Whenever it wants to move, it expands a bladder to pull in air from broad vents on the side of its body, and then compresses the bladder to expel the air through a much smaller vent to propel itself.



                  Presumably they already have various valves and sphincters and what not for maintaining their main gasbag, so adding one smaller gasbag for locomotion should a breeze.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  The same way a nautilus swims around in water: jet propulsion. Nautiluses move using a hyponome, which expands to pull in water from the sides of the nautilus, and contracts to expel a jet of water.



                  The bio-blimps can majestically wheeze across the land using what is essentially an organic bellows, just like the nautilus. Whenever it wants to move, it expands a bladder to pull in air from broad vents on the side of its body, and then compresses the bladder to expel the air through a much smaller vent to propel itself.



                  Presumably they already have various valves and sphincters and what not for maintaining their main gasbag, so adding one smaller gasbag for locomotion should a breeze.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 hours ago

























                  answered 4 hours ago









                  GiterGiter

                  14.7k63543




                  14.7k63543











                  • $begingroup$
                    I had a similar idea, but seeing as air density is very low compared to that of water, you would need huge amounts of air expulsion pressure, so much so that I doubt a biological organism would be able to generate unlike one that lives in water.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Kaloyan
                    4 hours ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    @Kaloyan: Air density being much lower than water means that the air jet produces less thrust, but also the blimp has to overcome less drag. I'd assume any potential thrust/drag ratio is the same for air as it is for water, since in both cases the same fluids are producing the thrust and drag.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Giter
                    4 hours ago











                  • $begingroup$
                    AKA, flatulence... +1.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JBH
                    52 mins ago
















                  • $begingroup$
                    I had a similar idea, but seeing as air density is very low compared to that of water, you would need huge amounts of air expulsion pressure, so much so that I doubt a biological organism would be able to generate unlike one that lives in water.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Kaloyan
                    4 hours ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    @Kaloyan: Air density being much lower than water means that the air jet produces less thrust, but also the blimp has to overcome less drag. I'd assume any potential thrust/drag ratio is the same for air as it is for water, since in both cases the same fluids are producing the thrust and drag.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Giter
                    4 hours ago











                  • $begingroup$
                    AKA, flatulence... +1.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JBH
                    52 mins ago















                  $begingroup$
                  I had a similar idea, but seeing as air density is very low compared to that of water, you would need huge amounts of air expulsion pressure, so much so that I doubt a biological organism would be able to generate unlike one that lives in water.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Kaloyan
                  4 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  I had a similar idea, but seeing as air density is very low compared to that of water, you would need huge amounts of air expulsion pressure, so much so that I doubt a biological organism would be able to generate unlike one that lives in water.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Kaloyan
                  4 hours ago




                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  @Kaloyan: Air density being much lower than water means that the air jet produces less thrust, but also the blimp has to overcome less drag. I'd assume any potential thrust/drag ratio is the same for air as it is for water, since in both cases the same fluids are producing the thrust and drag.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Giter
                  4 hours ago





                  $begingroup$
                  @Kaloyan: Air density being much lower than water means that the air jet produces less thrust, but also the blimp has to overcome less drag. I'd assume any potential thrust/drag ratio is the same for air as it is for water, since in both cases the same fluids are producing the thrust and drag.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Giter
                  4 hours ago













                  $begingroup$
                  AKA, flatulence... +1.
                  $endgroup$
                  – JBH
                  52 mins ago




                  $begingroup$
                  AKA, flatulence... +1.
                  $endgroup$
                  – JBH
                  52 mins ago











                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  For obvious reasons, wings are by far the best propulsion system as far as animals go.



                  Since that seems to not be possible due to that whale's anatomy however, and since we've already excluded flippers, I can think of two possible means of locomotion :



                  • Jet propulsion : Such as the one squids use underwater by quickly ejecting water out of a valve, allowing them to reach great speeds. However due to the low density of air, jet propulsion would likely be very weak in terms of acceleration unless unrealistic amounts of pressure are applied. If you are thinking of a slower type of animal though that would be an idea.


                  • No locomotion at all ! Some animals simply travel by drifting, such as jellyfish. Of course in the air that is not really an option, since food would probably be scarce thus depriving you of the luxury to drift aimlessly just waiting for food to land into your mouth.


                  In conclusion, the best option then would be a combination of both proposals, that is aerial whales that mainly navigate the wind currents by letting themselves drift along the currents, with the ability to (slightly) steer using jet propulsion. That way no enormous amounts of jet pressure would be needed, thus staying in the realm of plausibility.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    For obvious reasons, wings are by far the best propulsion system as far as animals go.



                    Since that seems to not be possible due to that whale's anatomy however, and since we've already excluded flippers, I can think of two possible means of locomotion :



                    • Jet propulsion : Such as the one squids use underwater by quickly ejecting water out of a valve, allowing them to reach great speeds. However due to the low density of air, jet propulsion would likely be very weak in terms of acceleration unless unrealistic amounts of pressure are applied. If you are thinking of a slower type of animal though that would be an idea.


                    • No locomotion at all ! Some animals simply travel by drifting, such as jellyfish. Of course in the air that is not really an option, since food would probably be scarce thus depriving you of the luxury to drift aimlessly just waiting for food to land into your mouth.


                    In conclusion, the best option then would be a combination of both proposals, that is aerial whales that mainly navigate the wind currents by letting themselves drift along the currents, with the ability to (slightly) steer using jet propulsion. That way no enormous amounts of jet pressure would be needed, thus staying in the realm of plausibility.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      For obvious reasons, wings are by far the best propulsion system as far as animals go.



                      Since that seems to not be possible due to that whale's anatomy however, and since we've already excluded flippers, I can think of two possible means of locomotion :



                      • Jet propulsion : Such as the one squids use underwater by quickly ejecting water out of a valve, allowing them to reach great speeds. However due to the low density of air, jet propulsion would likely be very weak in terms of acceleration unless unrealistic amounts of pressure are applied. If you are thinking of a slower type of animal though that would be an idea.


                      • No locomotion at all ! Some animals simply travel by drifting, such as jellyfish. Of course in the air that is not really an option, since food would probably be scarce thus depriving you of the luxury to drift aimlessly just waiting for food to land into your mouth.


                      In conclusion, the best option then would be a combination of both proposals, that is aerial whales that mainly navigate the wind currents by letting themselves drift along the currents, with the ability to (slightly) steer using jet propulsion. That way no enormous amounts of jet pressure would be needed, thus staying in the realm of plausibility.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      For obvious reasons, wings are by far the best propulsion system as far as animals go.



                      Since that seems to not be possible due to that whale's anatomy however, and since we've already excluded flippers, I can think of two possible means of locomotion :



                      • Jet propulsion : Such as the one squids use underwater by quickly ejecting water out of a valve, allowing them to reach great speeds. However due to the low density of air, jet propulsion would likely be very weak in terms of acceleration unless unrealistic amounts of pressure are applied. If you are thinking of a slower type of animal though that would be an idea.


                      • No locomotion at all ! Some animals simply travel by drifting, such as jellyfish. Of course in the air that is not really an option, since food would probably be scarce thus depriving you of the luxury to drift aimlessly just waiting for food to land into your mouth.


                      In conclusion, the best option then would be a combination of both proposals, that is aerial whales that mainly navigate the wind currents by letting themselves drift along the currents, with the ability to (slightly) steer using jet propulsion. That way no enormous amounts of jet pressure would be needed, thus staying in the realm of plausibility.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 4 hours ago









                      KaloyanKaloyan

                      22413




                      22413





















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Don't Fly, Fall with Style!



                          Ok, so it's going to involve flying too, but...



                          Your creature is going to have some way to control its buoyancy. Presumably muscles that change the shape slightly, thus changing the amount of air displaced, thus changing the buoyancy. So use this ability to your advantage.



                          The creature grows small wings or flippers. Not nearly enough to lift the creature, but enough to generate some lift. Now the creature can control it's flight by trading height for speed.



                          Your creature moves by:



                          1. Expanding to increase buoyancy and increase altitude

                          2. Contracting significantly, triggering a "fall"

                          3. Using its "wings" to control the fall

                          4. Expanding again before it hits the ground

                          Effectively, your creature copies the locomotion of birds of prey, only instead of using thermals to gain height, it uses buoyancy. The lift from the wings will have both horizontal and vertical components, so some of the energy will be converted into making the dive longer, and some of it will go into moving your creature towards its objective.



                          So your sky whales gracefully float while gaining altitude before suddenly diving in whatever direction they want to go.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            Don't Fly, Fall with Style!



                            Ok, so it's going to involve flying too, but...



                            Your creature is going to have some way to control its buoyancy. Presumably muscles that change the shape slightly, thus changing the amount of air displaced, thus changing the buoyancy. So use this ability to your advantage.



                            The creature grows small wings or flippers. Not nearly enough to lift the creature, but enough to generate some lift. Now the creature can control it's flight by trading height for speed.



                            Your creature moves by:



                            1. Expanding to increase buoyancy and increase altitude

                            2. Contracting significantly, triggering a "fall"

                            3. Using its "wings" to control the fall

                            4. Expanding again before it hits the ground

                            Effectively, your creature copies the locomotion of birds of prey, only instead of using thermals to gain height, it uses buoyancy. The lift from the wings will have both horizontal and vertical components, so some of the energy will be converted into making the dive longer, and some of it will go into moving your creature towards its objective.



                            So your sky whales gracefully float while gaining altitude before suddenly diving in whatever direction they want to go.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              Don't Fly, Fall with Style!



                              Ok, so it's going to involve flying too, but...



                              Your creature is going to have some way to control its buoyancy. Presumably muscles that change the shape slightly, thus changing the amount of air displaced, thus changing the buoyancy. So use this ability to your advantage.



                              The creature grows small wings or flippers. Not nearly enough to lift the creature, but enough to generate some lift. Now the creature can control it's flight by trading height for speed.



                              Your creature moves by:



                              1. Expanding to increase buoyancy and increase altitude

                              2. Contracting significantly, triggering a "fall"

                              3. Using its "wings" to control the fall

                              4. Expanding again before it hits the ground

                              Effectively, your creature copies the locomotion of birds of prey, only instead of using thermals to gain height, it uses buoyancy. The lift from the wings will have both horizontal and vertical components, so some of the energy will be converted into making the dive longer, and some of it will go into moving your creature towards its objective.



                              So your sky whales gracefully float while gaining altitude before suddenly diving in whatever direction they want to go.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Don't Fly, Fall with Style!



                              Ok, so it's going to involve flying too, but...



                              Your creature is going to have some way to control its buoyancy. Presumably muscles that change the shape slightly, thus changing the amount of air displaced, thus changing the buoyancy. So use this ability to your advantage.



                              The creature grows small wings or flippers. Not nearly enough to lift the creature, but enough to generate some lift. Now the creature can control it's flight by trading height for speed.



                              Your creature moves by:



                              1. Expanding to increase buoyancy and increase altitude

                              2. Contracting significantly, triggering a "fall"

                              3. Using its "wings" to control the fall

                              4. Expanding again before it hits the ground

                              Effectively, your creature copies the locomotion of birds of prey, only instead of using thermals to gain height, it uses buoyancy. The lift from the wings will have both horizontal and vertical components, so some of the energy will be converted into making the dive longer, and some of it will go into moving your creature towards its objective.



                              So your sky whales gracefully float while gaining altitude before suddenly diving in whatever direction they want to go.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 1 hour ago









                              codeMonkeycodeMonkey

                              3,231819




                              3,231819





















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Hydrogen Rockets



                                  Consider that your gasbag is full of hydrogen. It would be entirely possible for it to take some of its excess hydrogen and allow it to escape in a direction of its choosing. It could then generate a spark and move because of the explosion (the valve would have to be stronger than the surrounding skin, or course).



                                  I don't think this is a practical solution, but it seems negligent to not mention it.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Hydrogen Rockets



                                    Consider that your gasbag is full of hydrogen. It would be entirely possible for it to take some of its excess hydrogen and allow it to escape in a direction of its choosing. It could then generate a spark and move because of the explosion (the valve would have to be stronger than the surrounding skin, or course).



                                    I don't think this is a practical solution, but it seems negligent to not mention it.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Hydrogen Rockets



                                      Consider that your gasbag is full of hydrogen. It would be entirely possible for it to take some of its excess hydrogen and allow it to escape in a direction of its choosing. It could then generate a spark and move because of the explosion (the valve would have to be stronger than the surrounding skin, or course).



                                      I don't think this is a practical solution, but it seems negligent to not mention it.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      Hydrogen Rockets



                                      Consider that your gasbag is full of hydrogen. It would be entirely possible for it to take some of its excess hydrogen and allow it to escape in a direction of its choosing. It could then generate a spark and move because of the explosion (the valve would have to be stronger than the surrounding skin, or course).



                                      I don't think this is a practical solution, but it seems negligent to not mention it.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 16 mins ago









                                      SpitemasterSpitemaster

                                      308129




                                      308129



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142043%2fbiological-blimps-propulsion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Благоевград Съдържание География | История | Население | Политика | Икономика и инфрастуктура | Здравеопазване | Образование и наука | Култура и забавления | Забележителности | Личности | Литература | Външни препратки | Бележки | Навигация42°01′18.99″ с. ш. 23°05′51″ и. д. / 42.021944° с. ш. 23.0975° и. д.*БлагоевградразширитередактиранеОфициален уебсайт на община БлагоевградНовинарски портал на Благоевград – blagoevgrad.euСайтове за БлагоевградНационален статистически институтdariknews.bgГригоровичъ, Викторъ. „Очеркъ путешествія по Европейской Турціи“. Москва, 1877.Стрезов, Георги. Два санджака от Източна Македония. Периодично списание на Българското книжовно дружество в Средец, кн. XXXVII и XXXVIII, 1891, стр. 18 – 19.Македония. Етнография и статистикаГаджанов, Димитър Г. Мюсюлманското население в Новоосвободените земи, в: Научна експедиция в Македония и Поморавието 1916, Военноиздателски комплекс „Св. Георги Победоносец“, Университетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“, София, 1993, стр. 244.паметник на незнайния четник&cd=18&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=firefox-a „История на днешен Благоевград“, взето от www.museumblg.com на 16 март 2010 г.„Справка за населението на град Благоевград, община Благоевград, област Благоевград, НСИ“„The population of all towns and villages in Blagoevgrad Province with 50 inhabitants or more according to census results and latest official estimates“„Ethnic composition, all places: 2011 census“История на Неврокопска епархия.Национален статистически институтМюсюлманско изповедание. Главно мюфтийствоНационален публичен регистър на храмовете в БългарияМюсюлманско изповедание. Главно мюфтийствоwww.dnes.bg Джамията в Благоевград не била паленаwww.sesc-bg.orgСписък на побратимени градовеТехническо побратимяванеГУМ грейва в цветовете на нощен Лас Вегас под името „Largo“, „МОЛ Благоевград“..., в. „Струма“grabo.bgwww.cinemaxbg.comррр4238731-067cad53a-0546-417b-a3d3-51e49b1d2232147736077147736077

                                          What is the best defense strategy for Survival in Grand Theft Auto Online?What is JP used for in Grand Theft Auto Online?How do I setup a Crew HQ in Grand Theft Auto Online?How does stealth work in Grand Theft Auto Online?Is it possible to own more than 10 cars in Grand Theft Auto online?Where to find truck/trailers in Grand Theft Auto OnlineWhat are some of the best missions to do on Grand Theft Auto 5 onlineFastest Car in Grand Theft Auto V PCHow to setup a Crew vs Crew online session in Grand Theft Auto Online?Grand theft auto 5 crossplayingRestart Grand Theft Auto V Online?

                                          How does Billy Russo acquire his 'Jigsaw' mask? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why does Bane wear the mask?Why does Kylo Ren wear a mask?Why did Captain America remove his mask while fighting Batroc the Leaper?How did the OA acquire her wisdom?Is Billy Breckenridge gay?How does Adrian Toomes hide his earnings from the IRS?What is the state of affairs on Nootka Sound by the end of season 1?How did Tia Dalma acquire Captain Barbossa's body?How is one “Deemed Worthy”, to acquire the Greatsword “Dawn”?How did Karen acquire the handgun?