How are Fiends, Celestials, dragons, etc. affected by the Antimagic Field spell?How to decide if an effect is magical for Magic Resistance?How could one defeat a pervasive antimagic field?Does an antimagic field also suppress the effects of supernatural abilities like change shape and invisibility (su)?Is a concentration spell suppressed when the caster is in Antimagic Field?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Does Antimagic Field suppress Vow of Poverty?Does an Antimagic Field spell block class features?What happens to area-effect spells like Darkness or Fog Cloud when an Antimagic Field moves?Under what circumstances does an antimagic field suppress the casting of a spell?Are all Eldritch Invocations nullified by an antimagic field?Are a monster's innate melee/ranged spell attack abilities blocked by a target's Antimagic Field?
It grows, but water kills it
Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability
Limits and Infinite Integration by Parts
Non-trope happy ending?
What happens if you are holding an Iron Flask with a demon inside and walk into an Antimagic Field?
Is there an injective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?
What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?
Does malloc reserve more space while allocating memory?
What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)
Invalid date error by date command
The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos' actions in Infinity War
What exact color does ozone gas have?
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?
Can a College of Swords bard use a Blade Flourish option on an opportunity attack provoked by their own Dissonant Whispers spell?
What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile
Can disgust be a key component of horror?
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
Quasinilpotent , non-compact operators
How to cover method return statement in Apex Class?
putting logo on same line but after title, latex
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?
How are Fiends, Celestials, dragons, etc. affected by the Antimagic Field spell?
How to decide if an effect is magical for Magic Resistance?How could one defeat a pervasive antimagic field?Does an antimagic field also suppress the effects of supernatural abilities like change shape and invisibility (su)?Is a concentration spell suppressed when the caster is in Antimagic Field?Will an Antimagic Field on a target of a “Haste” spell trigger the wave of lethargy?Does Antimagic Field suppress Vow of Poverty?Does an Antimagic Field spell block class features?What happens to area-effect spells like Darkness or Fog Cloud when an Antimagic Field moves?Under what circumstances does an antimagic field suppress the casting of a spell?Are all Eldritch Invocations nullified by an antimagic field?Are a monster's innate melee/ranged spell attack abilities blocked by a target's Antimagic Field?
$begingroup$
How are Fiends, Celestials, dragons, etc affected by the antimagic field spell?
I assume they can walk into them. Do they lose abilities, take damage, etc?
dnd-5e spells antimagic-field
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How are Fiends, Celestials, dragons, etc affected by the antimagic field spell?
I assume they can walk into them. Do they lose abilities, take damage, etc?
dnd-5e spells antimagic-field
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/99335/…
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Be sure to always put your question in the body of your post. The title should only ever be a summary of what the body says.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How are Fiends, Celestials, dragons, etc affected by the antimagic field spell?
I assume they can walk into them. Do they lose abilities, take damage, etc?
dnd-5e spells antimagic-field
New contributor
$endgroup$
How are Fiends, Celestials, dragons, etc affected by the antimagic field spell?
I assume they can walk into them. Do they lose abilities, take damage, etc?
dnd-5e spells antimagic-field
dnd-5e spells antimagic-field
New contributor
New contributor
edited 28 mins ago
V2Blast
25.4k486156
25.4k486156
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
VerdanVerdan
26114
26114
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/99335/…
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Be sure to always put your question in the body of your post. The title should only ever be a summary of what the body says.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/99335/…
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Be sure to always put your question in the body of your post. The title should only ever be a summary of what the body says.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/99335/…
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/99335/…
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Be sure to always put your question in the body of your post. The title should only ever be a summary of what the body says.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Be sure to always put your question in the body of your post. The title should only ever be a summary of what the body says.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Just the same as every other creature: they can't use magic or magical abilities
Antimagic field prevents the use of magic and magical abilities in a variety of ways within its area.
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it.
Nothing is special about any of these creatures that give it any special interaction with an anti-magic field. Dragons can still fly and breath fire in an AMF for example, but a spellcasting dragon would not be able to cast those spells inside the field. Any magical abilities the creatures have will be suppressed as well as any magical effects present on them.
None of the creature types are inherently magical in a way such that they would be affected separately from any magical abilities they have. There's no such thing as an inherently magical creature type, for example.
As always, we can use the test provided in the Sage Advice Compendium to tell what a magical feature is:
Determining whether a game feature is magical is straightforward. Ask yourself these questions about the feature:
- Is it a magic item?
- Is it a spell? Or does it let you create the effects of a spell
that’s mentioned in its description?
- Is it a spell attack?
- Is it fueled by the use of spell slots?
- Does its description say it’s magical?
If your answer to any of those questions is yes, the feature is magical.
If it doesn't fall into at least one of those categories, it is not affected.
So, the only an antimagic field has on a creature (the type does not matter) is the suppression of magical features, abilities, and effects on the creature. They take no damage or other effects.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Also, are the construct creature type not disabled RAW by AMF?
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel there are no rules or properties assigned to creature types in 5e. It is possible that a specific construct might be, but it will say so in its stat block if it has any magical form of animation. In general, they don't.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the answer would benefit from including mention of the distinction that Sage Advice draws between things which are game-mechanics magical and the "background magic" of the world, which lets things like dragons and demons and undead exist and cannot be dispelled or suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generally speaking, they just lose access to any magical effects on them and can't cast spells or use any other magical abilities, the same as every other creature in the game. From the antimagic field spell description:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
Fiends and celestials usually aren't native to any of the D&D worlds and are only native to their home planes. If a fiend or celestial (or fey, elemental etc.) are only present because of a summoning spell then they will vanish until the space they occupied is no longer inside of an antimagic field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do they lose abilities?
Nominally speaking, no, but it depends on what kinds of abilities we're talking about.
For example: A Dragon would not lose its ability to breathe fire. We recognize that Dragons are inherently magical, but their ability to breathe fire is the inherent magic of the universe itself, and not suppressed by an Antimagic Field.
Conversely, many Dragons/Fiends/Celestials have innate Spellcasting abilities. These abilities would be suppressed in an Antimagic Field, because that's specifically what Antimagic Field says it does (at least in the spell description):
[...]
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity, are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it. A slot expended to cast a suppressed spell is consumed. While an effect is suppressed, it doesn't function, but the time it spends suppressed counts against its duration.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
Do make sure to check that the entity in question isn't literally a diety/god (because they and their features are explicitly unaffected by an Antimagic Field) but otherwise, spellcasting would be suppressed.
Other features may or may not qualify depending on their nature. Things like the Devil's Sight feature common to Devils would not be suppressed, but a feature like the Magical Weapons feature that Erinyes (Monster Manual, pg. 73) have would be suppressed because the weapons are expressly described as being magical, and Antimagic Field is expressly described as turning Magical Weapons→Mundane.
Do they take damage?
Unless the creature's statblock specifically says that they take damage or are otherwise harmed in the presence of an Antimagic Field, they don't take damage. Some such creatures might be summoned by a spell, and in that case, they would temporarily disappear for the duration of the field:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Verdan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143751%2fhow-are-fiends-celestials-dragons-etc-affected-by-the-antimagic-field-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Just the same as every other creature: they can't use magic or magical abilities
Antimagic field prevents the use of magic and magical abilities in a variety of ways within its area.
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it.
Nothing is special about any of these creatures that give it any special interaction with an anti-magic field. Dragons can still fly and breath fire in an AMF for example, but a spellcasting dragon would not be able to cast those spells inside the field. Any magical abilities the creatures have will be suppressed as well as any magical effects present on them.
None of the creature types are inherently magical in a way such that they would be affected separately from any magical abilities they have. There's no such thing as an inherently magical creature type, for example.
As always, we can use the test provided in the Sage Advice Compendium to tell what a magical feature is:
Determining whether a game feature is magical is straightforward. Ask yourself these questions about the feature:
- Is it a magic item?
- Is it a spell? Or does it let you create the effects of a spell
that’s mentioned in its description?
- Is it a spell attack?
- Is it fueled by the use of spell slots?
- Does its description say it’s magical?
If your answer to any of those questions is yes, the feature is magical.
If it doesn't fall into at least one of those categories, it is not affected.
So, the only an antimagic field has on a creature (the type does not matter) is the suppression of magical features, abilities, and effects on the creature. They take no damage or other effects.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Also, are the construct creature type not disabled RAW by AMF?
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel there are no rules or properties assigned to creature types in 5e. It is possible that a specific construct might be, but it will say so in its stat block if it has any magical form of animation. In general, they don't.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the answer would benefit from including mention of the distinction that Sage Advice draws between things which are game-mechanics magical and the "background magic" of the world, which lets things like dragons and demons and undead exist and cannot be dispelled or suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just the same as every other creature: they can't use magic or magical abilities
Antimagic field prevents the use of magic and magical abilities in a variety of ways within its area.
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it.
Nothing is special about any of these creatures that give it any special interaction with an anti-magic field. Dragons can still fly and breath fire in an AMF for example, but a spellcasting dragon would not be able to cast those spells inside the field. Any magical abilities the creatures have will be suppressed as well as any magical effects present on them.
None of the creature types are inherently magical in a way such that they would be affected separately from any magical abilities they have. There's no such thing as an inherently magical creature type, for example.
As always, we can use the test provided in the Sage Advice Compendium to tell what a magical feature is:
Determining whether a game feature is magical is straightforward. Ask yourself these questions about the feature:
- Is it a magic item?
- Is it a spell? Or does it let you create the effects of a spell
that’s mentioned in its description?
- Is it a spell attack?
- Is it fueled by the use of spell slots?
- Does its description say it’s magical?
If your answer to any of those questions is yes, the feature is magical.
If it doesn't fall into at least one of those categories, it is not affected.
So, the only an antimagic field has on a creature (the type does not matter) is the suppression of magical features, abilities, and effects on the creature. They take no damage or other effects.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Also, are the construct creature type not disabled RAW by AMF?
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel there are no rules or properties assigned to creature types in 5e. It is possible that a specific construct might be, but it will say so in its stat block if it has any magical form of animation. In general, they don't.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the answer would benefit from including mention of the distinction that Sage Advice draws between things which are game-mechanics magical and the "background magic" of the world, which lets things like dragons and demons and undead exist and cannot be dispelled or suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just the same as every other creature: they can't use magic or magical abilities
Antimagic field prevents the use of magic and magical abilities in a variety of ways within its area.
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it.
Nothing is special about any of these creatures that give it any special interaction with an anti-magic field. Dragons can still fly and breath fire in an AMF for example, but a spellcasting dragon would not be able to cast those spells inside the field. Any magical abilities the creatures have will be suppressed as well as any magical effects present on them.
None of the creature types are inherently magical in a way such that they would be affected separately from any magical abilities they have. There's no such thing as an inherently magical creature type, for example.
As always, we can use the test provided in the Sage Advice Compendium to tell what a magical feature is:
Determining whether a game feature is magical is straightforward. Ask yourself these questions about the feature:
- Is it a magic item?
- Is it a spell? Or does it let you create the effects of a spell
that’s mentioned in its description?
- Is it a spell attack?
- Is it fueled by the use of spell slots?
- Does its description say it’s magical?
If your answer to any of those questions is yes, the feature is magical.
If it doesn't fall into at least one of those categories, it is not affected.
So, the only an antimagic field has on a creature (the type does not matter) is the suppression of magical features, abilities, and effects on the creature. They take no damage or other effects.
$endgroup$
Just the same as every other creature: they can't use magic or magical abilities
Antimagic field prevents the use of magic and magical abilities in a variety of ways within its area.
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it.
Nothing is special about any of these creatures that give it any special interaction with an anti-magic field. Dragons can still fly and breath fire in an AMF for example, but a spellcasting dragon would not be able to cast those spells inside the field. Any magical abilities the creatures have will be suppressed as well as any magical effects present on them.
None of the creature types are inherently magical in a way such that they would be affected separately from any magical abilities they have. There's no such thing as an inherently magical creature type, for example.
As always, we can use the test provided in the Sage Advice Compendium to tell what a magical feature is:
Determining whether a game feature is magical is straightforward. Ask yourself these questions about the feature:
- Is it a magic item?
- Is it a spell? Or does it let you create the effects of a spell
that’s mentioned in its description?
- Is it a spell attack?
- Is it fueled by the use of spell slots?
- Does its description say it’s magical?
If your answer to any of those questions is yes, the feature is magical.
If it doesn't fall into at least one of those categories, it is not affected.
So, the only an antimagic field has on a creature (the type does not matter) is the suppression of magical features, abilities, and effects on the creature. They take no damage or other effects.
edited 28 mins ago
V2Blast
25.4k486156
25.4k486156
answered 4 hours ago
RubiksmooseRubiksmoose
59.1k10285437
59.1k10285437
$begingroup$
Also, are the construct creature type not disabled RAW by AMF?
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel there are no rules or properties assigned to creature types in 5e. It is possible that a specific construct might be, but it will say so in its stat block if it has any magical form of animation. In general, they don't.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the answer would benefit from including mention of the distinction that Sage Advice draws between things which are game-mechanics magical and the "background magic" of the world, which lets things like dragons and demons and undead exist and cannot be dispelled or suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Also, are the construct creature type not disabled RAW by AMF?
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel there are no rules or properties assigned to creature types in 5e. It is possible that a specific construct might be, but it will say so in its stat block if it has any magical form of animation. In general, they don't.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the answer would benefit from including mention of the distinction that Sage Advice draws between things which are game-mechanics magical and the "background magic" of the world, which lets things like dragons and demons and undead exist and cannot be dispelled or suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
38 mins ago
$begingroup$
Also, are the construct creature type not disabled RAW by AMF?
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also, are the construct creature type not disabled RAW by AMF?
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel there are no rules or properties assigned to creature types in 5e. It is possible that a specific construct might be, but it will say so in its stat block if it has any magical form of animation. In general, they don't.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel there are no rules or properties assigned to creature types in 5e. It is possible that a specific construct might be, but it will say so in its stat block if it has any magical form of animation. In general, they don't.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the answer would benefit from including mention of the distinction that Sage Advice draws between things which are game-mechanics magical and the "background magic" of the world, which lets things like dragons and demons and undead exist and cannot be dispelled or suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
38 mins ago
$begingroup$
I think the answer would benefit from including mention of the distinction that Sage Advice draws between things which are game-mechanics magical and the "background magic" of the world, which lets things like dragons and demons and undead exist and cannot be dispelled or suppressed.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generally speaking, they just lose access to any magical effects on them and can't cast spells or use any other magical abilities, the same as every other creature in the game. From the antimagic field spell description:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
Fiends and celestials usually aren't native to any of the D&D worlds and are only native to their home planes. If a fiend or celestial (or fey, elemental etc.) are only present because of a summoning spell then they will vanish until the space they occupied is no longer inside of an antimagic field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generally speaking, they just lose access to any magical effects on them and can't cast spells or use any other magical abilities, the same as every other creature in the game. From the antimagic field spell description:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
Fiends and celestials usually aren't native to any of the D&D worlds and are only native to their home planes. If a fiend or celestial (or fey, elemental etc.) are only present because of a summoning spell then they will vanish until the space they occupied is no longer inside of an antimagic field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generally speaking, they just lose access to any magical effects on them and can't cast spells or use any other magical abilities, the same as every other creature in the game. From the antimagic field spell description:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
Fiends and celestials usually aren't native to any of the D&D worlds and are only native to their home planes. If a fiend or celestial (or fey, elemental etc.) are only present because of a summoning spell then they will vanish until the space they occupied is no longer inside of an antimagic field.
$endgroup$
Generally speaking, they just lose access to any magical effects on them and can't cast spells or use any other magical abilities, the same as every other creature in the game. From the antimagic field spell description:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
Fiends and celestials usually aren't native to any of the D&D worlds and are only native to their home planes. If a fiend or celestial (or fey, elemental etc.) are only present because of a summoning spell then they will vanish until the space they occupied is no longer inside of an antimagic field.
edited 28 mins ago
V2Blast
25.4k486156
25.4k486156
answered 4 hours ago
Allan MillsAllan Mills
1,20615
1,20615
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do they lose abilities?
Nominally speaking, no, but it depends on what kinds of abilities we're talking about.
For example: A Dragon would not lose its ability to breathe fire. We recognize that Dragons are inherently magical, but their ability to breathe fire is the inherent magic of the universe itself, and not suppressed by an Antimagic Field.
Conversely, many Dragons/Fiends/Celestials have innate Spellcasting abilities. These abilities would be suppressed in an Antimagic Field, because that's specifically what Antimagic Field says it does (at least in the spell description):
[...]
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity, are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it. A slot expended to cast a suppressed spell is consumed. While an effect is suppressed, it doesn't function, but the time it spends suppressed counts against its duration.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
Do make sure to check that the entity in question isn't literally a diety/god (because they and their features are explicitly unaffected by an Antimagic Field) but otherwise, spellcasting would be suppressed.
Other features may or may not qualify depending on their nature. Things like the Devil's Sight feature common to Devils would not be suppressed, but a feature like the Magical Weapons feature that Erinyes (Monster Manual, pg. 73) have would be suppressed because the weapons are expressly described as being magical, and Antimagic Field is expressly described as turning Magical Weapons→Mundane.
Do they take damage?
Unless the creature's statblock specifically says that they take damage or are otherwise harmed in the presence of an Antimagic Field, they don't take damage. Some such creatures might be summoned by a spell, and in that case, they would temporarily disappear for the duration of the field:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do they lose abilities?
Nominally speaking, no, but it depends on what kinds of abilities we're talking about.
For example: A Dragon would not lose its ability to breathe fire. We recognize that Dragons are inherently magical, but their ability to breathe fire is the inherent magic of the universe itself, and not suppressed by an Antimagic Field.
Conversely, many Dragons/Fiends/Celestials have innate Spellcasting abilities. These abilities would be suppressed in an Antimagic Field, because that's specifically what Antimagic Field says it does (at least in the spell description):
[...]
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity, are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it. A slot expended to cast a suppressed spell is consumed. While an effect is suppressed, it doesn't function, but the time it spends suppressed counts against its duration.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
Do make sure to check that the entity in question isn't literally a diety/god (because they and their features are explicitly unaffected by an Antimagic Field) but otherwise, spellcasting would be suppressed.
Other features may or may not qualify depending on their nature. Things like the Devil's Sight feature common to Devils would not be suppressed, but a feature like the Magical Weapons feature that Erinyes (Monster Manual, pg. 73) have would be suppressed because the weapons are expressly described as being magical, and Antimagic Field is expressly described as turning Magical Weapons→Mundane.
Do they take damage?
Unless the creature's statblock specifically says that they take damage or are otherwise harmed in the presence of an Antimagic Field, they don't take damage. Some such creatures might be summoned by a spell, and in that case, they would temporarily disappear for the duration of the field:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do they lose abilities?
Nominally speaking, no, but it depends on what kinds of abilities we're talking about.
For example: A Dragon would not lose its ability to breathe fire. We recognize that Dragons are inherently magical, but their ability to breathe fire is the inherent magic of the universe itself, and not suppressed by an Antimagic Field.
Conversely, many Dragons/Fiends/Celestials have innate Spellcasting abilities. These abilities would be suppressed in an Antimagic Field, because that's specifically what Antimagic Field says it does (at least in the spell description):
[...]
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity, are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it. A slot expended to cast a suppressed spell is consumed. While an effect is suppressed, it doesn't function, but the time it spends suppressed counts against its duration.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
Do make sure to check that the entity in question isn't literally a diety/god (because they and their features are explicitly unaffected by an Antimagic Field) but otherwise, spellcasting would be suppressed.
Other features may or may not qualify depending on their nature. Things like the Devil's Sight feature common to Devils would not be suppressed, but a feature like the Magical Weapons feature that Erinyes (Monster Manual, pg. 73) have would be suppressed because the weapons are expressly described as being magical, and Antimagic Field is expressly described as turning Magical Weapons→Mundane.
Do they take damage?
Unless the creature's statblock specifically says that they take damage or are otherwise harmed in the presence of an Antimagic Field, they don't take damage. Some such creatures might be summoned by a spell, and in that case, they would temporarily disappear for the duration of the field:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
$endgroup$
Do they lose abilities?
Nominally speaking, no, but it depends on what kinds of abilities we're talking about.
For example: A Dragon would not lose its ability to breathe fire. We recognize that Dragons are inherently magical, but their ability to breathe fire is the inherent magic of the universe itself, and not suppressed by an Antimagic Field.
Conversely, many Dragons/Fiends/Celestials have innate Spellcasting abilities. These abilities would be suppressed in an Antimagic Field, because that's specifically what Antimagic Field says it does (at least in the spell description):
[...]
Spells and other magical effects, except those created by an artifact or a deity, are suppressed in the sphere and can't protrude into it. A slot expended to cast a suppressed spell is consumed. While an effect is suppressed, it doesn't function, but the time it spends suppressed counts against its duration.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
Do make sure to check that the entity in question isn't literally a diety/god (because they and their features are explicitly unaffected by an Antimagic Field) but otherwise, spellcasting would be suppressed.
Other features may or may not qualify depending on their nature. Things like the Devil's Sight feature common to Devils would not be suppressed, but a feature like the Magical Weapons feature that Erinyes (Monster Manual, pg. 73) have would be suppressed because the weapons are expressly described as being magical, and Antimagic Field is expressly described as turning Magical Weapons→Mundane.
Do they take damage?
Unless the creature's statblock specifically says that they take damage or are otherwise harmed in the presence of an Antimagic Field, they don't take damage. Some such creatures might be summoned by a spell, and in that case, they would temporarily disappear for the duration of the field:
Creatures and Objects. A creature or object summoned or created by magic temporarily winks out of existence in the sphere. Such a creature instantly reappears once the space the creature occupied is no longer within the sphere.
—Antimagic Field, PHB, pg. 213
answered 4 hours ago
XiremaXirema
21.7k263128
21.7k263128
add a comment |
add a comment |
Verdan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Verdan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Verdan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Verdan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143751%2fhow-are-fiends-celestials-dragons-etc-affected-by-the-antimagic-field-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Related: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/99335/…
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Be sure to always put your question in the body of your post. The title should only ever be a summary of what the body says.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
4 hours ago