How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?How do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?Does Java support default parameter values?How do I convert a String to an int in Java?Creating a memory leak with JavaHow should I have explained the difference between an Interface and an Abstract class?Why is “final” not allowed in Java 8 interface methods?
Can the van der Waals coefficients be negative in the van der Waals equation for real gases?
Lights are flickering on and off after accidentally bumping into light switch
What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?
Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
Why do some non-religious people reject artificial consciousness?
Does using the Inspiration rules for character defects encourage My Guy Syndrome?
How can I introduce the names of fantasy creatures to the reader?
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
How to mute a string and play another at the same time
Why is one lightbulb in a string illuminated?
A journey... into the MIND
Determine the generator of an ideal of ring of integers
Is my guitar’s action too high?
Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data
What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?
Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?
tabularx column has extra padding at right?
Who can become a wight?
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
Unix AIX passing variable and arguments to expect and spawn
Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?How do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?Does Java support default parameter values?How do I convert a String to an int in Java?Creating a memory leak with JavaHow should I have explained the difference between an Interface and an Abstract class?Why is “final” not allowed in Java 8 interface methods?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
default
methods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface
helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default
methods helped to support lambdas?
java
add a comment |
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
default
methods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface
helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default
methods helped to support lambdas?
java
add a comment |
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
default
methods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface
helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default
methods helped to support lambdas?
java
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
default
methods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface
helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default
methods helped to support lambdas?
java
java
edited yesterday
Boann
37.6k1291123
37.6k1291123
asked yesterday
mCsmCs
6211832
6211832
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach
method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer
functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection
interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection
interface would have to implement the forEach
method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer
, Supplier
, Predicate
, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf()
, stream()
, etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R>
interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t)
, so when you need a Function
somewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function
instance where that lambda method is the apply
method.
However once you have a Function
instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after)
that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function
interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
16 hours ago
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
7 hours ago
add a comment |
While this is a great question and there are already insightful answers but you should be very careful with adding default
method to any existing interfaces.
And, I take this from Effective Java - Item 21: Design interfaces with posterity the following words :
But it is not always possible to write a default method that maintains all invariants of every conceivable implementation.
Although adding a default method to an existing interface facilitate backwards compatibility but the primary goal of adding this was to allow clients to ease use new interface without having to write their own implementation.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55780860%2fhow-do-java-8-default-methods-h%25d0%25b5lp-with-lambdas%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach
method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer
functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection
interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection
interface would have to implement the forEach
method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer
, Supplier
, Predicate
, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
add a comment |
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach
method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer
functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection
interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection
interface would have to implement the forEach
method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer
, Supplier
, Predicate
, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
add a comment |
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach
method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer
functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection
interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection
interface would have to implement the forEach
method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer
, Supplier
, Predicate
, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach
method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer
functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection
interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection
interface would have to implement the forEach
method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer
, Supplier
, Predicate
, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
edited yesterday
Oleksandr
9,64044372
9,64044372
answered yesterday
Amardeep BhowmickAmardeep Bhowmick
6,39121231
6,39121231
add a comment |
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf()
, stream()
, etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf()
, stream()
, etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf()
, stream()
, etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf()
, stream()
, etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
answered yesterday
JB NizetJB Nizet
550k618981025
550k618981025
add a comment |
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R>
interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t)
, so when you need a Function
somewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function
instance where that lambda method is the apply
method.
However once you have a Function
instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after)
that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function
interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
16 hours ago
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R>
interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t)
, so when you need a Function
somewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function
instance where that lambda method is the apply
method.
However once you have a Function
instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after)
that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function
interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
16 hours ago
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R>
interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t)
, so when you need a Function
somewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function
instance where that lambda method is the apply
method.
However once you have a Function
instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after)
that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function
interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R>
interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t)
, so when you need a Function
somewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function
instance where that lambda method is the apply
method.
However once you have a Function
instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after)
that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function
interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
answered yesterday
kajacxkajacx
7,59642754
7,59642754
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
16 hours ago
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
7 hours ago
add a comment |
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
16 hours ago
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
7 hours ago
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
16 hours ago
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
16 hours ago
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
7 hours ago
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
7 hours ago
add a comment |
While this is a great question and there are already insightful answers but you should be very careful with adding default
method to any existing interfaces.
And, I take this from Effective Java - Item 21: Design interfaces with posterity the following words :
But it is not always possible to write a default method that maintains all invariants of every conceivable implementation.
Although adding a default method to an existing interface facilitate backwards compatibility but the primary goal of adding this was to allow clients to ease use new interface without having to write their own implementation.
add a comment |
While this is a great question and there are already insightful answers but you should be very careful with adding default
method to any existing interfaces.
And, I take this from Effective Java - Item 21: Design interfaces with posterity the following words :
But it is not always possible to write a default method that maintains all invariants of every conceivable implementation.
Although adding a default method to an existing interface facilitate backwards compatibility but the primary goal of adding this was to allow clients to ease use new interface without having to write their own implementation.
add a comment |
While this is a great question and there are already insightful answers but you should be very careful with adding default
method to any existing interfaces.
And, I take this from Effective Java - Item 21: Design interfaces with posterity the following words :
But it is not always possible to write a default method that maintains all invariants of every conceivable implementation.
Although adding a default method to an existing interface facilitate backwards compatibility but the primary goal of adding this was to allow clients to ease use new interface without having to write their own implementation.
While this is a great question and there are already insightful answers but you should be very careful with adding default
method to any existing interfaces.
And, I take this from Effective Java - Item 21: Design interfaces with posterity the following words :
But it is not always possible to write a default method that maintains all invariants of every conceivable implementation.
Although adding a default method to an existing interface facilitate backwards compatibility but the primary goal of adding this was to allow clients to ease use new interface without having to write their own implementation.
answered yesterday
Prabin PaudelPrabin Paudel
1,39041528
1,39041528
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55780860%2fhow-do-java-8-default-methods-h%25d0%25b5lp-with-lambdas%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown