Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?Does HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge
Which big number is bigger?
Classification of surfaces
Get consecutive integer number ranges from list of int
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
What's the name of these pliers?
How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned
What is the philosophical significance of speech acts/implicature?
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
How can I practically buy stocks?
Should the Death Curse affect an undead PC in the Tomb of Annihilation adventure?
How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish
Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?
How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?
How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?
How did Captain America manage to do this?
Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?
Does HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
add a comment |
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
2 days ago
add a comment |
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
unit-test mock
edited Apr 23 at 19:42
WEFX
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
1699
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
2 days ago
add a comment |
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
2 days ago
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
2 days ago
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
add a comment |
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
add a comment |
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true
or always false
, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
111k19122260
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
2 days ago