Two monoidal structures and copoweringDefinition of enriched caterories or internal homs without using monoidal categories.Unitalization internal to monoidal categoriesCorrespondence between operads and monads requires tensor distribute over coproduct?Making additive envelopes of monoidal categories monoidalEnriching categories and equivalencesSeeking more information regarding the “rigoidal category” of $mathbbN$-graded setsIs there a monoidal category that coclassifies enriched category structures for a given set?Biased vs unbiased lax monoidal categoriesDefinitions of enriched monoidal categoryEnrichment of lax monoidal functors between closed monoidal categories

Two monoidal structures and copowering


Definition of enriched caterories or internal homs without using monoidal categories.Unitalization internal to monoidal categoriesCorrespondence between operads and monads requires tensor distribute over coproduct?Making additive envelopes of monoidal categories monoidalEnriching categories and equivalencesSeeking more information regarding the “rigoidal category” of $mathbbN$-graded setsIs there a monoidal category that coclassifies enriched category structures for a given set?Biased vs unbiased lax monoidal categoriesDefinitions of enriched monoidal categoryEnrichment of lax monoidal functors between closed monoidal categories













6












$begingroup$


Let $(mathbfM,otimes,1)$ be a closed monoidal category and $(mathbfC,oplus,0)$ an $mathbfM$-enriched monoidal category. Furthermore, assume that we have a copowering $odot:mathbfMtimesmathbfCto mathbfC$. Is there a canonical morphism
$$(Aodot X)oplus (Bodot Y)to (Aotimes B)odot (Xoplus Y)$$
The question came to my mind because in order to spell out the axioms (in one of the definitions) for an algebra over an operad $mathcalO$ in the above setting, we need for the associativity axiom a morphism
$$mathcalO(r)odot left(bigoplus_i (mathcalO(k_i)odot X^oplus k_i)right)toleft(mathcalO(r)otimesbigotimes_imathcalO(k_i)right)odot left(bigoplus_iX^oplus k_iright)$$
Or the other direction. If $mathbfM$ is considered to be enriched over itself, everything is fine because then $otimes=odot=oplus$, but in general?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, it seems to be equivalent to the formulation: “The copowering is a monoidal functor with respect to the component-wise monoidal structure.”
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago















6












$begingroup$


Let $(mathbfM,otimes,1)$ be a closed monoidal category and $(mathbfC,oplus,0)$ an $mathbfM$-enriched monoidal category. Furthermore, assume that we have a copowering $odot:mathbfMtimesmathbfCto mathbfC$. Is there a canonical morphism
$$(Aodot X)oplus (Bodot Y)to (Aotimes B)odot (Xoplus Y)$$
The question came to my mind because in order to spell out the axioms (in one of the definitions) for an algebra over an operad $mathcalO$ in the above setting, we need for the associativity axiom a morphism
$$mathcalO(r)odot left(bigoplus_i (mathcalO(k_i)odot X^oplus k_i)right)toleft(mathcalO(r)otimesbigotimes_imathcalO(k_i)right)odot left(bigoplus_iX^oplus k_iright)$$
Or the other direction. If $mathbfM$ is considered to be enriched over itself, everything is fine because then $otimes=odot=oplus$, but in general?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, it seems to be equivalent to the formulation: “The copowering is a monoidal functor with respect to the component-wise monoidal structure.”
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


Let $(mathbfM,otimes,1)$ be a closed monoidal category and $(mathbfC,oplus,0)$ an $mathbfM$-enriched monoidal category. Furthermore, assume that we have a copowering $odot:mathbfMtimesmathbfCto mathbfC$. Is there a canonical morphism
$$(Aodot X)oplus (Bodot Y)to (Aotimes B)odot (Xoplus Y)$$
The question came to my mind because in order to spell out the axioms (in one of the definitions) for an algebra over an operad $mathcalO$ in the above setting, we need for the associativity axiom a morphism
$$mathcalO(r)odot left(bigoplus_i (mathcalO(k_i)odot X^oplus k_i)right)toleft(mathcalO(r)otimesbigotimes_imathcalO(k_i)right)odot left(bigoplus_iX^oplus k_iright)$$
Or the other direction. If $mathbfM$ is considered to be enriched over itself, everything is fine because then $otimes=odot=oplus$, but in general?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $(mathbfM,otimes,1)$ be a closed monoidal category and $(mathbfC,oplus,0)$ an $mathbfM$-enriched monoidal category. Furthermore, assume that we have a copowering $odot:mathbfMtimesmathbfCto mathbfC$. Is there a canonical morphism
$$(Aodot X)oplus (Bodot Y)to (Aotimes B)odot (Xoplus Y)$$
The question came to my mind because in order to spell out the axioms (in one of the definitions) for an algebra over an operad $mathcalO$ in the above setting, we need for the associativity axiom a morphism
$$mathcalO(r)odot left(bigoplus_i (mathcalO(k_i)odot X^oplus k_i)right)toleft(mathcalO(r)otimesbigotimes_imathcalO(k_i)right)odot left(bigoplus_iX^oplus k_iright)$$
Or the other direction. If $mathbfM$ is considered to be enriched over itself, everything is fine because then $otimes=odot=oplus$, but in general?







ct.category-theory monoidal-categories operads enriched-category-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









FKranholdFKranhold

3046




3046







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, it seems to be equivalent to the formulation: “The copowering is a monoidal functor with respect to the component-wise monoidal structure.”
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, it seems to be equivalent to the formulation: “The copowering is a monoidal functor with respect to the component-wise monoidal structure.”
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Okay, it seems to be equivalent to the formulation: “The copowering is a monoidal functor with respect to the component-wise monoidal structure.”
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Okay, it seems to be equivalent to the formulation: “The copowering is a monoidal functor with respect to the component-wise monoidal structure.”
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

No. Consider the case where $(M,otimes,1)$ is $(mathbfSet,times,1)$, so the enrichment is vacuous, and $(C,oplus,0)$ is $(mathbfSet,+,0)$, with copowering $odot$ given by $times$.



Then the morphism you ask for would give a map
$$(A times X) + (B times Y) longrightarrow (A times B) times (X + Y) $$



which doesn’t exist in general: consider $A = X = Y = 1$, $B = 0$.




However, there is a natural map in the other direction. There are natural maps $A to C(X,A odot X)$ and $B to C(Y,B odot Y)$, the structure maps of the copowering. Also, the definition of enriched monoidal category includes the condition that $oplus$ is an enriched bifunctor, so there’s a general map $C(X,X') otimes C(Y,Y') to C(X oplus Y, X' oplus Y')$. Putting these together, we get a map
$$ A otimes B longrightarrow C(X, A odot X) otimes C(Y, B odot Y) longrightarrow C(X oplus Y, (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)) $$
which corresponds under copowering to a map $(A otimes B) odot (X oplus Y) to (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Good counterexample! Then maybe there is a canonical morphism in the other direction? Otherwise, I have the above problem with the associativity axiom for algebras over operads, as long as we do not assume that the copowering is a monoidal functor …
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @FKranhold: Yes, there is a natural map in the converse direction — I’ll add the description of that in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    28 mins ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326520%2ftwo-monoidal-structures-and-copowering%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

No. Consider the case where $(M,otimes,1)$ is $(mathbfSet,times,1)$, so the enrichment is vacuous, and $(C,oplus,0)$ is $(mathbfSet,+,0)$, with copowering $odot$ given by $times$.



Then the morphism you ask for would give a map
$$(A times X) + (B times Y) longrightarrow (A times B) times (X + Y) $$



which doesn’t exist in general: consider $A = X = Y = 1$, $B = 0$.




However, there is a natural map in the other direction. There are natural maps $A to C(X,A odot X)$ and $B to C(Y,B odot Y)$, the structure maps of the copowering. Also, the definition of enriched monoidal category includes the condition that $oplus$ is an enriched bifunctor, so there’s a general map $C(X,X') otimes C(Y,Y') to C(X oplus Y, X' oplus Y')$. Putting these together, we get a map
$$ A otimes B longrightarrow C(X, A odot X) otimes C(Y, B odot Y) longrightarrow C(X oplus Y, (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)) $$
which corresponds under copowering to a map $(A otimes B) odot (X oplus Y) to (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Good counterexample! Then maybe there is a canonical morphism in the other direction? Otherwise, I have the above problem with the associativity axiom for algebras over operads, as long as we do not assume that the copowering is a monoidal functor …
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @FKranhold: Yes, there is a natural map in the converse direction — I’ll add the description of that in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    28 mins ago















6












$begingroup$

No. Consider the case where $(M,otimes,1)$ is $(mathbfSet,times,1)$, so the enrichment is vacuous, and $(C,oplus,0)$ is $(mathbfSet,+,0)$, with copowering $odot$ given by $times$.



Then the morphism you ask for would give a map
$$(A times X) + (B times Y) longrightarrow (A times B) times (X + Y) $$



which doesn’t exist in general: consider $A = X = Y = 1$, $B = 0$.




However, there is a natural map in the other direction. There are natural maps $A to C(X,A odot X)$ and $B to C(Y,B odot Y)$, the structure maps of the copowering. Also, the definition of enriched monoidal category includes the condition that $oplus$ is an enriched bifunctor, so there’s a general map $C(X,X') otimes C(Y,Y') to C(X oplus Y, X' oplus Y')$. Putting these together, we get a map
$$ A otimes B longrightarrow C(X, A odot X) otimes C(Y, B odot Y) longrightarrow C(X oplus Y, (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)) $$
which corresponds under copowering to a map $(A otimes B) odot (X oplus Y) to (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Good counterexample! Then maybe there is a canonical morphism in the other direction? Otherwise, I have the above problem with the associativity axiom for algebras over operads, as long as we do not assume that the copowering is a monoidal functor …
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @FKranhold: Yes, there is a natural map in the converse direction — I’ll add the description of that in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    28 mins ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$

No. Consider the case where $(M,otimes,1)$ is $(mathbfSet,times,1)$, so the enrichment is vacuous, and $(C,oplus,0)$ is $(mathbfSet,+,0)$, with copowering $odot$ given by $times$.



Then the morphism you ask for would give a map
$$(A times X) + (B times Y) longrightarrow (A times B) times (X + Y) $$



which doesn’t exist in general: consider $A = X = Y = 1$, $B = 0$.




However, there is a natural map in the other direction. There are natural maps $A to C(X,A odot X)$ and $B to C(Y,B odot Y)$, the structure maps of the copowering. Also, the definition of enriched monoidal category includes the condition that $oplus$ is an enriched bifunctor, so there’s a general map $C(X,X') otimes C(Y,Y') to C(X oplus Y, X' oplus Y')$. Putting these together, we get a map
$$ A otimes B longrightarrow C(X, A odot X) otimes C(Y, B odot Y) longrightarrow C(X oplus Y, (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)) $$
which corresponds under copowering to a map $(A otimes B) odot (X oplus Y) to (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



No. Consider the case where $(M,otimes,1)$ is $(mathbfSet,times,1)$, so the enrichment is vacuous, and $(C,oplus,0)$ is $(mathbfSet,+,0)$, with copowering $odot$ given by $times$.



Then the morphism you ask for would give a map
$$(A times X) + (B times Y) longrightarrow (A times B) times (X + Y) $$



which doesn’t exist in general: consider $A = X = Y = 1$, $B = 0$.




However, there is a natural map in the other direction. There are natural maps $A to C(X,A odot X)$ and $B to C(Y,B odot Y)$, the structure maps of the copowering. Also, the definition of enriched monoidal category includes the condition that $oplus$ is an enriched bifunctor, so there’s a general map $C(X,X') otimes C(Y,Y') to C(X oplus Y, X' oplus Y')$. Putting these together, we get a map
$$ A otimes B longrightarrow C(X, A odot X) otimes C(Y, B odot Y) longrightarrow C(X oplus Y, (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)) $$
which corresponds under copowering to a map $(A otimes B) odot (X oplus Y) to (A odot X) oplus (B odot Y)$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 23 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Peter LeFanu LumsdainePeter LeFanu Lumsdaine

8,81613871




8,81613871











  • $begingroup$
    Good counterexample! Then maybe there is a canonical morphism in the other direction? Otherwise, I have the above problem with the associativity axiom for algebras over operads, as long as we do not assume that the copowering is a monoidal functor …
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @FKranhold: Yes, there is a natural map in the converse direction — I’ll add the description of that in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    28 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Good counterexample! Then maybe there is a canonical morphism in the other direction? Otherwise, I have the above problem with the associativity axiom for algebras over operads, as long as we do not assume that the copowering is a monoidal functor …
    $endgroup$
    – FKranhold
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @FKranhold: Yes, there is a natural map in the converse direction — I’ll add the description of that in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
    28 mins ago















$begingroup$
Good counterexample! Then maybe there is a canonical morphism in the other direction? Otherwise, I have the above problem with the associativity axiom for algebras over operads, as long as we do not assume that the copowering is a monoidal functor …
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Good counterexample! Then maybe there is a canonical morphism in the other direction? Otherwise, I have the above problem with the associativity axiom for algebras over operads, as long as we do not assume that the copowering is a monoidal functor …
$endgroup$
– FKranhold
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@FKranhold: Yes, there is a natural map in the converse direction — I’ll add the description of that in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
28 mins ago




$begingroup$
@FKranhold: Yes, there is a natural map in the converse direction — I’ll add the description of that in my answer.
$endgroup$
– Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
28 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326520%2ftwo-monoidal-structures-and-copowering%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Благоевград Съдържание География | История | Население | Политика | Икономика и инфрастуктура | Здравеопазване | Образование и наука | Култура и забавления | Забележителности | Личности | Литература | Външни препратки | Бележки | Навигация42°01′18.99″ с. ш. 23°05′51″ и. д. / 42.021944° с. ш. 23.0975° и. д.*БлагоевградразширитередактиранеОфициален уебсайт на община БлагоевградНовинарски портал на Благоевград – blagoevgrad.euСайтове за БлагоевградНационален статистически институтdariknews.bgГригоровичъ, Викторъ. „Очеркъ путешествія по Европейской Турціи“. Москва, 1877.Стрезов, Георги. Два санджака от Източна Македония. Периодично списание на Българското книжовно дружество в Средец, кн. XXXVII и XXXVIII, 1891, стр. 18 – 19.Македония. Етнография и статистикаГаджанов, Димитър Г. Мюсюлманското население в Новоосвободените земи, в: Научна експедиция в Македония и Поморавието 1916, Военноиздателски комплекс „Св. Георги Победоносец“, Университетско издателство „Св. Климент Охридски“, София, 1993, стр. 244.паметник на незнайния четник&cd=18&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=firefox-a „История на днешен Благоевград“, взето от www.museumblg.com на 16 март 2010 г.„Справка за населението на град Благоевград, община Благоевград, област Благоевград, НСИ“„The population of all towns and villages in Blagoevgrad Province with 50 inhabitants or more according to census results and latest official estimates“„Ethnic composition, all places: 2011 census“История на Неврокопска епархия.Национален статистически институтМюсюлманско изповедание. Главно мюфтийствоНационален публичен регистър на храмовете в БългарияМюсюлманско изповедание. Главно мюфтийствоwww.dnes.bg Джамията в Благоевград не била паленаwww.sesc-bg.orgСписък на побратимени градовеТехническо побратимяванеГУМ грейва в цветовете на нощен Лас Вегас под името „Largo“, „МОЛ Благоевград“..., в. „Струма“grabo.bgwww.cinemaxbg.comррр4238731-067cad53a-0546-417b-a3d3-51e49b1d2232147736077147736077

What is the best defense strategy for Survival in Grand Theft Auto Online?What is JP used for in Grand Theft Auto Online?How do I setup a Crew HQ in Grand Theft Auto Online?How does stealth work in Grand Theft Auto Online?Is it possible to own more than 10 cars in Grand Theft Auto online?Where to find truck/trailers in Grand Theft Auto OnlineWhat are some of the best missions to do on Grand Theft Auto 5 onlineFastest Car in Grand Theft Auto V PCHow to setup a Crew vs Crew online session in Grand Theft Auto Online?Grand theft auto 5 crossplayingRestart Grand Theft Auto V Online?

How does Billy Russo acquire his 'Jigsaw' mask? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why does Bane wear the mask?Why does Kylo Ren wear a mask?Why did Captain America remove his mask while fighting Batroc the Leaper?How did the OA acquire her wisdom?Is Billy Breckenridge gay?How does Adrian Toomes hide his earnings from the IRS?What is the state of affairs on Nootka Sound by the end of season 1?How did Tia Dalma acquire Captain Barbossa's body?How is one “Deemed Worthy”, to acquire the Greatsword “Dawn”?How did Karen acquire the handgun?