Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the parameters of a planet having multiple moons?Timekeeping Systems on a Habitable MoonI'm building a fantasy world like Earth but it has two moons adjacent to each other in a co-orbital configuration and need helpVolcanic winter related to moons?Moon orbit perpendicular to planet orbit - possible?Could 2 eclipses be visible simultaneously in the same area?How can I lengthen a total solar eclipse on an earth-like planet?Solar Eclipses on Planet Tidally Locked with Its MoonHow to create an annual celestial event for a worldHow to calculate hour angle of a moon?
Are there any limitations on attacking while grappling?
If a black hole is created from light, can this black hole then move at speed of light?
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords
Giving the same color to different shapefiles in QGIS
In excess I'm lethal
Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
How does the mv command work with external drives?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?
Elegant way to replace substring in a regex with optional groups in Python?
A "random" question: usage of "random" as adjective in Spanish
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin
Workaholic Formal/Informal
Disadvantage of gaining multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
"and that skill is always a class skill for you" - does "always" have any meaning in Pathfinder?
Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?
SOQL: Aggregate, Grouping By and WHERE Clauses not working
How to prepend a string to only the lines of text which are numbers
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the parameters of a planet having multiple moons?Timekeeping Systems on a Habitable MoonI'm building a fantasy world like Earth but it has two moons adjacent to each other in a co-orbital configuration and need helpVolcanic winter related to moons?Moon orbit perpendicular to planet orbit - possible?Could 2 eclipses be visible simultaneously in the same area?How can I lengthen a total solar eclipse on an earth-like planet?Solar Eclipses on Planet Tidally Locked with Its MoonHow to create an annual celestial event for a worldHow to calculate hour angle of a moon?
$begingroup$
Given a system similar to the Earth/Moon/Sun system, how would one go about making solar eclipses rarer than they are here on earth, but keep new moons similar to how they currently are (or at least similar)?
At first I thought that increasing the lunar tilt from 5 degrees to, say, 10 degrees would help, but there would still always be two "nodes" indicating where solar eclipses could happen on the planet. Even at a 90 degree angle, twice a year, the planet would see solar eclipses. at 10 degrees, new moons would still be relatively as frequent, though at 90 degrees, I don't think there would ever be a new moon.
Is there a way to make total solar eclipses happen infrequently, while keeping new moons frequent? And if so, what variable(s) need to change to make that happen?
science-based orbital-mechanics solar-system eclipses
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a system similar to the Earth/Moon/Sun system, how would one go about making solar eclipses rarer than they are here on earth, but keep new moons similar to how they currently are (or at least similar)?
At first I thought that increasing the lunar tilt from 5 degrees to, say, 10 degrees would help, but there would still always be two "nodes" indicating where solar eclipses could happen on the planet. Even at a 90 degree angle, twice a year, the planet would see solar eclipses. at 10 degrees, new moons would still be relatively as frequent, though at 90 degrees, I don't think there would ever be a new moon.
Is there a way to make total solar eclipses happen infrequently, while keeping new moons frequent? And if so, what variable(s) need to change to make that happen?
science-based orbital-mechanics solar-system eclipses
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a system similar to the Earth/Moon/Sun system, how would one go about making solar eclipses rarer than they are here on earth, but keep new moons similar to how they currently are (or at least similar)?
At first I thought that increasing the lunar tilt from 5 degrees to, say, 10 degrees would help, but there would still always be two "nodes" indicating where solar eclipses could happen on the planet. Even at a 90 degree angle, twice a year, the planet would see solar eclipses. at 10 degrees, new moons would still be relatively as frequent, though at 90 degrees, I don't think there would ever be a new moon.
Is there a way to make total solar eclipses happen infrequently, while keeping new moons frequent? And if so, what variable(s) need to change to make that happen?
science-based orbital-mechanics solar-system eclipses
$endgroup$
Given a system similar to the Earth/Moon/Sun system, how would one go about making solar eclipses rarer than they are here on earth, but keep new moons similar to how they currently are (or at least similar)?
At first I thought that increasing the lunar tilt from 5 degrees to, say, 10 degrees would help, but there would still always be two "nodes" indicating where solar eclipses could happen on the planet. Even at a 90 degree angle, twice a year, the planet would see solar eclipses. at 10 degrees, new moons would still be relatively as frequent, though at 90 degrees, I don't think there would ever be a new moon.
Is there a way to make total solar eclipses happen infrequently, while keeping new moons frequent? And if so, what variable(s) need to change to make that happen?
science-based orbital-mechanics solar-system eclipses
science-based orbital-mechanics solar-system eclipses
edited 1 hour ago
Cyn
10.7k12348
10.7k12348
asked 2 hours ago
Cristian C.Cristian C.
1989
1989
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Keep sun and moon sizes, make the orbit of the Earth around the sun more excentric and with a smaller mean distance.
The new moon is unnafected, but full solar eclipses will only happen if the eclipse happens together with the Earth's apoapsis, or close to it. And that will only happen during a few specific days of the year. Any solar eclipse far from the apoapsis will be partial.
That also implies shorter years and a whole different set of conditions on the planet that might not be compatible with life as we know it, though.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I would have to keep the orbit well within not just the Goldilocks zone, but within our human threshold of said zone. But your answer is fair, and technically answers my question haha.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just shrink the moon by 6%, and there will never be another total solar eclipse, but new moons will still happen as normal. The moon will be too small to fully cover the sun, so there will be partial and annular eclipses, but no total ones. If you still want the occasional total eclipse, make the moon slightly bigger again, so that eclipses are total if and only if it happens to be at the closest point to the Earth in its orbit at the time of the eclipse. We’d still get the same number of eclipses at the same time, but hardly any of them would be total.
Since both the moon and the Earth are in elliptical orbits, the apparent angular sizes of the moon and sun vary. Specifically, the moon varies between 29' 26" and 33' 30" while the sun varies between 31' 36" and 32' 42". You want the moon’s maximum to be just larger than the sun’s minimum, so that there are very occasional total eclipses if we happen to get an eclipse when the moon is at its closest and the sun is at its furthest. So to reduce the moon’s maximum angular size to 31’ 40” you need to make it 5.5% smaller without changing its orbit.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
After the edit, this fits what I need. Could you explain further what the size of the moon would need to be for the total eclipses to happen ? Are you saying to make the moon's orbit more elliptical while also shrinking the size of the moon a little bit? Doesn't that still equate to two nodes where eclipses can happen, ergo twice a year?
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@CristianC.: Total solar eclipses happen because, purely by accident, the angular size of the Moon is just big enough to cover the Sun. A very slightly smaller Moon, or a very slightly larger radius of Moon's orbit, or a very slightly smaller radius of the Earth's orbit would make total solar eclipses impossible.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP to clarify, what I meant was to make the lunar perigee smaller while also shrinking the size of the moon. This keeps the relative size of the moon the same to an observer on the planet, and therefore would continue to create total solar eclipses. Though I don't think the frequency would be affected.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC. Have edited to answer your queries.
$endgroup$
– Mike Scott
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At 90 degree inclination, you could still get new moons near the nodes where the inclination of the moon's orbit with respect to the line from the planet to the sun is low.
The presence of nodes in the planet's orbit where the inclined orbital path of the moon intersects a line pointing towards the sun, however, is not itself problematic, because it is not itself sufficient to cause eclipses. And that's a good thing for you, because it's a simple geometric fact that you can't avoid them. In order to get an eclipse, the moon also has to actually pass through that intersection point during the brief period when it exists every half-year. As such, a very simple solution to avoid ever having an eclipse presents itself: just tweak the moon's orbital period so that it forms a simple integer ratio with the year, such that the moon is always in the same phase on the same date every year--and then just declare that the phases are such that you never have things line up for an eclipse.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Great mathematical explanation. That being said, I don't need eclipses be nonexistent, just rarer, though i suspect this is a harder thing to do than i initially thought.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
23 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142780%2fmake-solar-eclipses-exceedingly-rare-but-still-have-new-moons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Keep sun and moon sizes, make the orbit of the Earth around the sun more excentric and with a smaller mean distance.
The new moon is unnafected, but full solar eclipses will only happen if the eclipse happens together with the Earth's apoapsis, or close to it. And that will only happen during a few specific days of the year. Any solar eclipse far from the apoapsis will be partial.
That also implies shorter years and a whole different set of conditions on the planet that might not be compatible with life as we know it, though.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I would have to keep the orbit well within not just the Goldilocks zone, but within our human threshold of said zone. But your answer is fair, and technically answers my question haha.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Keep sun and moon sizes, make the orbit of the Earth around the sun more excentric and with a smaller mean distance.
The new moon is unnafected, but full solar eclipses will only happen if the eclipse happens together with the Earth's apoapsis, or close to it. And that will only happen during a few specific days of the year. Any solar eclipse far from the apoapsis will be partial.
That also implies shorter years and a whole different set of conditions on the planet that might not be compatible with life as we know it, though.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I would have to keep the orbit well within not just the Goldilocks zone, but within our human threshold of said zone. But your answer is fair, and technically answers my question haha.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Keep sun and moon sizes, make the orbit of the Earth around the sun more excentric and with a smaller mean distance.
The new moon is unnafected, but full solar eclipses will only happen if the eclipse happens together with the Earth's apoapsis, or close to it. And that will only happen during a few specific days of the year. Any solar eclipse far from the apoapsis will be partial.
That also implies shorter years and a whole different set of conditions on the planet that might not be compatible with life as we know it, though.
$endgroup$
Keep sun and moon sizes, make the orbit of the Earth around the sun more excentric and with a smaller mean distance.
The new moon is unnafected, but full solar eclipses will only happen if the eclipse happens together with the Earth's apoapsis, or close to it. And that will only happen during a few specific days of the year. Any solar eclipse far from the apoapsis will be partial.
That also implies shorter years and a whole different set of conditions on the planet that might not be compatible with life as we know it, though.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
RenanRenan
51.7k15119257
51.7k15119257
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I would have to keep the orbit well within not just the Goldilocks zone, but within our human threshold of said zone. But your answer is fair, and technically answers my question haha.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I would have to keep the orbit well within not just the Goldilocks zone, but within our human threshold of said zone. But your answer is fair, and technically answers my question haha.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yeah I would have to keep the orbit well within not just the Goldilocks zone, but within our human threshold of said zone. But your answer is fair, and technically answers my question haha.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah I would have to keep the orbit well within not just the Goldilocks zone, but within our human threshold of said zone. But your answer is fair, and technically answers my question haha.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just shrink the moon by 6%, and there will never be another total solar eclipse, but new moons will still happen as normal. The moon will be too small to fully cover the sun, so there will be partial and annular eclipses, but no total ones. If you still want the occasional total eclipse, make the moon slightly bigger again, so that eclipses are total if and only if it happens to be at the closest point to the Earth in its orbit at the time of the eclipse. We’d still get the same number of eclipses at the same time, but hardly any of them would be total.
Since both the moon and the Earth are in elliptical orbits, the apparent angular sizes of the moon and sun vary. Specifically, the moon varies between 29' 26" and 33' 30" while the sun varies between 31' 36" and 32' 42". You want the moon’s maximum to be just larger than the sun’s minimum, so that there are very occasional total eclipses if we happen to get an eclipse when the moon is at its closest and the sun is at its furthest. So to reduce the moon’s maximum angular size to 31’ 40” you need to make it 5.5% smaller without changing its orbit.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
After the edit, this fits what I need. Could you explain further what the size of the moon would need to be for the total eclipses to happen ? Are you saying to make the moon's orbit more elliptical while also shrinking the size of the moon a little bit? Doesn't that still equate to two nodes where eclipses can happen, ergo twice a year?
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@CristianC.: Total solar eclipses happen because, purely by accident, the angular size of the Moon is just big enough to cover the Sun. A very slightly smaller Moon, or a very slightly larger radius of Moon's orbit, or a very slightly smaller radius of the Earth's orbit would make total solar eclipses impossible.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP to clarify, what I meant was to make the lunar perigee smaller while also shrinking the size of the moon. This keeps the relative size of the moon the same to an observer on the planet, and therefore would continue to create total solar eclipses. Though I don't think the frequency would be affected.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC. Have edited to answer your queries.
$endgroup$
– Mike Scott
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just shrink the moon by 6%, and there will never be another total solar eclipse, but new moons will still happen as normal. The moon will be too small to fully cover the sun, so there will be partial and annular eclipses, but no total ones. If you still want the occasional total eclipse, make the moon slightly bigger again, so that eclipses are total if and only if it happens to be at the closest point to the Earth in its orbit at the time of the eclipse. We’d still get the same number of eclipses at the same time, but hardly any of them would be total.
Since both the moon and the Earth are in elliptical orbits, the apparent angular sizes of the moon and sun vary. Specifically, the moon varies between 29' 26" and 33' 30" while the sun varies between 31' 36" and 32' 42". You want the moon’s maximum to be just larger than the sun’s minimum, so that there are very occasional total eclipses if we happen to get an eclipse when the moon is at its closest and the sun is at its furthest. So to reduce the moon’s maximum angular size to 31’ 40” you need to make it 5.5% smaller without changing its orbit.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
After the edit, this fits what I need. Could you explain further what the size of the moon would need to be for the total eclipses to happen ? Are you saying to make the moon's orbit more elliptical while also shrinking the size of the moon a little bit? Doesn't that still equate to two nodes where eclipses can happen, ergo twice a year?
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@CristianC.: Total solar eclipses happen because, purely by accident, the angular size of the Moon is just big enough to cover the Sun. A very slightly smaller Moon, or a very slightly larger radius of Moon's orbit, or a very slightly smaller radius of the Earth's orbit would make total solar eclipses impossible.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP to clarify, what I meant was to make the lunar perigee smaller while also shrinking the size of the moon. This keeps the relative size of the moon the same to an observer on the planet, and therefore would continue to create total solar eclipses. Though I don't think the frequency would be affected.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC. Have edited to answer your queries.
$endgroup$
– Mike Scott
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just shrink the moon by 6%, and there will never be another total solar eclipse, but new moons will still happen as normal. The moon will be too small to fully cover the sun, so there will be partial and annular eclipses, but no total ones. If you still want the occasional total eclipse, make the moon slightly bigger again, so that eclipses are total if and only if it happens to be at the closest point to the Earth in its orbit at the time of the eclipse. We’d still get the same number of eclipses at the same time, but hardly any of them would be total.
Since both the moon and the Earth are in elliptical orbits, the apparent angular sizes of the moon and sun vary. Specifically, the moon varies between 29' 26" and 33' 30" while the sun varies between 31' 36" and 32' 42". You want the moon’s maximum to be just larger than the sun’s minimum, so that there are very occasional total eclipses if we happen to get an eclipse when the moon is at its closest and the sun is at its furthest. So to reduce the moon’s maximum angular size to 31’ 40” you need to make it 5.5% smaller without changing its orbit.
$endgroup$
Just shrink the moon by 6%, and there will never be another total solar eclipse, but new moons will still happen as normal. The moon will be too small to fully cover the sun, so there will be partial and annular eclipses, but no total ones. If you still want the occasional total eclipse, make the moon slightly bigger again, so that eclipses are total if and only if it happens to be at the closest point to the Earth in its orbit at the time of the eclipse. We’d still get the same number of eclipses at the same time, but hardly any of them would be total.
Since both the moon and the Earth are in elliptical orbits, the apparent angular sizes of the moon and sun vary. Specifically, the moon varies between 29' 26" and 33' 30" while the sun varies between 31' 36" and 32' 42". You want the moon’s maximum to be just larger than the sun’s minimum, so that there are very occasional total eclipses if we happen to get an eclipse when the moon is at its closest and the sun is at its furthest. So to reduce the moon’s maximum angular size to 31’ 40” you need to make it 5.5% smaller without changing its orbit.
edited 28 secs ago
answered 1 hour ago
Mike ScottMike Scott
11.4k32349
11.4k32349
$begingroup$
After the edit, this fits what I need. Could you explain further what the size of the moon would need to be for the total eclipses to happen ? Are you saying to make the moon's orbit more elliptical while also shrinking the size of the moon a little bit? Doesn't that still equate to two nodes where eclipses can happen, ergo twice a year?
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@CristianC.: Total solar eclipses happen because, purely by accident, the angular size of the Moon is just big enough to cover the Sun. A very slightly smaller Moon, or a very slightly larger radius of Moon's orbit, or a very slightly smaller radius of the Earth's orbit would make total solar eclipses impossible.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP to clarify, what I meant was to make the lunar perigee smaller while also shrinking the size of the moon. This keeps the relative size of the moon the same to an observer on the planet, and therefore would continue to create total solar eclipses. Though I don't think the frequency would be affected.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC. Have edited to answer your queries.
$endgroup$
– Mike Scott
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After the edit, this fits what I need. Could you explain further what the size of the moon would need to be for the total eclipses to happen ? Are you saying to make the moon's orbit more elliptical while also shrinking the size of the moon a little bit? Doesn't that still equate to two nodes where eclipses can happen, ergo twice a year?
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@CristianC.: Total solar eclipses happen because, purely by accident, the angular size of the Moon is just big enough to cover the Sun. A very slightly smaller Moon, or a very slightly larger radius of Moon's orbit, or a very slightly smaller radius of the Earth's orbit would make total solar eclipses impossible.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP to clarify, what I meant was to make the lunar perigee smaller while also shrinking the size of the moon. This keeps the relative size of the moon the same to an observer on the planet, and therefore would continue to create total solar eclipses. Though I don't think the frequency would be affected.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC. Have edited to answer your queries.
$endgroup$
– Mike Scott
18 mins ago
$begingroup$
After the edit, this fits what I need. Could you explain further what the size of the moon would need to be for the total eclipses to happen ? Are you saying to make the moon's orbit more elliptical while also shrinking the size of the moon a little bit? Doesn't that still equate to two nodes where eclipses can happen, ergo twice a year?
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
After the edit, this fits what I need. Could you explain further what the size of the moon would need to be for the total eclipses to happen ? Are you saying to make the moon's orbit more elliptical while also shrinking the size of the moon a little bit? Doesn't that still equate to two nodes where eclipses can happen, ergo twice a year?
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@CristianC.: Total solar eclipses happen because, purely by accident, the angular size of the Moon is just big enough to cover the Sun. A very slightly smaller Moon, or a very slightly larger radius of Moon's orbit, or a very slightly smaller radius of the Earth's orbit would make total solar eclipses impossible.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC.: Total solar eclipses happen because, purely by accident, the angular size of the Moon is just big enough to cover the Sun. A very slightly smaller Moon, or a very slightly larger radius of Moon's orbit, or a very slightly smaller radius of the Earth's orbit would make total solar eclipses impossible.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP to clarify, what I meant was to make the lunar perigee smaller while also shrinking the size of the moon. This keeps the relative size of the moon the same to an observer on the planet, and therefore would continue to create total solar eclipses. Though I don't think the frequency would be affected.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP to clarify, what I meant was to make the lunar perigee smaller while also shrinking the size of the moon. This keeps the relative size of the moon the same to an observer on the planet, and therefore would continue to create total solar eclipses. Though I don't think the frequency would be affected.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC. Have edited to answer your queries.
$endgroup$
– Mike Scott
18 mins ago
$begingroup$
@CristianC. Have edited to answer your queries.
$endgroup$
– Mike Scott
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At 90 degree inclination, you could still get new moons near the nodes where the inclination of the moon's orbit with respect to the line from the planet to the sun is low.
The presence of nodes in the planet's orbit where the inclined orbital path of the moon intersects a line pointing towards the sun, however, is not itself problematic, because it is not itself sufficient to cause eclipses. And that's a good thing for you, because it's a simple geometric fact that you can't avoid them. In order to get an eclipse, the moon also has to actually pass through that intersection point during the brief period when it exists every half-year. As such, a very simple solution to avoid ever having an eclipse presents itself: just tweak the moon's orbital period so that it forms a simple integer ratio with the year, such that the moon is always in the same phase on the same date every year--and then just declare that the phases are such that you never have things line up for an eclipse.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Great mathematical explanation. That being said, I don't need eclipses be nonexistent, just rarer, though i suspect this is a harder thing to do than i initially thought.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At 90 degree inclination, you could still get new moons near the nodes where the inclination of the moon's orbit with respect to the line from the planet to the sun is low.
The presence of nodes in the planet's orbit where the inclined orbital path of the moon intersects a line pointing towards the sun, however, is not itself problematic, because it is not itself sufficient to cause eclipses. And that's a good thing for you, because it's a simple geometric fact that you can't avoid them. In order to get an eclipse, the moon also has to actually pass through that intersection point during the brief period when it exists every half-year. As such, a very simple solution to avoid ever having an eclipse presents itself: just tweak the moon's orbital period so that it forms a simple integer ratio with the year, such that the moon is always in the same phase on the same date every year--and then just declare that the phases are such that you never have things line up for an eclipse.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Great mathematical explanation. That being said, I don't need eclipses be nonexistent, just rarer, though i suspect this is a harder thing to do than i initially thought.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At 90 degree inclination, you could still get new moons near the nodes where the inclination of the moon's orbit with respect to the line from the planet to the sun is low.
The presence of nodes in the planet's orbit where the inclined orbital path of the moon intersects a line pointing towards the sun, however, is not itself problematic, because it is not itself sufficient to cause eclipses. And that's a good thing for you, because it's a simple geometric fact that you can't avoid them. In order to get an eclipse, the moon also has to actually pass through that intersection point during the brief period when it exists every half-year. As such, a very simple solution to avoid ever having an eclipse presents itself: just tweak the moon's orbital period so that it forms a simple integer ratio with the year, such that the moon is always in the same phase on the same date every year--and then just declare that the phases are such that you never have things line up for an eclipse.
$endgroup$
At 90 degree inclination, you could still get new moons near the nodes where the inclination of the moon's orbit with respect to the line from the planet to the sun is low.
The presence of nodes in the planet's orbit where the inclined orbital path of the moon intersects a line pointing towards the sun, however, is not itself problematic, because it is not itself sufficient to cause eclipses. And that's a good thing for you, because it's a simple geometric fact that you can't avoid them. In order to get an eclipse, the moon also has to actually pass through that intersection point during the brief period when it exists every half-year. As such, a very simple solution to avoid ever having an eclipse presents itself: just tweak the moon's orbital period so that it forms a simple integer ratio with the year, such that the moon is always in the same phase on the same date every year--and then just declare that the phases are such that you never have things line up for an eclipse.
answered 32 mins ago
Logan R. KearsleyLogan R. Kearsley
11.4k13157
11.4k13157
$begingroup$
Great mathematical explanation. That being said, I don't need eclipses be nonexistent, just rarer, though i suspect this is a harder thing to do than i initially thought.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Great mathematical explanation. That being said, I don't need eclipses be nonexistent, just rarer, though i suspect this is a harder thing to do than i initially thought.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great mathematical explanation. That being said, I don't need eclipses be nonexistent, just rarer, though i suspect this is a harder thing to do than i initially thought.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
Great mathematical explanation. That being said, I don't need eclipses be nonexistent, just rarer, though i suspect this is a harder thing to do than i initially thought.
$endgroup$
– Cristian C.
23 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142780%2fmake-solar-eclipses-exceedingly-rare-but-still-have-new-moons%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown